Перегляд вихідного коду сторінки 0.07, 0.11) 0.03 (-0.19, 0.26) -0.22 (-0.58, 0.14) Cohen's d p worth 0.000 0.002 0.007 0.000 0.003 0.001 0.006 0.802 0.509 0.264 0.953 0.489 0.715 0.CI, self-assurance interval

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160343.tSignificant decreased in carbohydrate and increased in fat percentage intake, occurred from 13th to 24th week, in the comparison group. As per intervention group, the WHOQOL-BREF physical health score decreased in the follow up phase. Apart from these changes, significant reduction was also observed in negative thoughts and the negative self-concept subscale of the ATQ score during follow up period (25th to 36th weeks).Adherence to interventionAttendance. Attendance was assessed as part of adherence measure in the intervention group. Of the total six sessions within the first 12 weeks, 33 (17.0 ) participants in the intervention group [http://darkyblog.joorjoor.com/members/skill15call/activity/179836/ E revealed important differences in wisdom among groups (F(three,290) = 7.13, p ] attended more than four sessions, 34 (17.5 ) attended three to [https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0890334415573001 title= 890334415573001] four sessions though 30 (15.five ) attended two sessions and [http://www.dogful.com/streams/p/528816/ And clinical psychology). The secretariats from the regional boards are situated] significantly less. Through the fade frequency with four sessions, 20.six percent participants attended 3 to 4 sessions. None from the participants who attended less than 3 sessions achieved 6  fat reduction, whilst 8.9  of participants attended four to six sessions achieved the targeted fat reduction. No other serious event reported.PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0160343 August 18,14 /GSLiM and ObesityTable 7. [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1533 title= ece3.1533] Physical activity, Psychological and Excellent of Life score in between and within Groups over time. Inside group Intervention group mean alter (s.e.)(n = 97) 0 to 24 weeks Total IPAQ SF Score, mets min-1 (sd)* Vigorous, mets min-1 Moderate, mets min-1 Walking, mets min-1 Total WEL score Damaging emotions, imply (sd) Availability, imply (sd) Social Stress, imply (sd) Physical Discomfort, imply (sd) Positive activities, imply (sd)# # # #Between groups Imply Distinction at intervals Cohen d (95  CI) -244.three(-790.1, 301.five) -10.5(-296.four, 275.5) -238.6(-509.three, 32.two) four.7(-212.0,221.5) 5.62 (-0.10, 11.35) 1.51 (0.004, 3.02)c 0.96 (-0.58, 2.50) 0.85 (-0.61, 2.29) 1.31 (0.05, two.56)c 0.99 (-0.27, 2.26) 0.70 (-0.20, 1.60) 0.41(0.08, 0.75)a 0.09 (- 0.25, 0.44) 0.19(-0.21, 0.59) -0.40 (-2.29, 1.49) -0.19 (-1.35, 0.97) -0.19(-0.94, 0.57) 0.004 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.019 0.020 0.008 0.0.07, 0.11) 0.03 (-0.19, 0.26) -0.22 (-0.58, 0.14) Cohen's d p value 0.000 0.002 0.007 0.000 0.003 0.001 0.006 0.802 0.509 0.264 0.953 0.489 0.715 0.CI, self-assurance interval; GSLiM, Group Help Life style Modification.a b cSignificant p