<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="uk">
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Glider20day</id>
		<title>HistoryPedia - Внесок користувача [uk]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Glider20day"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%86%D1%96%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%B0:%D0%92%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BA/Glider20day"/>
		<updated>2026-05-18T10:27:42Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Внесок користувача</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=T)_yields_about_2400_articles_dealing_with_visual_consideration%3F2011_Elsevier_Ltd._All&amp;diff=282637</id>
		<title>T) yields about 2400 articles dealing with visual consideration?2011 Elsevier Ltd. All</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=T)_yields_about_2400_articles_dealing_with_visual_consideration%3F2011_Elsevier_Ltd._All&amp;diff=282637"/>
				<updated>2018-02-01T00:16:40Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Glider20day: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Our [http://campuscrimes.tv/members/epochmosque0/activity/702085/ The identical location when focus is allocated elsewhere (Beck   Kastner, 2009; Slotnick] understanding of visual interest has sophisticated drastically during this epoch as a consequence of quite a few components: (1) psychophysical analysis on humans has systemat.T) yields about 2400 articles coping with visual consideration?2011 [http://05961.net/comment/html/?355142.html Result in a suprathreshold target could be confused with supra-threshold distracters. According] Elsevier Ltd. Quite a few testimonials on visual attention happen to be published in the final 25 years in the Annual Evaluation of Psychology (Chun, Golomb,   Turk-Browne, 2011; Egeth   Yantis, 1997; Johnston   Dark, 1986; Kinchla, 1992; Logan, 2004; Pashler, Johnston,   Ruthruff, 2001; Posner   Rothbart, 2007) and Annual [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161664 title= journal.pone.0161664] Evaluation of Neuroscience (Bisley   Goldberg, 2010; Colby   Goldberg, 1999; Desimone   Duncan, 1995; Kastner   Ungerleider, 2000; Knudsen, 2007; Posner   Petersen, 1990; Reynolds   Chelazzi, 2004). The first paper in Vision Analysis that identified attention as a crucial word was published in 1976, and only 6 a lot more papers were published throughout the 1980s.T) yields about 2400 articles dealing with visual consideration?2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.CarrascoPagesince 1980. Nearly half of those articles had been published considering that 2005, with more than 250 published in 2010 alone (Fig. 1a). Of these, slightly more than half have been behavioral research (cognitive and psychophysical), and slightly significantly less than half were neurophysiological. Several evaluations on visual focus have been published inside the final 25 years inside the Annual Overview of Psychology (Chun, Golomb,   Turk-Browne, 2011; Egeth   Yantis, 1997; Johnston   Dark, 1986; Kinchla, 1992; Logan, 2004; Pashler, Johnston,   Ruthruff, 2001; Posner   Rothbart, 2007) and Annual [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161664 title= journal.pone.0161664] Evaluation of Neuroscience (Bisley   Goldberg, 2010; Colby   Goldberg, 1999; Desimone   Duncan, 1995; Kastner   Ungerleider, 2000; Knudsen, 2007; Posner   Petersen, 1990; Reynolds   Chelazzi, 2004). The very first paper in Vision Analysis that identified focus as a crucial word was published in 1976, and only 6 much more papers were published through the 1980s. The number of articles on attention published since the 1980s is about 330. The price of publication has steadily improved with time, the number of publications greater than doubling every 5 years from 1970 by means of 2005. This expansion has continued, even though not as pronouncedly, with about 50  a lot more papers published in 2005?010 than in 2000?005 (Fig. 1b). These articles have largely focused on behavioral investigation, with roughly 1 in six [https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S108966 title= CPAA.S108966] articles getting a concentrate on neurophysiology. In line with this development in interest, [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160000 title= journal.pone.0160000] three particular issues on visual attention happen to be published in Vision Investigation during the final decade (Baldassi, Burr, Carrasco, Eckstein,   Verghese, 2004; Carrasco, Eckstein, Verghese, Boynton,   Treue, 2009; Spekreijse, 2000). The appeal of visual consideration appears to be associated to an observation that may be most likely to disconcert a standard vision scientist: changing an observer's attentional state when keeping the retinal image continual can have an effect on perceptual functionality plus the activity of `sensory' neurons all through visual cortex. For over a century, the study of visual interest has attracted several of the greatest thinkers in psychology, neurophysiology and perceptual sciences, like Hermann von Helmholtz, Wilhelm Wundt and William James. Extra recently (1960?980s), several psychologists, such as Michael Posner, Anne Treisman, Donald Broadbent and Ulric Neisser, have offered distinct theories and created experimental paradigms to investigate what focus does and what perceptual processes it impacts.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Glider20day</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=D,_2009)._The_processing_of_sensory_input_is_facilitated_by_understanding_and&amp;diff=281025</id>
		<title>D, 2009). The processing of sensory input is facilitated by understanding and</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=D,_2009)._The_processing_of_sensory_input_is_facilitated_by_understanding_and&amp;diff=281025"/>
				<updated>2018-01-27T12:19:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Glider20day: Створена сторінка: Certainly, numerous studies have shown that directing [https://www.medchemexpress.com/ONX-0914.html ONX-0914] interest to a spatial place or to distinguishing o...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Certainly, numerous studies have shown that directing [https://www.medchemexpress.com/ONX-0914.html ONX-0914] interest to a spatial place or to distinguishing options of a target can enhance its discriminability as well as the [https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.190108 title= 0019-5154.190108] [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2353 title= ece3.2353] evoked neural response. Nonetheless, we're far from a consensus on how visual interest works.1Results in the attention network test (ANT), which is created to evaluate alerting, orienting, and executive attention in adults, youngsters, patients, and monkeys, has suggested that the efficiencies of those 3 networks are uncorrelated (Fan, McCandliss, Sommer, Raz,   Posner, 2002).Vision Res. Author manuscript; offered in PMC 2012 July 05.CarrascoPageThere are three most important sorts of visual attention: (1) spatial focus, which can be either overt, when an observer moves his/her eyes to a relevant location and the focus of interest coincides with all the movement of the eyes, or covert, when attention is deployed to relevant places with no accompanying eye movements; (2) feature-based attention (FBA), which may be deployed covertly to distinct aspects (e.g., color, orientation or motion direction) of objects in the atmosphere, irrespective of their place; and, (three) object-based consideration in which focus is influenced or guided by object structure (object-based focus is not going to be discussed further within this assessment; for testimonials see Olson, 2001; Scholl, 2001).two By focusing on distinctive types of info, these kinds of interest optimize our visual system: whereas spatial consideration guides an observer to a certain location, FBA guides an observer to distinct capabilities in the visual scene. For example, when waiting to meet a pal at a caf?we may perhaps deploy spatial focus towards the door (exactly where he is most likely to seem) and deploy FBA to orange objects (due to the fact he normally wears an orange jacket). Focus can have an effect on perception by altering performance ?how effectively we execute on a provided task  nd/or by altering the subjective appearance of a stimulus or object. The term focus has been broadly employed, but sadly it has not usually been defined explicitly. In reality, in some research, it is not clear regardless of whether or how the construct has been operationalized. Here, I will critique research of covert interest that conform towards the view that consideration is actually a selective method, that is typically conceptualized as being related to limited cognitive and brain re.D, 2009). The processing of sensory input is facilitated by understanding and assumptions in regards to the globe, by the behavioral state with the organism, and by the (sudden) appearance of possibly relevant facts inside the atmosphere. Indeed, various studies have shown that directing attention to a spatial location or to distinguishing functions of a target can enhance its discriminability as well as the [https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.190108 title= 0019-5154.190108] [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2353 title= ece3.2353] evoked neural response. For example, when waiting to meet a friend at a caf?we may possibly deploy spatial interest to the door (exactly where he's most likely to appear) and deploy FBA to orange objects (because he normally wears an orange jacket). Interest can influence perception by altering performance ?how nicely we execute on a given task  nd/or by altering the subjective appearance of a stimulus or object. The term focus has been extensively employed, but unfortunately it has not constantly been defined explicitly. The truth is, in some research, it really is not clear irrespective of whether or how the construct has been operationalized.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Glider20day</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=._Responses_towards_the_survey_have_been_anonymous,_but_we_tracked_the_traits&amp;diff=280088</id>
		<title>. Responses towards the survey have been anonymous, but we tracked the traits</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=._Responses_towards_the_survey_have_been_anonymous,_but_we_tracked_the_traits&amp;diff=280088"/>
				<updated>2018-01-25T01:13:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Glider20day: Створена сторінка: Patients have been also asked how extended they had been on dialysis, if a overall health care provider ever spoke to them about a kidney transplant and when th...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Patients have been also asked how extended they had been on dialysis, if a overall health care provider ever spoke to them about a kidney transplant and when this discussion took place, whether they had attended the transplant [http://hsepeoplejobs.com/members/toothbat23/activity/559221/ Ically characterized distinct attentional systems and their effects on perception; (two) single-unit] education class, and had been evaluated to get a kidney transplant. Sufferers had been then asked why they did not pursue transplantion and were supplied a list of alternatives including: Didn't believe I would pass all health-related tests, Did not fit my schedule, Did not have transportation or money to obtain to MUSC for the tests necessary just before [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2353 title= ece3.2353] transplant, Dialysis isn't that bad, Scared of obtaining a transplant, Cannot afford the transplant and/or medicines, Don't comprehend the transplant approach, Never understand the advantages of transplant, Wasn't confident ways to proceed, Didn't believe anybody would serve as a living donor for me, or Worried how long the wait to get a kidney will be plus an open narrative response category. Sufferers had been encouraged to circle all reasons that applied to them. The survey is provided in the end of this manuscript. The responses were aggregated, coded, and analyzed making use of SPSS. Descriptive analyses integrated frequencies, means, ranges, and regular deviations. Added analyses to detect variations were performed working with chi-square.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAcknowledgmentsThis function was funded by a grant from NIH/NIDDK &amp;quot;A Plan to Improve Living Donations in African Americans.&amp;quot;Kidney Int. Author manuscript; readily available in PMC 2013 May 01.Kazley et al.Web page&lt;br /&gt;
In his short story Funes el memorioso [Funes the memorious] the fantastic Argentine author Jorge Luis Borges [http://kfyst.com/comment/html/?291216.html Overt spatial interest: endogenous and exogenous William James described two different] depicts a character with absolute memory and absolute perception. The tale shows how this prodigious character is, in important techniques, unable to think, and unable to find out. Forgetting, Borges suggests, is what enables remembering and thinking; perceiving totally almost everything, with no choice and interpretation, leads, according to the logic in the brief story, to a type of paralysis, a sort of blindness. Borges's insights are on point: Each time we open our eyes we are confronted with an overwhelming level of facts. Despite this, we expertise a seemingly effortless understanding of our visual planet. This calls for separating the wheat in the chaff, choosing relevant info out of irrelevant noise. Interest will be the important to this process; it's the mechanism that turns searching into seeing. In perception, ignoring irrelevant data is what makes it possible for us to attend to and interpret the crucial parts of what we see. Interest allows us to selectively approach the vast amount of facts with which we're confronted, prioritizing [https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3440-z title= s12889-016-3440-z] some aspects of info even though ignoring other people by focusing on a certain location or aspect with the visual scene. The topic of visual interest is vast and could not be duly reviewed in a single paper.. Responses to the survey had been anonymous, but we tracked the traits in the cohort of individuals who agreed to participate in the study. Hence, the survey responses weren't linked to person individuals, however the researchers know the status inside the transplant course of action of the sample as a entire.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Glider20day</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=T)_yields_about_2400_articles_dealing_with_visual_focus%3F2011_Elsevier_Ltd._All&amp;diff=279658</id>
		<title>T) yields about 2400 articles dealing with visual focus?2011 Elsevier Ltd. All</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=T)_yields_about_2400_articles_dealing_with_visual_focus%3F2011_Elsevier_Ltd._All&amp;diff=279658"/>
				<updated>2018-01-23T22:01:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Glider20day: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;For over a century, the study of visual interest has attracted many of the greatest thinkers in psychology, neurophysiology and perceptual sciences, [https://www.medchemexpress.com/Omecamtiv-mecarbil.html CK-1827452 custom synthesis] [https://www.medchemexpress.com/Odanacatib.html MK-0822 biological activity] including Hermann von Helmholtz, Wilhelm Wundt and William James. Previously 25 years, and specifically within the final 15, there has been a increasing interest in the mechanisms of visual focus: how visual interest modulates the spatial and temporal sensitivity of early perceptual filters, how focus influences the collection of stimuli of interest, how and exactly where the neuronal responses are modulated, what neural computations underlie the selection processes, and how interest and eye movements interact. Our understanding of visual attention has advanced substantially for the duration of this epoch on account of a number of aspects: (1) psychophysical study on humans has systemat.T) yields about 2400 articles coping with visual attention?2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.CarrascoPagesince 1980. Virtually half of those articles had been published considering that 2005, with over 250 published in 2010 alone (Fig. 1a). Of those, slightly more than half have been behavioral research (cognitive and psychophysical), and slightly significantly less than half have been neurophysiological. Quite a few reviews on visual interest have already been published inside the final 25 years in the Annual Assessment of Psychology (Chun, Golomb,   Turk-Browne, 2011; Egeth   Yantis, 1997; Johnston   Dark, 1986; Kinchla, 1992; Logan, 2004; Pashler, Johnston,   Ruthruff, 2001; Posner   Rothbart, 2007) and Annual [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161664 title= journal.pone.0161664] Assessment of Neuroscience (Bisley   Goldberg, 2010; Colby   Goldberg, 1999; Desimone   Duncan, 1995; Kastner   Ungerleider, 2000; Knudsen, 2007; Posner   Petersen, 1990; Reynolds   Chelazzi, 2004). The initial paper in Vision Research that identified focus as a essential word was published in 1976, and only 6 much more papers were published through the 1980s. The amount of articles on focus published because the 1980s is about 330. The price of publication has steadily elevated with time, the amount of publications greater than doubling just about every 5 years from 1970 via 2005. This expansion has continued, despite the fact that not as pronouncedly, with about 50  far more papers published in 2005?010 than in 2000?005 (Fig. 1b). These articles have largely focused on behavioral analysis, with roughly 1 in six [https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S108966 title= CPAA.S108966] articles obtaining a concentrate on neurophysiology. In line with this growth in interest, [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160000 title= journal.pone.0160000] three particular troubles on visual consideration have already been published in Vision Analysis through the last decade (Baldassi, Burr, Carrasco, Eckstein,   Verghese, 2004; Carrasco, Eckstein, Verghese, Boynton,   Treue, 2009; Spekreijse, 2000). The appeal of visual focus appears to be associated to an observation that may be likely to disconcert a conventional vision scientist: altering an observer's attentional state whilst maintaining the retinal image constant can have an effect on perceptual functionality along with the activity of `sensory' neurons all through visual cortex. For more than a century, the study of visual consideration has attracted many of the greatest thinkers in psychology, neurophysiology and perceptual sciences, including Hermann von Helmholtz, Wilhelm Wundt and William James. Extra recently (1960?980s), numerous psychologists, including Michael Posner, Anne Treisman, Donald Broadbent and Ulric Neisser, have supplied distinct theories and created experimental paradigms to investigate what focus does and what perceptual processes it affects. Initially, there was an excellent deal of interest in categorizing mechanisms of vision as pre-attentive or attentive.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Glider20day</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=._Responses_to_the_survey_had_been_anonymous,_but_we_tracked_the_qualities&amp;diff=279240</id>
		<title>. Responses to the survey had been anonymous, but we tracked the qualities</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=._Responses_to_the_survey_had_been_anonymous,_but_we_tracked_the_qualities&amp;diff=279240"/>
				<updated>2018-01-22T18:58:15Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Glider20day: Створена сторінка: As a result, the survey responses were not linked to person sufferers, but the researchers know the status inside the [http://hs21.cn/comment/html/?204835.html...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;As a result, the survey responses were not linked to person sufferers, but the researchers know the status inside the [http://hs21.cn/comment/html/?204835.html Asco, 1999) could not be accounted for by any of those hypotheses] transplant approach from the sample as a complete. The survey asked patients demographic information and facts which include their age, race, gender, marital [https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.190108 title= 0019-5154.190108] status, educational status, and regardless of whether they lived within a rural areas. Patients had been also asked how lengthy they had been on dialysis, if a overall health care provider ever spoke to them about a kidney transplant and when this discussion took place, no matter if they had attended the transplant education class, and had been evaluated to get a kidney transplant. Individuals have been then asked why they did not pursue transplantion and were offered a list of selections which includes: Didn't think I'd pass all healthcare tests, Didn't match my schedule, Didn't have transportation or revenue to acquire to MUSC for the tests needed prior to [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2353 title= ece3.2353] transplant, Dialysis is not that negative, Scared of receiving a transplant, Cannot afford the transplant and/or medicines, Don't comprehend the transplant course of action, Don't understand the benefits of transplant, Wasn't certain the way to proceed, Didn't think anyone would serve as a living donor for me, or Worried how long the wait for any kidney could be plus an open narrative response category. Individuals have been encouraged to circle all factors that applied to them. The survey is supplied in the finish of this manuscript. The responses were aggregated, coded, and analyzed employing SPSS. Descriptive analyses included frequencies, means, ranges, and normal deviations. Added analyses to detect variations had been carried out making use of chi-square.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptAcknowledgmentsThis operate was funded by a grant from NIH/NIDDK &amp;quot;A Program to Raise Living Donations in African Americans.&amp;quot;Kidney Int. Author manuscript; accessible in PMC 2013 May possibly 01.Kazley et al.Page&lt;br /&gt;
In his quick story Funes el memorioso [Funes the memorious] the excellent Argentine author Jorge Luis Borges depicts a character with absolute memory and absolute perception. The tale shows how this prodigious character is, in vital techniques, unable to consider, and unable to view. Forgetting, Borges suggests, is what enables remembering and pondering; perceiving absolutely every little thing, with no choice and interpretation, leads, as outlined by the logic of your brief story, to a type of [http://hs21.cn/comment/html/?214253.html Stimulus sizes (Huang   Dobkins, 2005) and contrast obtain modifications had been reported with] paralysis, a sort of blindness. Borges's insights are on point: Every single time we open our eyes we're confronted with an overwhelming level of information. Despite this, we experience a seemingly effortless understanding of our visual globe. This needs separating the wheat in the chaff, picking relevant data out of irrelevant noise. Interest may be the crucial to this course of action; it really is the mechanism that turns searching into seeing. In perception, ignoring irrelevant facts is what tends to make it attainable for us to attend to and interpret the crucial components of what we see. Interest allows us to selectively process the vast level of details with which we're confronted, prioritizing [https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3440-z title= s12889-016-3440-z] some elements of details when ignoring other folks by focusing on a particular place or aspect in the visual scene.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Glider20day</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>