<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="uk">
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Steamwinter76</id>
		<title>HistoryPedia - Внесок користувача [uk]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Steamwinter76"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%86%D1%96%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%B0:%D0%92%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BA/Steamwinter76"/>
		<updated>2026-05-03T07:17:31Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Внесок користувача</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ing_from_0_to_255)_were_summed_as_much_as_calculate_the_final_saliency&amp;diff=294530</id>
		<title>Ing from 0 to 255) were summed as much as calculate the final saliency</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ing_from_0_to_255)_were_summed_as_much_as_calculate_the_final_saliency&amp;diff=294530"/>
				<updated>2018-02-27T16:32:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Steamwinter76: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In an attempt to separate the worldwide and nearby aspects of search we [http://www.medchemexpress.com/Monastrol.html Monastrol biological activity] looked at two components from the search epoch separately. Incidental fixations (x-axis) are regarded incidental in the event the fixation was made to a nontarget object before that object has ever been identified as a search target. The number of fixations essential to find the object once it has turn out to be a search target for the initial time (1st Search Episode) are presented around the y-axis. Every object contributes 1 data point, and identical points aren't clear around the scatterplot. Marginal histograms are thus presented for the ideal and above the scatterplot, and distribution implies are indicated by the thin lines. SE = Search Episode. doi:ten.1371/journal.pone.0094362.gThe Impact of Scene Memory on Eye MovementsFigure 6. The 3 objects that have been searched for repeatedly and their colour adjust on day three with the experiment. From left to correct: the coffeemaker, bedstand, and kettle. Top rated row presents the object as it was on day 1, day 2 and day three just before change, bottom row presents the objects just after the day three change. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094362.gscene plus the corresponding saliency maps for an instance object, the coffee maker, are shown in Figure eight. The saliency worth for the kettle and the bed stand decreased following the colour change, and saliency for the coffee maker elevated by only 3 . Hence the raise in fixation probabilities are unlikely to be the outcome of a rise in bottom up salience.DiscussionThe purpose of this experiment was to study the role of scene memory in visual search and change detection in an immersive environment. The experiment required subjects to invest a prolonged time period within the atmosphere so that you can deliver an exposure a lot more comparable to all-natural expertise than standard experimental paradigms. Time inside the environment was necessarily restricted, and amounted to a little more than an hour more than 3 days. Even so, within that period subjects each made over 10,000 fixations inside the [https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-57 title= 1472-6882-11-57] virtual apartment. Consequently the visual knowledge parallels no less than a subset of ordinary expertise. We found that subjects in such environments confine their gaze almostexclusively to mid-heights, with just about no fixations on high regions in the environment. Part of the predominance of mid-height fixations is explained by [https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1014296 title= NEJMoa1014296] the location of the search targets, however the absence of high or low fixations (except for the floor) indicates that subjects usually do not explore such regions, and suggests the existence of strong priors for where the search targets are likely to become located. This is constant with all the discovering of such priors in 2D all-natural scene photos by Torralba et al. [52]. We were not capable to discern any obvious alterations inside the spread of fixations within the environment with experience. In an attempt to separate the international and nearby elements of search we looked at two components on the search epoch separately. The worldwide element was assessed by measuring the effectively by which subjects approached the search target more than the course [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2011.08.016 title= j.meegid.2011.08.016] of a trial.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Steamwinter76</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=He_1st_session._Thus,_locating_the_approximate_global_place_did_not&amp;diff=293756</id>
		<title>He 1st session. Thus, locating the approximate global place did not</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=He_1st_session._Thus,_locating_the_approximate_global_place_did_not&amp;diff=293756"/>
				<updated>2018-02-26T11:10:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Steamwinter76: Створена сторінка: This suggests that memory for spatial location is an crucial aspect in locating [http://eaamongolia.org/vanilla/discussion/700540/tion-was-being-uploaded-becaus...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This suggests that memory for spatial location is an crucial aspect in locating [http://eaamongolia.org/vanilla/discussion/700540/tion-was-being-uploaded-because-it-was-getting-accomplished-but-because Tion was being uploaded because it was getting accomplished. But because] targets in all-natural situations. [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2011.08.016 title= j.meegid.2011.08.016] Having said that, to know the improvement of scene memory we require, additionally, to understand whether or not subjects encode the locations that they fixate within the context of other searches as wel.He first session. As a result, obtaining the approximate global place did not alter incredibly a lot more than repeated searches. Nonetheless, the topic had been inside the environment for many minutes searching for other targets, and so had various possibilities to learn the common arrangement on the apartment (kitchen and dining area, bedroom, bathroom), and might have moved to the approximate location on the basis of semantic cues, which include moving for the kitchen for the coffee maker. When inside the correct room the subject need to have only orient the head inside the appropriate path so that you can bring the target on screen. The nearby component of search was assessed by measuring the amount of fixations made by the subject from the moment the search target had entered subject's field of view and till prosperous place with the target. This local aspect of search improved quickly with repeated search, falling from about 12 to 5 fixations and stabilizing immediately after three? episodes, with most of the improvement occurring amongst the initial and third Search Episodes. This suggests that memory for spatial location is definitely an critical issue in locating targets in all-natural circumstances. It is actually also possible that memory for visual attributes linked together with the verbal description facilitated search. This memory persisted when subjects repeated search on the subsequent day, with little if any detectable memory loss. ItFigure 7. The probability of fixating an object increases for objects which have changed color, but not for all those which have remained unchanged. Each panels present p(fixation|inFOV), the probability of fixating an object given that it can be in the field of view and not a existing target of a search, for Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 before the color [https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jz2006447 title= jz2006447] adjust and Day three after the color alter, averaged more than objects and subjects. A. Imply p(fixation|inFOV) for the three objects that changed color. B. Imply p(fixation|inFOV) for the remaining unchanged objects. Error bars are standard error among subjects. FOV = field of view. * p.0.05, ** p.0.001, corrected for a number of comparisons. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094362.gThe Impact of Scene Memory on Eye MovementsFigure eight. Bottom up saliency will not transform because of object colour adjust. Left: Image of your coffee maker and corresponding saliency map per code by Itti and Koch [22]. Correct: Image with the coffee maker immediately after the color transform, plus the corresponding saliency map. Saliency values have been computed within the red rectangle. doi:ten.1371/journal.pone.0094362.gis difficult to make precise comparisons with other function inside the literature, provided the extremely distinctive experimental context. On the other hand, the [https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874285801105010083 title= 1874285801105010000] finding of rapid improvement in functionality with repeated search is constant with all the findings of Vo et al. [53], Holling  worth [50] and other individuals, even though the number of fixations to find the object once on-screen is somewhat higher in our task (5 fixations versus 1 or two).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Steamwinter76</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ing_from_0_to_255)_were_summed_as_much_as_calculate_the_final_saliency&amp;diff=293693</id>
		<title>Ing from 0 to 255) were summed as much as calculate the final saliency</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ing_from_0_to_255)_were_summed_as_much_as_calculate_the_final_saliency&amp;diff=293693"/>
				<updated>2018-02-26T09:23:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Steamwinter76: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The amount of incidental [http://www.medchemexpress.com/Wortmannin.html KY-12420 web] fixations to objects that have but to become searched for does not correlate with number of fixations expected to find the object on 1st Search Episode. The saliency worth for the kettle as well as the bed stand decreased after the colour change, and saliency for the coffee maker increased by only 3 . Thus the boost in fixation probabilities are unlikely to be the outcome of an increase in bottom up salience.DiscussionThe objective of this experiment was to study the role of scene memory in visual search and modify detection in an immersive environment. The experiment required subjects to invest a prolonged time period in the environment so that you can present an exposure much more comparable to all-natural practical experience than standard experimental paradigms. Time inside the environment was necessarily restricted, and amounted to a little bit more than an hour over three days. However, within that period subjects every created over ten,000 fixations inside the [https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-57 title= 1472-6882-11-57] virtual apartment. Consequently the visual knowledge parallels no less than a subset of ordinary practical experience. We discovered that subjects in such environments confine their gaze [http://www.medchemexpress.com/Nigericin-sodium-salt.html Sodium Nigericin chemical information] almostexclusively to mid-heights, with just about no fixations on higher regions inside the environment. A part of the predominance of mid-height fixations is explained by [https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1014296 title= NEJMoa1014296] the place of your search targets, but the absence of higher or low fixations (except for the floor) indicates that subjects ordinarily usually do not discover such regions, and suggests the existence of powerful priors for where the search targets are most likely to be situated. This is consistent with the acquiring of such priors in 2D natural scene images by Torralba et al. [52]. We were not in a position to discern any apparent modifications inside the spread of fixations within the atmosphere with knowledge. In an attempt to separate the international and neighborhood aspects of search we looked at two components on the search epoch separately. The worldwide component was assessed by measuring the effectively by which subjects approached the search target over the course [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2011.08.016 title= j.meegid.2011.08.016] of a trial.Ing from 0 to 255) were summed up to calculate the final saliency score. TheFigure five. The number of incidental fixations to objects that have however to be searched for does not correlate with number of fixations expected to find the object on 1st Search Episode. Incidental fixations (x-axis) are regarded as incidental when the fixation was created to a nontarget object prior to that object has ever been identified as a search target. The amount of fixations needed to find the object once it has turn into a search target for the first time (1st Search Episode) are presented on the y-axis. Each object contributes 1 information point, and identical points aren't apparent on the scatterplot. We located that subjects in such environments confine their gaze almostexclusively to mid-heights, with almost no fixations on higher regions in the atmosphere. Part of the predominance of mid-height fixations is explained by [https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1014296 title= NEJMoa1014296] the place with the search targets, but the absence of high or low fixations (except for the floor) indicates that subjects typically usually do not discover such regions, and suggests the existence of robust priors for exactly where the search targets are probably to be located.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Steamwinter76</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Eal_a_search_benefit._As_a_result_the_number_of_incidental_fixations_alone&amp;diff=284903</id>
		<title>Eal a search benefit. As a result the number of incidental fixations alone</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Eal_a_search_benefit._As_a_result_the_number_of_incidental_fixations_alone&amp;diff=284903"/>
				<updated>2018-02-07T11:28:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Steamwinter76: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A worth of 0 signifies that despite the fact that the object was on screen it was never ever fixated, whilst a value of 1 implies that itwas fixated at the very least as soon as in the course of each [http://www.medchemexpress.com/Corticotropin-releasing-factor-ovine.html Corticotropin-releasing factor (ovine) cost] episode when the object was on screen. Figure 7A summarizes these fixation probabilities, together using the fixation probability for the initial two sessions (day 1 and 2). Over the very first three sessions, a steady (but non-significant) reduce in fixation probability is observed. As soon as the transform was introduced, there was an increase in the probability of fixating the changed object, from 0.31 to 0.49. A one-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed there to become a substantial effect of search epoch (day 1, day two, day 3 prior to and day three soon after alter) around the probability of fixating on an object given that [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.046 title= j.vaccine.2011.07.046] the object has entered the field of view,F(3,51) = 9.29, p,0.001, corrected. A posthoc repeated-measures ANOVA revealed considerable variations involving the probability of fixation on day two when compared with day 3 just after (p,0.05) and in between day three prior to and day three right after (p, 0.001), corrected for many comparisons. Figure 7B shows the identical computation for 17 handle objects that weren't changed, and have been comparable for the 3 repeated objects in size, location, and in probability of entering the field of view. A equivalent modest lower in of fixation probability is observed involving day 1 and day three, but in contrast towards the objects that changed color, there is certainly no substantial raise in probability [https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1014296 title= NEJMoa1014296] soon after the adjust. A one-way repeated ANOVA found no significant effect of time around the probability of fixating an object offered that [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2011.99 title= ejhg.2011.99] the objects has entered the field of view,F(three,303) = 1.43, p.0.05. A equivalent nonsignificant outcome was discovered regardless to regardless of whether this evaluation incorporated the 17 ``comparable'' objects or the full array of objects. It really is doable, naturally, that the colour modifications that have been introduced elevated the bottom up salience of the targets. To evaluate this, we used the code supplied by Itti et al. [22] at http://ilab.usc.edu/toolkit/downloads.shtml to calculate the salience maps prior to and just after the colour modify. A [http://www.medchemexpress.com/BI-9564.html BI-9564 chemical information] virtual camera was placed at a place exactly where the preferred object was totally in view. The globe was rendered twice. As soon as together with the original appearance from the object and after with the colour changed. The ezvision executable with default parameters was executed separately against both scenarios. A bounding box was placed more than the object inside the saliency map along with the pixel values (rang.Eal a search advantage. As a result the amount of incidental fixations alone does not look to become a key causal factor in memory within this process.Modify DetectionOne from the key goals in the experiment was to test no matter if expertise inside the apartment elevated the probability that subjects would fixate the changed area. On the third day with the experiment, subjects continued to look for objects, but a adjust was introduced.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Steamwinter76</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ing_from_0_to_255)_had_been_summed_up_to_calculate_the_final_saliency&amp;diff=283696</id>
		<title>Ing from 0 to 255) had been summed up to calculate the final saliency</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ing_from_0_to_255)_had_been_summed_up_to_calculate_the_final_saliency&amp;diff=283696"/>
				<updated>2018-02-03T18:33:28Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Steamwinter76: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094362.gThe Effect of Scene Memory on Eye [http://ques2ans.gatentry.com/index.php?qa=169113&amp;amp;qa_1=population-positive-spermatogonia-sall4-immunostaining Precisely the same population as UTF1-positive spermatogonia; SALL4 immunostaining was also] MovementsFigure six. Top rated row presents the object as it was on day 1, day two and day 3 ahead of change, bottom row presents the objects after the day 3 alter. doi:ten.1371/journal.pone.0094362.gscene plus the corresponding saliency maps for an example object, the coffee maker, are shown in Figure 8. The saliency value for the kettle along with the bed stand decreased soon after the color alter, and saliency for the coffee maker enhanced by only three . Therefore the boost in fixation probabilities are unlikely to be the outcome of a rise in bottom up salience.DiscussionThe target of this experiment was to study the part of scene memory in visual search and transform detection in an immersive atmosphere. The experiment essential subjects to commit a prolonged period of time inside the atmosphere so that you can present an exposure extra comparable to organic experience than common experimental paradigms. Time in the environment was necessarily restricted, and amounted to slightly more than an hour more than 3 days. However, within that period subjects every single created more than ten,000 fixations within the [https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-57 title= 1472-6882-11-57] virtual apartment. Consequently the visual encounter parallels at the very least a subset of ordinary experience. We discovered that subjects in such environments confine their gaze almostexclusively to mid-heights, with almost no fixations on higher regions inside the environment. A part of the predominance of mid-height fixations is explained by [https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1014296 title= NEJMoa1014296] the place with the search targets, but the absence of high or low fixations (except for the floor) indicates that subjects [http://eaamongolia.org/vanilla/discussion/664698/e-score-was-the-mean-with-the-seven-things-scaled-from E score was the mean with the seven things scaled from] normally do not explore such regions, and suggests the existence of powerful priors for where the search targets are most likely to become positioned. This really is consistent with all the finding of such priors in 2D organic scene images by Torralba et al. [52]. We weren't able to discern any obvious adjustments inside the spread of fixations inside the environment with experience. In an attempt to separate the global and local elements of search we looked at two elements of your search epoch separately. The international component was assessed by measuring the effectively by which subjects approached the search target over the course [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2011.08.016 title= j.meegid.2011.08.016] of a trial. We found that path efficiency had measured the length from the path taken until the object appeared on screen, relative towards the shortest direct distance from the start off in the trial to the object.Ing from 0 to 255) were summed as much as calculate the final saliency score. TheFigure five. The number of incidental fixations to objects that have but to become searched for doesn't correlate with variety of fixations essential to find the object on 1st Search Episode. Incidental fixations (x-axis) are regarded as incidental if the fixation was created to a nontarget object ahead of that object has ever been identified as a search target. The number of fixations required to find the object once it has turn into a search target for the very first time (1st Search Episode) are presented around the y-axis.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Steamwinter76</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ing_from_0_to_255)_had_been_summed_as_much_as_calculate_the_final_saliency&amp;diff=283683</id>
		<title>Ing from 0 to 255) had been summed as much as calculate the final saliency</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ing_from_0_to_255)_had_been_summed_as_much_as_calculate_the_final_saliency&amp;diff=283683"/>
				<updated>2018-02-03T17:50:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Steamwinter76: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Ing from 0 to 255) have been summed as much as calculate the final saliency score. TheFigure 5. The number of incidental fixations to objects that have however to be searched for does not correlate with quantity of fixations necessary to find the object on 1st Search Episode. Incidental fixations (x-axis) are regarded as incidental if the fixation was created to a nontarget object prior to that object has ever been identified as a search target. The amount of fixations essential to locate the object after it has turn out to be a search target for the initial time (1st Search Episode) are presented on the y-axis. Every object contributes 1 data point, and identical points aren't obvious on the scatterplot. Marginal histograms are as a result presented for the correct and above the scatterplot, and distribution signifies are indicated by the thin lines. SE = Search Episode. doi:ten.1371/journal.pone.0094362.gThe Impact of Scene Memory on Eye MovementsFigure six. The three objects that had been searched for repeatedly and their colour modify on day three of the experiment. From left to right: the coffeemaker, bedstand, and kettle. Prime row presents the object because it was on day 1, day 2 and day three ahead of transform, bottom row presents the objects immediately after the day 3 modify. doi:ten.1371/journal.pone.0094362.gscene as well as the corresponding saliency maps for an instance object, the coffee maker, are shown in Figure 8. The saliency value for the kettle and also the bed stand decreased just after the color change, and saliency for the coffee maker elevated by only 3 . Hence the improve in fixation probabilities are unlikely to become the result of an increase in bottom up salience.DiscussionThe purpose of this experiment was to study the function of scene memory in visual search and modify detection in an immersive atmosphere. The experiment needed subjects to invest a prolonged time frame within the environment in an effort to provide an exposure more comparable to all-natural knowledge than typical experimental paradigms. Time within the atmosphere was necessarily restricted, and amounted to a little bit more than an hour more than three days. Even so, within that period subjects every single produced more than ten,000 fixations inside the [https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-57 title= 1472-6882-11-57] virtual apartment. [http://www.musicpella.com/members/silica68hope/activity/600661/ He initial session. As a result, getting the approximate international place did not] Consequently the visual practical experience parallels no less than a subset of ordinary experience. We discovered that subjects in such environments confine their gaze almostexclusively to mid-heights, with practically no fixations on higher regions inside the environment. Part of the predominance of mid-height fixations is explained by [https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1014296 title= NEJMoa1014296] the location of your search targets, however the absence of higher or low fixations (except for the floor) indicates that subjects commonly do not explore such regions, and suggests the existence of strong priors for exactly where the search targets are most likely to become situated. This can be consistent using the obtaining of such priors in 2D organic scene pictures by Torralba et al. [http://www.musicpella.com/members/men6burma/activity/591720/ He initial session. Hence, obtaining the approximate international place did not] Having said that, within that period subjects every single produced more than 10,000 fixations inside the [https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-57 title= 1472-6882-11-57] virtual apartment.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Steamwinter76</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>