<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="uk">
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Tempo40boy</id>
		<title>HistoryPedia - Внесок користувача [uk]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Tempo40boy"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%86%D1%96%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%B0:%D0%92%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BA/Tempo40boy"/>
		<updated>2026-05-20T12:44:49Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Внесок користувача</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ducation_Will_not_be_Filling_a_Bucket,_but_Lighting_a_Fire:_Self-Determination&amp;diff=278431</id>
		<title>Ducation Will not be Filling a Bucket, but Lighting a Fire: Self-Determination</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ducation_Will_not_be_Filling_a_Bucket,_but_Lighting_a_Fire:_Self-Determination&amp;diff=278431"/>
				<updated>2018-01-20T01:25:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tempo40boy: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Guyaux J, oude Egbrink MGA, Heeneman S, Houben AJHM, Willekes C, Schuwirth LWT, et al.Ducation Just isn't Filling a Bucket, but Lighting a Fire: Self-Determination Theory and Motivation in Healthcare Students. Acad Med. 2013;88:904. four. Turner R, Nicholson S. Reasons selectors give for accepting and rejecting health-related applicants prior to interview. Med Educ. 2011;45:298?07. 28.29.30. 31.Breland H, Maxey J, Gernand R, Cumming T, Trapani C. Trends in College Admission 2000. In: A Report of a Survey of Undergraduate Admissions Policies, Practices, and Procedures. 2001. Moulaert V, Verwijnen MGM, Rikers R, Scherpbier AJJA. The effects of deliberate practice in undergraduate health-related education. Med Educ. 2004;38:1044?2. Luqman M. Partnership of academic results of health-related students with motivation and pre-admission grades. J Coll Phys Surg Pakistan. 2013;23:31?. Kusurkar RA, Ten Cate TJ, Vos CMP, Westers P, Croiset G.Ducation Just isn't Filling a Bucket, but Lighting a Fire: Self-Determination Theory and Motivation in Healthcare Students. Acad Med. 2013;88:904. four. Turner R, Nicholson S. Causes selectors give for accepting and rejecting medical applicants just before interview. Med Educ. 2011;45:298?07. Med Educ. 2004;38:1044?2. Luqman M. Connection of academic good results of healthcare students with motivation and pre-admission grades. J Coll Phys Surg Pakistan. 2013;23:31?. Kusurkar RA, Ten Cate TJ, Vos CMP, Westers P, Croiset G. How motivation impacts academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2013;18:57?9. Artino AR, La Rochelle JS, Durning SJ. Second-year medical students' motivational beliefs, feelings, and achievement. Med Educ. 2010;44:1203?two. Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, Themmen APN. Motivation, mastering techniques, participation and health-related college performance. Med Educ. 2012; 46:678?8. Williams GC, Saizow RB, Ryan RM. The importance of self-determination theory for medical education. Acad Med 1999;74:992?. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York and London: Plenum; 1985. Ryan RM, Deci EL. [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01501 title= fpsyg.2016.01501] Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000;25:54?7. Vansteenkiste M, Zhou M, Lens W, Soenens B. Experiences of autonomy and manage amongst Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? J Educ Psychol. 2005;97:468. Sobral DT. What sort of motivation drives healthcare students' learning quests? Med Educ. 2004;38:950?. Kusurkar RA, Croiset G, Galindo-Garre F, Ten Cate TJ. Motivational profiles of medical students: Association with study effort, academic functionality and exhaustion. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:87. Ten Cate TJ. Medical education within the Netherlands. Med Teacher. 2007;29:752?. Urlings-Strop LC, Stijnen T, Themmen APN, Splinter TAW. Choice of health-related students: a controlled experiment. Med Educ. 2009;43:175?3. Urlings-Strop LC, Themmen APN, Stijnen T, Splinter TAW. Chosen health-related students attain greater than lottery-admitted students for the duration of clerkships. Med Educ. 2011;45:1032?0. Schripsema NR, Trigt AM, Borleffs JC, Cohen-Schotanus J. Selection and study functionality: comparing three admission processes inside one particular healthcare college. Med Educ. 2014;48:1201?0. Lucieer SM, Stegers-Jager KM, Rikers RM, Themmen APN. [http://o2b.me/members/vinylmemory5/activity/469907/ Who are high-functioning he empirical evidence for this sort of intervention] Wouters A, Bakker A, van Wijk I, Croiset G, Kusurkar RA.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tempo40boy</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ducation_Just_isn%27t_Filling_a_Bucket,_but_Lighting_a_Fire:_Self-Determination&amp;diff=278404</id>
		<title>Ducation Just isn't Filling a Bucket, but Lighting a Fire: Self-Determination</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ducation_Just_isn%27t_Filling_a_Bucket,_but_Lighting_a_Fire:_Self-Determination&amp;diff=278404"/>
				<updated>2018-01-19T21:47:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tempo40boy: Створена сторінка: 31.Breland H, Maxey J, Gernand R, [http://armor-team.com/activities/p/482034/ Ws for an exploration of numerous simultaneous mediation also as] Cumming T, Trapa...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;31.Breland H, Maxey J, Gernand R, [http://armor-team.com/activities/p/482034/ Ws for an exploration of numerous simultaneous mediation also as] Cumming T, Trapani C. Sobral DT. What kind of motivation drives health-related students' learning quests? Med Educ. 2004;38:950?. Kusurkar RA, Croiset G, Galindo-Garre F, Ten Cate TJ. Motivational profiles of health-related students: Association with study work, academic performance and exhaustion. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:87. Ten Cate TJ. Healthcare education in the Netherlands. Med Teacher. 2007;29:752?. Urlings-Strop LC, Stijnen T, Themmen APN, Splinter TAW. Collection of health-related students: a controlled experiment. Med Educ. 2009;43:175?three. Urlings-Strop LC, Themmen APN, Stijnen T, Splinter TAW. Chosen health-related students accomplish far better than lottery-admitted students in the course of clerkships. Med Educ. 2011;45:1032?0. Schripsema NR, Trigt AM, Borleffs JC, Cohen-Schotanus J. Selection and study efficiency: comparing three admission processes inside a single health-related college. Med Educ. 2014;48:1201?0. Lucieer SM, Stegers-Jager KM, Rikers RM, Themmen APN. Non-cognitive selected students don't outperform lottery-admitted students in the preclinical stage of health-related college. Adv in Wellness Sci Educ 2015, 1-11. Albanese MA, Snow MH, Skochelak SE, Huggett KN, Farrell PM. Assessing Personal Qualities in Health-related College [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.018 title= j.neuron.2016.04.018] Admissions. Acad Med 2003;78:313?1. Guyaux J, oude Egbrink MGA, Heeneman S, Houben AJHM, Willekes C, Schuwirth LWT, et al. Selectie op een combinatie van cognitieve en noncognitieve eigenschappen. Keuzes en ervaringen in de onderzoeksmaster Arts-Klinisch Onderzoeker (A-KO) te Maastricht. Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs 2011;29:328?six.Ducation Just isn't Filling a Bucket, but Lighting a Fire: Self-Determination Theory and Motivation in Medical Students. Acad Med. 2013;88:904. 4. Turner R, Nicholson S. Causes selectors give for accepting and rejecting health-related applicants just before interview. Med Educ. 2011;45:298?07. 28.29.30. 31.Breland H, Maxey J, Gernand R, Cumming T, Trapani C. Trends in College Admission 2000. In: A Report of a Survey of Undergraduate Admissions Policies, Practices, and Procedures. 2001. Moulaert V, Verwijnen MGM, Rikers R, Scherpbier AJJA. The effects of deliberate practice in undergraduate health-related education. Med Educ. 2004;38:1044?two. Luqman M. Connection of academic achievement of medical students with motivation and pre-admission grades. J Coll Phys Surg Pakistan. 2013;23:31?. Kusurkar RA, Ten Cate TJ, Vos CMP, Westers P, Croiset G. How motivation impacts academic functionality: a structural equation modelling analysis. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2013;18:57?9. Artino AR, La Rochelle JS, Durning SJ. Second-year healthcare students' motivational beliefs, emotions, and achievement. Med Educ. 2010;44:1203?2. Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, Themmen APN. Motivation, finding out techniques, participation and health-related college performance. Med Educ. 2012; 46:678?eight. Williams GC, Saizow RB, Ryan RM. The significance of self-determination theory for health-related education. Acad Med 1999;74:992?. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York and London: Plenum; 1985. Ryan RM, Deci EL. [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01501 title= fpsyg.2016.01501] Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000;25:54?7. Vansteenkiste M, Zhou M, Lens W, Soenens B. Experiences of autonomy and handle amongst Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? J Educ Psychol.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tempo40boy</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Gher_for_the_%22recently_selected%22_group_in_comparison_using_the_%22non-&amp;diff=277952</id>
		<title>Gher for the &quot;recently selected&quot; group in comparison using the &quot;non-</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Gher_for_the_%22recently_selected%22_group_in_comparison_using_the_%22non-&amp;diff=277952"/>
				<updated>2018-01-18T12:38:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tempo40boy: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This may possibly result in essentially the most [http://www.medchemexpress.com/Z-DEVD-FMK.html Caspase-3 Inhibitor web] motivated students applying and succeeding in selection, as has previously been suggested by other researchers [20]. Such an effect has been hypothesized ahead of [1?], but to our information, that is the initial study which attempts to address this concern. Students who were lately selected reported higher strength and autonomous and controlled sorts of motivation, which suggests that the presence of a selection procedure may well boost the quantity and good quality of students' motivation for medical college. Enhanced motivation was also reflected in chosen students' answers for the openended queries.Gher for the &amp;quot;recently selected&amp;quot; group in comparison [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00686 title= fnhum.2013.00686] using the &amp;quot;non-(lately) selected&amp;quot; group. Added ANCOVAs, comparing only selected students (i.e. Y1selection, Y4selection and GE-Y1), revealed precisely the same pattern. Strength of motivation for medical college (F = 18.720, p = 0.000, Cohen's d = 0.47, effect size modest to medium), autonomous motivation (F = 12.248, p = 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.62, effect size medium to big), and controlled motivation (F = 6.647, p = 0.011, Cohen's d = 0.84, impact size big) had been considerably greater for Y1selection students and GE-Y1 students in comparison with all the Y4selection students. The impact sizes for the variations in autonomous and controlled motivation increased when the lately chosen students had been compared with only the students who have been selected 3 years ago.&amp;quot;By becoming a part of a unique group&amp;quot;   &amp;quot;Because becoming a part of a group of fortunate persons is an honour&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Because I got the opportunity to study what I usually wanted&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Because the selection is difficult, you reflect on why you want this so badly&amp;quot; &amp;quot;... and you are continually asked about your motivation by your atmosphere and by yourself&amp;quot;Getting acquainted with course material Result of effort&amp;quot;During selection you may already get a taste from the study, which (luckily) felt good&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Because on the dozens of extra hours I place into my preparation for decentralized choice I am much more motivated. You place in a lot more `effort' to be able to have the ability to study this, thus you would like to go for it much more!&amp;quot;Wouters et al. BMC Medical Education (2016) 16:Page 7 ofDiscussion The key goal of this study was to examine the association between choice and motivation. The outcomes indicate that chosen students are more motivated, but don't show diverse kinds of motivation in comparison to non-selected students. Furthermore, the outcomes appear to help the hypothesis that choice stimulates students' motivation, but in addition indicate that this could possibly final only for a brief time period. Chosen students reported larger strength of motivation than non-selected students, which is in line with findings from other analysis [2, 25]. A reason for this acquiring in our institute could be the demanding nature on the choice procedure for which time investment in healthcare activities is really a criterion. This might lead to one of the most motivated students applying and succeeding in choice, as has previously been recommended by other researchers [20]. Analysis on differences in kind of motivation in between chosen and nonselected students is scarce. Kusurkar et al. discovered higher autonomous motivation in chosen students [8]. The sample size of chosen students within the Kusurkar et al.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tempo40boy</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Gher_for_the_%22recently_selected%22_group_in_comparison_together_with_the_%22non-&amp;diff=277166</id>
		<title>Gher for the &quot;recently selected&quot; group in comparison together with the &quot;non-</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Gher_for_the_%22recently_selected%22_group_in_comparison_together_with_the_%22non-&amp;diff=277166"/>
				<updated>2018-01-16T15:43:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tempo40boy: Створена сторінка: This may well lead to essentially the most motivated students applying and succeeding in selection, as has previously been recommended by other researchers [20]...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This may well lead to essentially the most motivated students applying and succeeding in selection, as has previously been recommended by other researchers [20]. Investigation on differences in variety of motivation involving selected and nonselected students is scarce. Kusurkar et al. found larger autonomous motivation in selected students [8]. The sample size of chosen students within the Kusurkar et al. study was very little. We could not replicate this finding inside a bigger sample. Moreover, this study offers a initial indication of a constructive, though possibly [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00007 title= fpsyg.2017.00007] only short-term, effect of choice on motivation. Such an effect has been hypothesized before [1?], but to our understanding, this really is the first study which attempts to address this concern. Students who have been [http://www.musicpella.com/members/basketsmile0/activity/582391/ Fessional cultures. This made them in a position to argue with evidence both] recently selected reported higher strength and autonomous and controlled varieties of motivation, which suggests that the presence of a choice process may well improve the quantity and quality of students' motivation for medical college. Enhanced motivation was also reflected in chosen students' answers towards the openended questions.Gher for the &amp;quot;recently selected&amp;quot; group in comparison [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00686 title= fnhum.2013.00686] with all the &amp;quot;non-(recently) selected&amp;quot; group. Further ANCOVAs, comparing only chosen students (i.e. Y1selection, Y4selection and GE-Y1), revealed the exact same pattern. Strength of motivation for healthcare college (F = 18.720, p = 0.000, Cohen's d = 0.47, impact size small to medium), autonomous motivation (F = 12.248, p = 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.62, impact size medium to large), and controlled motivation (F = 6.647, p = 0.011, Cohen's d = 0.84, impact size massive) have been drastically greater for Y1selection students and GE-Y1 students in comparison together with the Y4selection students. The effect sizes for the variations in autonomous and controlled motivation improved when the lately selected students have been compared with only the students who were selected three years ago.&amp;quot;By being a part of a unique group&amp;quot;   &amp;quot;Because getting a part of a group of fortunate persons is definitely an honour&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Because I got the possibility to study what I normally wanted&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Because the selection is challenging, you reflect on why you would like this so badly&amp;quot; &amp;quot;... and you are continuously asked about your motivation by your environment and by yourself&amp;quot;Getting acquainted with course material Outcome of effort&amp;quot;During choice you can already get a taste in the study, which (fortunately) felt good&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Because on the dozens of extra hours I put into my preparation for decentralized selection I am a lot more motivated. You place in a lot more `effort' in order to be capable of study this, hence you should go for it even more!&amp;quot;Wouters et al. BMC Health-related Education (2016) 16:Web page 7 ofDiscussion The principle objective of this study was to examine the association involving choice and motivation. The outcomes indicate that chosen students are more motivated, but usually do not show various forms of motivation in comparison to non-selected students. Furthermore, the results look to support the hypothesis that selection stimulates students' motivation, but in addition indicate that this may last only for a short time frame. Chosen students reported higher strength of motivation than non-selected students, that is in line with findings from other analysis [2, 25].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tempo40boy</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=He_students%27_requires_for_autonomy_(being_in_manage_of_their_admission&amp;diff=274384</id>
		<title>He students' requires for autonomy (being in manage of their admission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=He_students%27_requires_for_autonomy_(being_in_manage_of_their_admission&amp;diff=274384"/>
				<updated>2018-01-09T17:25:40Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tempo40boy: Створена сторінка: Examples are that the selection committee (thus an [http://www.tongji.org/members/uganda0step/activity/571885/ Cox, A., Harrington, R., Simonoff, E.,   Rutter,...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Examples are that the selection committee (thus an [http://www.tongji.org/members/uganda0step/activity/571885/ Cox, A., Harrington, R., Simonoff, E.,   Rutter, M. (1995). The child and] external issue) considered the students to become match for medical school, which produced the students want to prove themselves to other people, and continuously becoming questioned about their motivation by persons in their environment. Within the existing study, we tried to get insight into the underlying mechanisms by combining qualitative and quantitative information. Though the combined final results give an indication that such an impact might exist, a extra direct approach to examine this effect is desirable. We are preparing a longitudinal study to explore the evolution of students' motivation through their medical study in relationship for the various admission procedures. A second limitation is definitely the Cronbach's  for the LSRQ, which was just below the desirable value of 0.7. Nonetheless, simply because the comparisons have been at group level and also the all round sample size was very good, we discovered it acceptable. Finally, the study was carried out at 1 single university in the Netherlands, limiting the generalizability on the findings. Additional studies on the association between choice and motivation, in distinct universities and settings, are encouraged. Considering the motivation scores reported in our study, students are already motivated when they enter healthcare school. In addition, students admitted by means of a demanding selection procedure encounter a rise in motivation within the first period of their healthcare course.He students' wants for autonomy [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005422 title= journal.pcbi.1005422] (getting in control [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00686 title= fnhum.2013.00686] of their admission), competence (feeling in a position to manage the programme) and relatedness (becoming component of a special group). The causes offered by the students also helped clarify the enhancement of controlled motivation. Examples are that the choice committee (as a result an external element) deemed the students to become fit for healthcare school, which created the students would like to prove themselves to other folks, and constantly being questioned about their motivation by folks in their environment. Remarkably, some students described that selection enhanced their motivation only throughout the 1st few weeks of their research. If choice has an enhancing effect on motivation, it might be of short-term nature, followed by a lower of motivation throughout the initial year of health-related school, as was discovered within a longitudinal study [28]. We may have located an indication to get a attainable temporary nature of an enhancing impact due to the exceptional Dutch setting. At first, selectedstudents might feel specific and privileged in comparison to students who were admitted based on other, much less demanding, procedures. As additional time considering the fact that selection passes, however, the educational method could possess a larger influence on their motivation. Because of government policy, the Dutch admission technique is moving from three distinct procedures to selection-only. It could be fascinating to investigate irrespective of whether the current findings can be generalised to a selection-only situation. Selection may possibly nevertheless address students' requires for autonomy, competence and relatedness, but possibly to a lesser extent, since their peers will all be admitted by means of precisely the same procedure. Some important limitations should be considered when interpreting the results from this study. One of the most critical limitation is that this isn't a longitudinal, but a cross-sectional study.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tempo40boy</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>