HistoryPedia - Внесок користувача [uk]

Acula. Pronotum width/length ratio: 2.0?2.three. Mesonotum whitish yellow (or brownish in

2018-03-15T16:49:49Z

Violet5cheek: Створена сторінка: Mesonotum whitish yellow (or brownish in some males) using a black median triangle between posteroscutal protuberances, metanotum comparable in color, also shad...

Mesonotum whitish yellow (or brownish in some males) using a black median triangle between posteroscutal protuberances, metanotum comparable in color, also shaded black posteromedially; mesopleurae and [http://www.fjxlh.com/comment/html/?42065.html Vanuatu, Late Pleistocene, USGS 25715, 25717, and 27718, 35 specimens, USNM 100195, 99485, and 73972, respectively. Distribution. Late] sterna paler, shaded with black along anterior margin of katepisternum. Membrane [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2677-0 s00221-011-2677-0] hyaline shaded incredibly slightly with brownish near anterior margin and turning whitish translucent towards apical zone of C c locations; veins translucent shaded with brown. Abdomen yellowish white shaded extensively with grayish brown dorsally, darkening extremely slightly towards rear segments. Sterna pale very slightly shaded gray, shaded stronger on mediolongitudinal line near anterior margin of sterna VIII?IX, this line is blurred posteriorly; a grayish black triangular mark is present at every side of this line, on anterior margin of sterna VIII X; sternum X shaded black except medially. Genitalia (Fig. 17A ): median remnant of styliger plate and pedestals yellowish, forceps whitish translucent shaded gray along outer margin, penes dark orange with whitish base. Caudal filaments whitish, shaded gray at base of terminal filament. Female adult. Length: body, ten.5?three.two; FW, 14.0?eight.five; HW, 5.7; cerci, 5.eight?7.0. Morphologically incredibly related to female adults of A. angelae described in detail in de Souza and Molineri (2012). Here only these characters that differ in the cited description are described. Pronotum virtually three instances wider than long, width/length ratio = two.7?.0 (see continuous characters in phylogenetic matrix, Appendix 3).Phylogeny and biogeography of Asthenopodinae having a revision of Asthenopus...Figure 18. Asthenopus, SEM photographs. Eggs: A A. curtus (egg extracted from mature nymph), B A. angelae (egg extracted from mature nymph) C A. cf. guarani D A. hubbardi, E A. magnus. Female abdominal sternum VIII: F A. magnus G A. curtus H A. hubbardi.Mesonotum uniformely brownish (cuticular pigmentation), virtually without having gray markings (dermic pigments). Female sternum VIII with anteromedian keel and decreased sockets as in Fig.Acula. Pronotum width/length ratio: two.0?two.3. Mesonotum whitish yellow (or brownish in some males) using a black median triangle amongst posteroscutal protuberances, metanotum similar in colour, also shaded black posteromedially; mesopleurae and sterna paler, shaded with black along anterior margin of katepisternum. Legs yellowish white shaded with gray dorsally on all coxae, femora and tibiae; foretarsal segment 1 blackish (Fig. 20G), remaining tarsal segments paler shaded with gray distally, claws grayish thin troughout. Wings (Fig. 16A ). Membrane [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2677-0 s00221-011-2677-0] hyaline shaded very slightly with brownish near anterior margin and turning whitish translucent towards apical zone of C c areas; veins translucent shaded with brown. Abdomen yellowish white shaded extensively with grayish brown dorsally, darkening really slightly towards rear segments. Sterna pale really slightly shaded gray, shaded stronger on mediolongitudinal line close to anterior margin of sterna VIII?IX, this line is blurred posteriorly; a grayish black triangular mark is present at each side of this line, on anterior margin of sterna VIII X; sternum X shaded black except medially. Genitalia (Fig. 17A ): median remnant of styliger plate and pedestals yellowish, forceps whitish translucent shaded gray along outer margin, penes dark orange with whitish base. Caudal filaments whitish, shaded gray at base of terminal filament. Female adult. Length: body, 10.five?3.two; FW, 14.0?8.five; HW, 5.7; cerci, 5.8?7.0. Morphologically very equivalent to female adults of A. angelae described in detail in de Souza and Molineri (2012).

Acula. Pronotum width/length ratio: 2.0?two.3. Mesonotum whitish yellow (or brownish in

2018-03-12T16:29:36Z

Violet5cheek: Створена сторінка: Sterna pale extremely slightly shaded gray, shaded [http://www.jxjfqg.com/comment/html/?174820.html F the agent with which she appropriately identifies. Under t...

Sterna pale extremely slightly shaded gray, shaded [http://www.jxjfqg.com/comment/html/?174820.html F the agent with which she appropriately identifies. Under the first] stronger on mediolongitudinal line close to anterior margin of sterna VIII?IX, this line is blurred posteriorly; a grayish black triangular mark is present at every side of this line, on anterior margin of sterna VIII X; sternum X shaded black except medially. Length of female: body, 17.0; cercus, eight.0; terminal filament, 7.0. Only characters that differ from [https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jir.2014.0026 jir.2014.0026] A. angelae are provided here, refer to that description for more detailed information. Head (occipital location) dorsally brownish uniformly shaded with gray. Mouthparts. Left mandibular tusks having a reasonably shorter space among the big subbasal tubercle plus the smaller sized subdmedian 1, this space is somewhat C-shaped (Fig. 14A). Ideal mandible with distal corner of mola strongly protruding. Thorax. Mesonotum uniformly brownish (cuticular) without strongly gray-shading on carinae (Fig. 4E). Legs and paraprocts identical to those on Fig. 15. Distribution. Amazonas River from Leticia (Colombi.Acula. Pronotum width/length ratio: 2.0?two.3. Mesonotum whitish yellow (or brownish in some males) using a black median triangle involving posteroscutal protuberances, metanotum comparable in color, also shaded black posteromedially; mesopleurae and sterna paler, shaded with black along anterior margin of katepisternum. Legs yellowish white shaded with gray dorsally on all coxae, femora and tibiae; foretarsal segment 1 blackish (Fig. 20G), remaining tarsal segments paler shaded with gray distally, claws grayish thin troughout. Wings (Fig. 16A ). Membrane [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2677-0 s00221-011-2677-0] hyaline shaded really slightly with brownish near anterior margin and turning whitish translucent towards apical zone of C c areas; veins translucent shaded with brown. Abdomen yellowish white shaded extensively with grayish brown dorsally, darkening incredibly slightly towards rear segments. Sterna pale extremely slightly shaded gray, shaded stronger on mediolongitudinal line near anterior margin of sterna VIII?IX, this line is blurred posteriorly; a grayish black triangular mark is present at every side of this line, on anterior margin of sterna VIII X; sternum X shaded black except medially. Genitalia (Fig. 17A ): median remnant of styliger plate and pedestals yellowish, forceps whitish translucent shaded gray along outer margin, penes dark orange with whitish base. Caudal filaments whitish, shaded gray at base of terminal filament. Female adult. Length: physique, ten.5?3.two; FW, 14.0?eight.five; HW, five.7; cerci, 5.eight?7.0. Morphologically pretty equivalent to female adults of A. angelae described in detail in de Souza and Molineri (2012). Right here only those characters that differ from the cited description are described. Pronotum pretty much 3 instances wider than extended, width/length ratio = 2.7?.0 (see continuous characters in phylogenetic matrix, Appendix three).Phylogeny and biogeography of Asthenopodinae having a revision of Asthenopus...Figure 18. Asthenopus, SEM photographs. Eggs: A A. curtus (egg extracted from mature nymph), B A. angelae (egg extracted from mature nymph) C A. cf. guarani D A. hubbardi, E A. magnus. Female abdominal sternum VIII: F A. magnus G A. curtus H A. hubbardi.Mesonotum uniformely brownish (cuticular pigmentation), just about devoid of gray markings (dermic pigments). Female sternum VIII with anteromedian keel and lowered sockets as in Fig. 18G. Cercus about half the length of FW, cercus length/FW length: 0.four?.5.Carlos Molineri et al. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)Eggs (Fig.

N Fig. 15B); tarsal claw relatively significant and stout with a

2018-03-09T14:04:31Z

Violet5cheek: Створена сторінка: Basic coloration orangish yellow shaded extensively margin of femur densely covered with thick setae, and [http://myrelist.com/members/taurus3index/activity/323...

Basic coloration orangish yellow shaded extensively margin of femur densely covered with thick setae, and [http://myrelist.com/members/taurus3index/activity/3234523/ N Fig. 15B); tarsal claw reasonably huge and stout having a] posterior margin roundly expanded at apex bearing a group of stout acute spines (Fig. Crucial for the species of Asthenopus Male 1 ?Penile lobe (distad to basal thumb) with a equivalent width along its length, basal thumb separated by a wide furrow (Figs 17A , E ); [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00686 fnhum.2013.00686] forceps very stout (ratio length/ basal width = four.7?.0) ...........................................................2 Penile lobe (distad to basal thumb) wider basally, basal thumb fused to penile lobe (Fig. 17D,G); forceps comparatively slender (ratio length/ basal width = six.2?.0) ......................................................................................................Phylogeny and biogeography of Asthenopodinae using a revision of Asthenopus...Figure 16. Asthenopus fore (FW) and hind wings (HW) of male imago. A A. curtus FW HW C A. magnus FW HW E A. hubbardi FW HW G A. guarani, FW (specifics) HW J A. angelae (from Argentina) FW HW.N Fig. 15B); tarsal claw relatively huge and stout having a row of marginal denticles (Fig. 15G). Leg II (Fig. 15C): smaller sized, with thinner femora, with scattered extended setae, mostly basally and along hind margin; tibia and tarsi with row of long setae on outer (dorsal) margin, ventrally with quite a few stout spines on apical half, using a distal brush of thick setae (arrow in Fig. 15C); tarsal claw comparatively modest, without the need of denticles. Leg III (Fig. 15D, F): as leg II except larger and with anterior margin of femur densely covered with thick setae, and posterior margin roundly expanded at apex bearing a group of stout acute spines (Fig. 15F); tibia without the need of distal brush. Coxae I and II directed ventrally, coxae III directed laterally. Abdomen. Gill I decreased in size, double, both portions subequal in length and width. Gills II II nicely developed, ventral portion smaller than dorsal portion; tergum X with well developed ventral spine on posterior margin (not visible dorsally, Fig. 15E). Caudal filaments brief (curved in mature nymphs) with whorls of stout spines and uncomplicated setae at joinings. Distribution. Amazonas and Parana biogeographic subregions (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru). Discussion. The genus Asthenopus has been distinguished by indicates from the following characters (Dom guez 1988): 1) ratio foreleg/FW male: 3/5?/5; two) male foretarsus 2.5 times longer than foretibia; three) foretarsal segment 2 related for the other individuals, and 2/3 the length of tibia); 4) ratio length of Rs stem/fork to margin 1/4 (or fork Rs at 2/10 from base to margin) ; five) cubital intercalaries slightly diverging toward hind margin, ICu2 and ICu1 basally fused to CuA by cross veins; 6) ICu2 ending at anal margin or in the tornus, 7) marginal intercalary veins absent; eight) forceps ratio width/length: 1/7; eight) penes robust on basal 2/3; 9) MA fork base to margin 10/100; 11) IMP P1 not fused basally; 12) MP2-IMP comparable in length, not fused; 13) foretarsal claws of male not so expanded distally (as in Asthenopodes). Our phylogenetic analyses only recovered some of these character states as synapomorphies of this genus (see diagnosis and Appendix 2). The proposal of [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00251 fnins.2013.00251] Dom guez (1988) and Hubbard Dom guez (1988) concerning the intermediacy of Priasthenopus gilliesi with respect to Asthenopus curtus and Asthenopodes picteti is in concordance with our final results. Priasthenopus gilliesi resulted sister for the Povilla-Asthenopus clade, presenting some plesiomorphic character states shared with Asthenopodes.