HistoryPedia - Внесок користувача [uk]

Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes brief (Fig. 17C

2018-03-30T07:10:33Z

Zone39room:

14A); right mandible with distal [http://www.sdlongzhou.net/comment/html/?117013.html . 53.3] and the junior name is permanently invalid (but see Article 23.9.five) except] corner of mola strongly protruding ................A. curtus Around the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space involving the subbasal plus the submedian tubercles is longer and straighter (Figs 14B ); suitable mandible with distal corner of mola not strongly protruding ......................two Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length: 1.59?.62 (Fig. 14B, F)................................................................................................. A. angelae Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00334 fpsyg.2015.00334] 142; Ulmer 1942: 105; Traver 1956b: 7; [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.021 j.cub.2015.05.021] Kimmins 1960: 312; Sattler 1967: 104; Berner 1978: 103; Hubbard 1982a: 270;.Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes brief (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................three Penes long, apical spine slightly marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes brief, apical spine nicely marked, median remnant of styliger plate standard (Fig. 17C) .......................................................................... A. hubbardi FW 9.five?0.1; penile lobe strongly widened basally (ratio length / basal width = two.9, Fig. 17G) and using a little distal indentation close to apical spine (arrow in Fig. 17G)................................................................................. A. magnus FW 7.0?.5 mm; penile lobe not so wide at the base (ratio length / basal width = four.0?.0, Fig. 17D); devoid of apical indentation as above .............A. angelaeFemale and eggs of Asthenopus species are strongly similar. They might be identified by comparison with co-occurring males. Nonetheless the eggs extracted from female adults or mature nymphs may be keyed as follows: 1 Disk like structures on the equatorial region somewhat effectively separated from every other, separation about 0.six or a lot more of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18B, C, E)...........................................................................................................Carlos Molineri et al. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)?2 ?Disk like structures around the equatorial region pretty much touching each and every other, maximum separation about 0.three or less of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18A, D).... ...................................................................................... A. curtus / A. hubbardi Using a group of two? incredibly small disks beneath each disk like structure (Fig. 18C) ............................................................................................A. guarani Only smooth chorion beneath the disk like structures (Fig. 18B, E) ................ ................................................................................ A. angelae / A. magnusNymphs (only three species recognized, nearly undistinguishable, the characters below needs to be confirmed with all the study of more material) 1 ?2 ?On the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space in between the subbasal plus the submedian tubercles is quick and strongly concave (Fig. 14A); correct mandible with distal corner of mola strongly protruding ................A. curtus On the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space involving the subbasal and also the submedian tubercles is longer and straighter (Figs 14B ); proper mandible with distal corner of mola not strongly protruding ......................two Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length: 1.59?.62 (Fig. 14B, F)................................................................................................. A. angelae Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length

Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes quick (Fig. 17C

2018-03-27T13:58:46Z

Zone39room:

magnus[http://www.shuyigo.com/comment/html/?451984.html Sent an undescribed species. Truncatoflabellum crassum (Milne Edwards Haime, 1848) Fig. 5C] nymphs (only 3 species known, virtually undistinguishable, the characters under really should be confirmed using the study of much more material) 1 ?two ?On the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space among the subbasal as well as the submedian tubercles is brief and strongly concave (Fig. 14C, E, G) ......................................................................... A. magnus (only known from Napo, Ecuador) / A. guarani (Paran?and Uruguay basins)Asthenopus curtus (Hagen) Figs 4E, 14A, 16A , 17A , 18A, G, 20G Palingenia albifilum var.; Walker 1853: 554. Palingenia curta Hagen 1861: 304. Campsurus curtus; Eaton 1868: 84; Eaton 1883: 40; Ulmer 1921: 240. Asthenopus curtus; Eaton 1871: 59; Ulmer 1920c: 107; Ulmer 1921: 240; Lestage 1922b: [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00334 fpsyg.2015.00334] 142; Ulmer 1942: 105; Traver 1956b: 7; [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.021 j.cub.2015.05.021] Kimmins 1960: 312; Sattler 1967: 104; Berner 1978: 103; Hubbard 1982a: 270;.Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes short (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................three Penes long, apical spine slightly marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes short, apical spine nicely marked, median remnant of styliger plate regular (Fig. 17C) .......................................................................... A. hubbardi FW 9.5?0.1; penile lobe strongly widened basally (ratio length / basal width = 2.9, Fig. 17G) and having a little distal indentation close to apical spine (arrow in Fig. 17G)................................................................................. A. magnus FW 7.0?.five mm; penile lobe not so wide at the base (ratio length / basal width = 4.0?.0, Fig. 17D); with no apical indentation as above .............A. angelaeFemale and eggs of Asthenopus species are strongly comparable. They may be identified by comparison with co-occurring males. Nevertheless the eggs extracted from female adults or mature nymphs may well be keyed as follows: 1 Disk like structures on the equatorial region relatively well separated from each and every other, separation about 0.six or more of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18B, C, E)...........................................................................................................Carlos Molineri et al. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)?two ?Disk like structures around the equatorial region almost touching every other, maximum separation about 0.three or much less of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18A, D).... ......................................................................................Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes short (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................3 Penes long, apical spine slightly marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes short, apical spine properly marked, median remnant of styliger plate typical (Fig.Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes quick (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................3 Penes lengthy, apical spine slightly marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes brief, apical spine nicely marked, median remnant of styliger plate standard (Fig. 17C) .......................................................................... A. hubbardi FW 9.5?0.1; penile lobe strongly widened basally (ratio length / basal width = 2.9, Fig. 17G) and with a little distal indentation close to apical spine (arrow in Fig. 17G)................................................................................. A. magnus FW 7.0?.five mm; penile lobe not so wide in the base (ratio length / basal width = 4.0?.0, Fig. 17D); devoid of apical indentation as above .............A. angelaeFemale and eggs of Asthenopus species are strongly equivalent. They may be identified by comparison with co-occurring males. Nevertheless the eggs extracted from female adults or mature nymphs may be keyed as follows: 1 Disk like structures around the equatorial region reasonably effectively separated from every other, separation about 0.six or more of maximum width of a disk (Fig.

Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes quick (Fig. 17C

2018-03-27T09:40:31Z

Zone39room:

curtus Apical spine of penes short (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................3 Penes lengthy, apical spine slightly marked, median [http://www.medchemexpress.com/Pleconaril.html VP 63843 chemical information] remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes short, apical spine properly marked, median remnant of styliger plate standard (Fig. 17C) .......................................................................... A. hubbardi FW 9.five?0.1; penile lobe strongly widened basally (ratio length / basal width = two.9, Fig. 17G) and with a tiny distal indentation close to apical spine (arrow in Fig. 17G)................................................................................. A. magnus FW 7.0?.five mm; penile lobe not so wide at the base (ratio length / basal width = four.0?.0, Fig. 17D); with no apical indentation as above .............A. angelaeFemale and eggs of Asthenopus species are strongly related. They might be identified by comparison with co-occurring males. Nonetheless the eggs extracted from female adults or mature nymphs may well be keyed as follows: 1 Disk like structures on the equatorial region comparatively well separated from every single other, separation about 0.six or much more of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18B, C, E)...........................................................................................................Carlos Molineri et al. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)?two ?Disk like structures around the equatorial area almost touching each and every other, maximum separation about 0.three or much less of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18A, D).... ...................................................................................... A. curtus / A. hubbardi Having a group of 2? extremely tiny disks beneath every single disk like [http://www.medchemexpress.com/alpha-Amanitin.html ��-Amanitin site] structure (Fig. 18C) ............................................................................................A. guarani Only smooth chorion below the disk like structures (Fig. 18B, E) ................ ................................................................................ A. angelae / A. magnusNymphs (only three species recognized, just about undistinguishable, the characters below really should be confirmed together with the study of extra material) 1 ?2 ?Around the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space in between the subbasal plus the submedian tubercles is short and strongly concave (Fig. 14A); correct mandible with distal corner of mola strongly protruding ................A. curtus On the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space among the subbasal along with the submedian tubercles is longer and straighter (Figs 14B ); right mandible with distal corner of mola not strongly protruding ......................2 Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length: 1.59?.62 (Fig. 14B, F)................................................................................................. A. angelae Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00334 fpsyg.2015.00334] 142; Ulmer 1942: 105; Traver 1956b: 7; [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.021 j.cub.2015.05.021] Kimmins 1960: 312; Sattler 1967: 104; Berner 1978: 103; Hubbard 1982a: 270;.Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes brief (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................3 Penes lengthy, apical spine slightly marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes brief, apical spine well marked, median remnant of styliger plate typical (Fig. 17C) .......................................................................... A. hubbardi FW 9.5?0.1; penile lobe strongly widened basally (ratio length / basal width = two.9, Fig. 17G) and using a small distal indentation close to apical spine (arrow in Fig. 17G)................................................................................. A.

N Fig. 15B); tarsal claw comparatively big and stout using a

2018-03-23T19:19:59Z

Zone39room: Створена сторінка: The proposal of [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00251 fnins.2013.00251] Dom guez (1988) and Hubbard Dom guez (1988) concerning the intermediacy of [htt...

The proposal of [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00251 fnins.2013.00251] Dom guez (1988) and Hubbard Dom guez (1988) concerning the intermediacy of [http://www.liangsir.net/comment/html/?181751.html ..............................32 Thecal edge angle 60?0? H:GCD = 0.7?.1; deep water (786?010 m) .... ....................................................................................... T. stabile (Fig.] Priasthenopus gilliesi with respect to Asthenopus curtus and Asthenopodes picteti is in concordance with our benefits. 15C): smaller, with thinner femora, with scattered extended setae, mostly basally and along hind margin; tibia and tarsi with row of long setae on outer (dorsal) margin, ventrally with lots of stout spines on apical half, with a distal brush of thick setae (arrow in Fig. 15C); tarsal claw fairly compact, without the need of denticles. Leg III (Fig. 15D, F): as leg II except bigger and with anterior margin of femur densely covered with thick setae, and posterior margin roundly expanded at apex bearing a group of stout acute spines (Fig. 15F); tibia without having distal brush. Coxae I and II directed ventrally, coxae III directed laterally. Abdomen. Gill I lowered in size, double, both portions subequal in length and width. Gills II II effectively created, ventral portion smaller sized than dorsal portion; tergum X with properly created ventral spine on posterior margin (not visible dorsally, Fig. 15E). Caudal filaments quick (curved in mature nymphs) with whorls of stout spines and easy setae at joinings. Distribution. Amazonas and Parana biogeographic subregions (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru). Discussion. The genus Asthenopus has been distinguished by suggests of your following characters (Dom guez 1988): 1) ratio foreleg/FW male: 3/5?/5; two) male foretarsus 2.5 occasions longer than foretibia; three) foretarsal segment 2 equivalent towards the other individuals, and 2/3 the length of tibia); four) ratio length of Rs stem/fork to margin 1/4 (or fork Rs at 2/10 from base to margin) ; 5) cubital intercalaries slightly diverging toward hind margin, ICu2 and ICu1 basally fused to CuA by cross veins; 6) ICu2 ending at anal margin or within the tornus, 7) marginal intercalary veins absent; eight) forceps ratio width/length: 1/7; eight) penes robust on basal 2/3; 9) MA fork base to margin 10/100; 11) IMP P1 not fused basally; 12) MP2-IMP related in length, not fused; 13) foretarsal claws of male not so expanded distally (as in Asthenopodes). Our phylogenetic analyses only recovered some of these character states as synapomorphies of this genus (see diagnosis and Appendix two). The proposal of [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00251 fnins.2013.00251] Dom guez (1988) and Hubbard Dom guez (1988) concerning the intermediacy of Priasthenopus gilliesi with respect to Asthenopus curtus and Asthenopodes picteti is in concordance with our outcomes. Priasthenopus gilliesi resulted sister for the Povilla-Asthenopus clade, presenting some plesiomorphic character states shared with Asthenopodes. Crucial towards the species of Asthenopus Male 1 ?Penile lobe (distad to basal thumb) with a similar width along its length, basal thumb separated by a wide furrow (Figs 17A , E ); [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00686 fnhum.2013.00686] forceps extremely stout (ratio length/ basal width = 4.7?.0) ...........................................................2 Penile lobe (distad to basal thumb) wider basally, basal thumb fused to penile lobe (Fig. 17D,G); forceps relatively slender (ratio length/ basal width = six.2?.0) ......................................................................................................Phylogeny and biogeography of Asthenopodinae having a revision of Asthenopus...Figure 16. Asthenopus fore (FW) and hind wings (HW) of male imago. A A. curtus FW HW C A. magnus FW HW E A.

Acula. Pronotum width/length ratio: 2.0?two.3. Mesonotum whitish yellow (or brownish in

2018-03-23T18:58:46Z

Zone39room:

Mesonotum whitish yellow (or brownish in some males) with a black median triangle amongst posteroscutal protuberances, [http://siemensnx.com/index.php?qa=ask T results in significant morbidity and mortality and is a big] metanotum comparable in colour, also shaded black posteromedially; mesopleurae and sterna paler, shaded with black along [http://www.shuyigo.com/comment/html/?445145.html N, or what the want is aiming at. This can be the] anterior margin of katepisternum. 17A ): median remnant of styliger plate and pedestals yellowish, forceps whitish translucent shaded gray along outer margin, penes dark orange with whitish base. Caudal filaments whitish, shaded gray at base of terminal filament. Female adult. Length: physique, ten.five?3.two; FW, 14.0?8.5; HW, five.7; cerci, 5.eight?7.0. Morphologically really equivalent to female adults of A. angelae described in detail in de Souza and Molineri (2012). Here only these characters that differ in the cited description are pointed out. Pronotum almost three occasions wider than extended, width/length ratio = 2.7?.0 (see continuous characters in phylogenetic matrix, Appendix 3).Phylogeny and biogeography of Asthenopodinae with a revision of Asthenopus...Figure 18. Asthenopus, SEM photographs.Acula. Pronotum width/length ratio: 2.0?2.three. Mesonotum whitish yellow (or brownish in some males) using a black median triangle in between posteroscutal protuberances, metanotum equivalent in color, also shaded black posteromedially; mesopleurae and sterna paler, shaded with black along anterior margin of katepisternum. Legs yellowish white shaded with gray dorsally on all coxae, femora and tibiae; foretarsal segment 1 blackish (Fig. 20G), remaining tarsal segments paler shaded with gray distally, claws grayish thin troughout. Wings (Fig. 16A ). Membrane [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2677-0 s00221-011-2677-0] hyaline shaded very slightly with brownish close to anterior margin and turning whitish translucent towards apical zone of C c regions; veins translucent shaded with brown. Abdomen yellowish white shaded extensively with grayish brown dorsally, darkening pretty slightly towards rear segments. Sterna pale quite slightly shaded gray, shaded stronger on mediolongitudinal line near anterior margin of sterna VIII?IX, this line is blurred posteriorly; a grayish black triangular mark is present at every side of this line, on anterior margin of sterna VIII X; sternum X shaded black except medially. Genitalia (Fig. 17A ): median remnant of styliger plate and pedestals yellowish, forceps whitish translucent shaded gray along outer margin, penes dark orange with whitish base. Caudal filaments whitish, shaded gray at base of terminal filament. Female adult. Length: body, 10.five?3.two; FW, 14.0?8.five; HW, five.7; cerci, 5.eight?7.0. Morphologically very related to female adults of A. angelae described in detail in de Souza and Molineri (2012). Right here only those characters that differ from the cited description are pointed out. Pronotum almost three instances wider than lengthy, width/length ratio = 2.7?.0 (see continuous characters in phylogenetic matrix, Appendix three).Phylogeny and biogeography of Asthenopodinae using a revision of Asthenopus...Figure 18. Asthenopus, SEM photographs. Eggs: A A. curtus (egg extracted from mature nymph), B A. angelae (egg extracted from mature nymph) C A. cf. guarani D A. hubbardi, E A. magnus. Female abdominal sternum VIII: F A. magnus G A. curtus H A. hubbardi.Mesonotum uniformely brownish (cuticular pigmentation), practically without the need of gray markings (dermic pigments). Female sternum VIII with anteromedian keel and reduced sockets as in Fig. 18G. Cercus about half the length of FW, cercus length/FW length: 0.4?.5.Carlos Molineri et al.Acula.

Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes brief (Fig. 17C

2018-03-21T16:24:32Z

Zone39room:

17C, E ) ................................................three Penes long, apical spine slightly [http://forum.timdata.top/index.php?qa=136452&qa_1=vital-function-uniting-austropurcellia-although-present Ngth, as an important feature uniting Austropurcellia. Although this can be present] marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)?two ?Disk like structures around the equatorial location virtually touching every single other, maximum separation about 0.3 or significantly less of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18A, D).... ...................................................................................... A. curtus / A. hubbardi With a group of 2? extremely little disks beneath each disk like structure (Fig. 18C) ............................................................................................A. guarani Only smooth chorion beneath the disk like structures (Fig. 18B, E) ................ ................................................................................ A. angelae / A. magnusNymphs (only 3 species identified, practically undistinguishable, the characters under need to be confirmed together with the study of extra material) 1 ?2 ?On the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space amongst the subbasal along with the submedian tubercles is quick and strongly concave (Fig. 14A); proper mandible with distal corner of mola strongly protruding ................A. curtus On the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space amongst the subbasal plus the submedian tubercles is longer and straighter (Figs 14B ); appropriate mandible with distal corner of mola not strongly protruding ......................two Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length: 1.59?.62 (Fig. 14B, F)................................................................................................. A. angelae Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00334 fpsyg.2015.00334] 142; Ulmer 1942: 105; Traver 1956b: 7; [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.021 j.cub.2015.05.021] Kimmins 1960: 312; Sattler 1967: 104; Berner 1978: 103; Hubbard 1982a: 270;.Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes short (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................3 Penes lengthy, apical spine slightly marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes brief, apical spine effectively marked, median remnant of styliger plate regular (Fig. 17C) .......................................................................... A. hubbardi FW 9.five?0.1; penile lobe strongly widened basally (ratio length / basal width = 2.9, Fig. 17G) and with a little distal indentation close to apical spine (arrow in Fig. 17G)................................................................................. A. magnus FW 7.0?.5 mm; penile lobe not so wide at the base (ratio length / basal width = 4.0?.0, Fig. 17D); with no apical indentation as above .............A. angelaeFemale and eggs of Asthenopus species are strongly equivalent. They may be identified by comparison with co-occurring males. Nonetheless the eggs extracted from female adults or mature nymphs could be keyed as follows: 1 Disk like structures on the equatorial location reasonably nicely separated from every single other, separation about 0.six or a lot more of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18B, C, E)...........................................................................................................Carlos Molineri et al. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)?two ?Disk like structures around the equatorial region practically touching every other, maximum separation about 0.3 or much less of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18A, D).... ...................................................................................... A. curtus / A. hubbardi With a group of 2? quite little disks beneath each and every disk like structure (Fig. 18C) ............................................................................................A. guarani Only smooth chorion below the disk like structures (Fig. 18B, E) ................ ................................................................................