Перегляд вихідного коду сторінки Another Hidden Spy tools For MK-1775

A trial consisted of the following sequence of events: a fixation point (+) was presented for 500 ms in the center of the screen, then right after the fixation cross disappeared a priming word was presented for 50, 150, 200, or 400 ms (different SOAs). Probes were presented at the center of the computer screen right after the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSCD4 CYTH4] offset of the priming and remained on the screen for maximum 3000 ms. Participants were asked to judge as quickly and as accurately as possible whether or not the probe in each trial was a real word, and to press the corresponding button on a response box. The inter-trial interval was 500 ms (blank screen) and then the next trial started. If the participant failed to respond in 3000 ms, the trial was terminated and the trial was recorded as an error. Participants received 10 practice trials, for which feedback was provided. No feedback was provided [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/KU-55933.html KU-55933 order] during the experiment. Results Participants�� mean latencies (based on untrimmed correct responses) and error rates are summarized in Table ?Table33. Table 3 Means of latencies (ms) and error rates (%) in Experiment 1 (based on evaluative congruency). Results of the analyses on latency showed a significant difference between congruent and incongruent priming, F(1,96) = 24.60, MSE = 250299, p  SOAs (50, 150 ms), rather than by longer ones (200, 400 ms). However, differences between 50 and 150 ms priming, and between 200 and 400 ms priming, were not found. The interaction between priming type and congruency did not reach significance, F [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/MK-1775.html MK-1775 clinical trial] priming type and SOAs, and the three-way interaction, were missing, Fs  0.10, and priming types, F(1,96)