Перегляд вихідного коду сторінки Handful Of Forecasts On The Unforeseeable Future For MS-275

1 weeks, SD = 1.3, range = 6.7 weeks). Infants in the study went home on average 21.3 days after starting oral feedings (SD = 10.2 days, range = 47 days; PMA = 36.1 weeks, SD = 1.4, range = 6.1 weeks). [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quinapyramine Quinapyramine] As seen in Table 3, there were differences in the intervention groups on days to achieve full oral feeding once oral feedings were started (F = 6.75, p = 0.004). Using the Tukey method for comparison of groups, groups 1 and 2 (32-week start groups) achieved full oral feeding at a mean of 18 days, which was significantly different from group 4 (34-week start, maximum experience) whose time to full oral feeding was 9 days from the start of oral feedings (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, resp.). Groups 1 and 2 did not differ significantly from group 3, whose mean time to full oral feeding was 14 days, and [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/MS-275.html MS-275 cell line] group 3 did not differ significantly from group 4. The groups also differed significantly on days to discharge from the start of oral feeding (F = 6.44, p = 0.001). Using the Tukey method for comparison of groups, groups 1 and 2 were discharged to home, at a mean of 26 and 25 days, respectively, following the start of oral feedings, which was significantly longer than infants in group 4 whose time to discharge was 15 days from the start of oral feeding (p = 0.003 and p = 0.009, resp.). Group 1 was also significantly different from group 3, whose mean time to discharge was 19 days (p = 0.03). Group 2 did not differ significantly from group 3 and group 3 did not differ significantly from group 4. As Table 3 also shows, group 3 differed significantly from groups 1 and 2 in PMA at full oral feeding. There were no other significant differences in PMA at full oral feedings or discharge. Table 3 PMA and time in days to full oral feeding and discharge from first oral feeding. On average, all infants gained about 205 grams per week. Weight gain did not vary by group assignment although it did differ by morbidity (p = 0.05). Tukey's HSD indicated that infants with a NMI classification of 4 gained weight more slowly than those with a NMI of 3 (Table 4). There were no other differences. Table 4 Weight gain during oral feedings. We conducted additional analyses to determine if other variables of potential [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/GDC-0449.html check details] interest affected the outcomes. We were particularly interested in whether outcomes differed by morbidity, both within groups and overall. When run independent of group assignment, time to full oral feeding and time to discharge from the start of oral feeding both differed significantly by morbidity. Infants at NMI 5 took significantly longer to achieve full oral feeding from the start of oral feeding than infants with a NMI of 1 or 2 (F = 4.15, p = 0.004). Infants at NMIs 4 and 5 also took significantly longer to be discharged to home following the start of full oral feedings than infants at NMIs 1 and 2 (F = 8.32, p