Перегляд вихідного коду сторінки New Viewpoint Over I-BET-762 Just Released

Table 2 The results of TET with comparison between patients with and without CAS Baseline normal ECG without ST segment abnormality was observed in 190 patients (94.1%) and left ventricular hypertrophy with ST segment change or right bundle branch block were present in 7 and 5 patients respectively. There was no difference in percent of normal or abnormal baseline ECG findings between patient with CAS or not (Table 2). No patient had left bundle branch block (LBBB) and ST segment elevation at baseline. Ischemic ST change with typical pattern of ischemic ST depression developed more frequently in patients with CAS (53.7% vs. 26.4%, p [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diglyceride diglyceride] was increased to 70.7% with 69.3% specificity. The mean of DTS was also significantly lower in patients with CAS than that of patients without CAS (-0.66 �� 7.3 vs. 5.27 [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/i-bet-762.html I-BET-762 price] �� 5.1, p [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/iox1.html selleck compound] In 183 patients with normal regional wall motion at baseline, new regional wall motion abnormality developed in 36 patients. Therefore inducible ischemia was detected in 46 patients (22.8%) in patients who complete dobutamine stress test. The overall calculated test sensitivity was 70.4% and specificity was 94.6%. Test sensitivity of DSE was increased according to the number of stenotic epicardial coronary artery (51.9% for 1-vessel, 77.8% for 2-vessels, and 94.4% for 3-vessel CAS, p = 008). The sensitivity and specificity for localization of coronary stenosis by DSE was 55.9% and 91.3%, respectively. Table 3 The results of DSE with comparison between patients with and without CAS The worsening of regional wall motion was observed in 8 patients of who had no significant coronary stenosis. These deteriorations of wall motion were localized to posterior (n = 4) and inferior wall (n = 3).