Перегляд вихідного коду сторінки Obtaining The Amazing Bcl-2 inhibitor Bargain

Figure ?Figure55). Peak velocity To assess whether altering the hand velocity benefits participants' performance or not, peak velocity was calculated from each individual intercepting movement. A Two-Way repeated measures ANOVA (5 Sounds �� 2 S/U) revealed no significant main effect for Sound types [F(4, 36) = 0.342, p = 0.847, ��2 = 0.037] or the S/U condition [F(1, 9) = 0.928, p = 0.361, ��2 = 0.093]. There was a significant interaction between the sound and successful/unsuccessful factors [F(4, 36) = 5.5, p = 0.001, ��2 = 0.379]. Importantly, post-hoc analysis revealed that successful trials for decelerating sounds were achieved by larger peak velocity compared to the unsuccessful ones (p = 0.006), while moving with lower peak velocity to intercept the medium sound [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isoxsuprine Isoxsuprine] led to higher rate of successful trials compared to unsuccessful ones (p  for participants to accomplish the task (cf. Figure ?Figure66). Figure 6 Averaged peak velocities for successful and unsuccessful trials across all 10 participants for all the sounds (ACC, Accelerating; DEC, Decelerating; Vf, Fast; Vm, [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/frax597.html Selleckchem FRAX597] Medium; and Vs, Slow). Error bars denote standard errors. Significant comparisons between ... Time to peak velocity A Two-Way repeated measures ANOVA (5 Sounds �� 2 S/U) revealed a significant main effect for Sounds types [F(4, 36) = 15.872, p [http://www.selleckchem.com/Bcl-2.html Bcl-2 inhibition] and slow sounds (p = 0.017). Moreover, the time to reach the peak velocity was significantly shorter for fast compared to decelerating (DEC), slow (Vs) and medium (Vm) speed sounds (p = 0.017, 0.018, and 0.03, respectively). This implies that the time to reach the hand peak velocity changed as a function of the sound's velocity. Importantly, no significant effect was found for the successful/unsuccessful factor [F(1, 9) = 0.565, p = 0.471, ��2 = 0.059]. Moreover, there was a significant interaction between the sound and successful/unsuccessful factors [F(4, 36) = 16.790, p