Перегляд вихідного коду сторінки Ones Advantage Of TAE684

Due to the very low prevalence of other types of stones and inability [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/NVP-TAE684.html TAE684 chemical structure] to perform the chi-square test to a group of other stones are grouped stones which, by virtue were cystine, xanthine stones and uric acid stones. The incidence of cystine calculi was 4 (0.9%), frequency of xanthine stones 3 (0.7%) and uric acid 8 (1.9%). In the group of female respondents 74 (40.88%) had calculus size up to 10 mm, while in the group of male patients stone size up to 10 mm had 107 (59.12%). In the group of female respondents 96 of them (43.05%) had a size of stone exceeding 10 mm, while in the group of male patients stone size over 10 mm had 127 (56.95%). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of stones with sizes up to 10 and over 10 mm by gender (��2 = 0.192, p = [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FMO5 FMO5] 0.661) Number of stones localized in the upper pole of the kidney in women was 43 (48.86%), and among men was slightly lower and amounted to 45 (51.13%). Number localized in the lower pole of the kidney in women was 22 (61.11%), and among men was slightly lower and amounted to 14 (38.88%). Number of stones localized medially among women was 38 (45.78%), and among men was slightly lower and amounted to 45 (54.21%). Number of localized in the renal pyelon in females was 27 (40.39%), and among men was slightly lower and amounted to 40 (59.70%). There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of localization of stones by gender. The incidence of urolithiasis at the site of physiological narrowing of the ureter in female subjects was 22 (27.5%) and 58 in males (72.5%). The incidence of urolithiasis at the site of the physiological enlargement of the ureter in female subjects was 8 (50%), and the same among men 8 (50%). There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of localization of calculi to physiological narrowing and widening of the ureter in relation to gender differences (p = 0.086). The most common size of the calculi in the sample was 15 mm. This size had 21.04% of respondents. The second most [http://www.selleckchem.com/erk.html ERK inhibitor ic50] common size of the calculi in the sample was 9 mm, which had 14.6% of respondents, followed by the size of 20 mm, which had 14.38% of the respondents. The least frequent size calculi were 17 mm, which was only 0.25% of the respondents. Size of the calculi in women was 12 (8-15 mm), while in men it was 12 (8-15 mm). There was no statistically significant difference in the size of calculi between males and females (p = 0.557). There was a significant mild positive correlation between age and size of the stone in the total sample (rho = 0.240, p