Перегляд вихідного коду сторінки Secret Tips For GS-1101

Finally, the incidence of helmet use was also reported for both activities. Descriptive analyses based on age, gender, mechanisms of injury, location, helmet use, body part, nature and severity of injury were [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/AG-014699.html learn more] profiled according to longboarding and skateboarding. Means with confidence intervals (95%) were calculated for age and compared using t-test. Pearson's Chi square statistics were used to compare the categorical data between the two activities. Calculations and analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0, and results were deemed significant at ��?=?0.05 (2-tailed). The first table (refer to Table 1) shows the age, gender and location (i.e., where the injury happened) of the 4485 selected cases, 287 of which were due to longboarding and 4198 to skateboarding. The mean age of the injured longboarders and skateboarders was 14.3 years (CI, 95%; 12.6�C16.1) and 12.7 years (CI, 95%; 10.1�C15.4), respectively. [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/CAL-101.html www.selleckchem.com/products/CAL-101.html] One fifth of the injured skateboarders were under the age of 11 while all the injuries from longboarding involved children 11 years and older. The proportion of girls injured while longboarding in relation to boys was higher than it was for skateboarders, at 18.8% vs. 10.7% (p?[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSCD4 CYTH4] time of the injury; the prevalence of helmet use among these subjects was similar for longboarders (29.8%) and skateboarders (33.4%), (see Table 2). Patients who reported wearing a helmet had significantly lower proportion of severe intracranial injuries (concussion, visible injury to the brain, skull fracture or spine injury) than those who did not wear a helmet (1.9% vs. 5.0%, p?