Перегляд вихідного коду сторінки The Amazing Hot Ro3280 Methods Unearthed By My Mate

32 %, MPC 24?h �� SE = 96 �� 0.37 %, p  effect (Table ?(Table5)5) indicating that the additional workload from adding a secondary task to the choice reaction time task did [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/erastin.html selleck kinase inhibitor] not change across testing sessions. The ICC scores for mean RTs and the RT switch cost at 24-h interval were in the Good to Very Good range (Mean RT: 0.781 and RT switch cost: 0.817; Table ?Table5).5). The test-retest reliability score for the WM load RT effect (difference in reaction time performance between the dual tasks and CRT) 24-h after baseline was Good (0.735), but the dual task interference effect (difference in accuracy between dual task CRT and CRT) was below the Good range (0.496). Flanker The mixed factor ANOVA on mean reaction time including the task variable of Flanker Congruency (congruent, incongruent) revealed that RTs were faster for congruent trials than incongruent trials [congruent = 452.8 �� 5.6 ms, incongruent = 470.2 �� 5.5 ms; F(1, 94) = 105.11, MSE = 256.05, p  p = 0.014, Table ?Table3].3]. [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/3-deazaneplanocin-a-dznep.html 3-deazaneplanocin A solubility dmso] A significant practice effect for mean RT was found; participants were faster at 24-h than at baseline (MRT 24?h �� SE = 458.74 �� 6.01 ms, MRT baseline �� SE = 471.90 �� 5.55 ms, p [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLK1 Ro3280] across testing sessions (Table ?(Table55). The test-retest reliability score of mean RTs at the 24-h session was Very Good (0.871). However, the test-retest reliability scores for the RT interference effect (i.e., incongruent RT minus congruent RT) was less than Good (0.301, Table ?Table55). Item working memory Due to changes in programming, the final version of the item working memory task was not completed by all participants (n = 65; 42 female). The mixed factor ANOVA on mean reaction time including the task variables of Set Size (2, 4, 6) and Target (present, absent) revealed the anticipated effect of Set Size, such that RTs were significantly slowed for each additional two-item increase in working memory set size [F(2, 126) = 220.24, MSE = 11292.38, p