Перегляд вихідного коду сторінки The CAL-101-Game

Both the patients who were hospitalised for operation and those treated on demand in the emergency room were included. There are no other paediatric trauma units in our hospital district and all paediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures have been treated in the same unit during the study period. The cohort was inclusive. To get valid incidence rate in relation to the population in risk, non-residents were excluded. [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/CAL-101.html CAL-101 clinical trial] A comprehensive review on injuries, hospitalisation and the details of treatment and following was entered in the computerised database. All the radiographs were re-analysed twice by a radiologist and a clinician. The final include of the cases was made according to the review of the primary radiographs. The operative summaries were reviewed as well as clinical notes. We determined >15�� of malalignment, >30�� of malrotation and >100% of displacement as the indicators of unacceptable position postoperatively or during the conservative treatment. However, despite [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SKAP1 SKAP1] the numbers, all the patients who underwent an unplanned operation due to loss of position were classified as unacceptable. The surgical procedures were classified as a closed treatment (closed reduction and application of a cast under general anaesthesia) and an invasive treatment (closed or open reduction and internal fixation). The age-matching population-in-the-risk in the district of our institute during the study was achieved by the comprehensive national database by Official Statistics of Finland. It varied between 84.562 and 86.385. The annual incidences per 100?000 age-related persons are given as well as other descriptive frequencies. Independent t-test was used to test differences between group means, ��2 statistic was used to investigate whether distributions of the gategorical variables differed from one another, the differences between two proportions were tested by the binomial SND test and a change in time was tested by the linear trend test. [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/AZD0530.html check details] The Poisson distribution-based ��2 test was used to test the difference in the annual incidence densities between the first and the last follow-up year. The amount of annual diaphyseal fracture increase was estimated by exponential regression analysis. A statistical significance was preset at the P-value?