<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="uk">
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=What%27s_Happening_With_The_Endonuclease</id>
		<title>What's Happening With The Endonuclease - Історія редагувань</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=What%27s_Happening_With_The_Endonuclease"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=What%27s_Happening_With_The_Endonuclease&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-04T07:21:55Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Історія редагувань цієї сторінки в вікі</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=What%27s_Happening_With_The_Endonuclease&amp;diff=197411&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Bronzeedge83: Створена сторінка: Differences were considered statistically significant at P?[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endonuclease Endonuclease] the CM of mono-cultured HT29 was mixed with...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=What%27s_Happening_With_The_Endonuclease&amp;diff=197411&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2017-07-03T06:51:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Створена сторінка: Differences were considered statistically significant at P?[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endonuclease Endonuclease] the CM of mono-cultured HT29 was mixed with...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Нова сторінка&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Differences were considered statistically significant at P?[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endonuclease Endonuclease] the CM of mono-cultured HT29 was mixed with the co-cultured CM, and it was designated as sample 2. Prior to LC�CMS/MS analysis, both two sets of mixed CM samples were concentrated by ultrafiltration and separated by SDS-PAGE followed by protein in-gel digestion and MS identification. The SILAC ratio was defined [http://www.selleckchem.com/EGFR(HER).html find protocol] as the intensity ratio of 13C6-Lys-labeling peptides versus the unlabeling ones. It was averaged when several peptides were used to quantify a protein. The SILAC ratio1 of sample 1 was shown as the relative expression level of a secreted protein between 13C6-Lys-labeling mono-cultured NCM460 versus co-cultured cells (NCM460/co-culture). Similarly, SILAC ratio2, from sample 2, was represented [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/ABT-263.html http://www.selleckchem.com/products/ABT-263.html] as protein levels in condition of 13C6-Lys-labeling mono-cultured HT29 versus co-cultured cells (HT29/co-culture). Because the same number of NCM460 and HT29 cells was respectively seeded both in each mono-culture model and in either the top or bottom chamber of the co-culture, cell amounts in the co-culture model were double times compared with each mono-culture. Theoretically, the concentrations of all secreted proteins in co-culture system were almost equal to the sum of secreted proteins from two groups of mono-cultured cells. Therefore, for a protein, its total SILAC ratio, namely the sum of SILAC ratio1 plus SILAC ratio2 (SILAC ratio 1?+?SILAC ratio2) was near 1 as no expression change happened after co-cultured. If the sum of SILAC ratio1 plus SILAC ratio2 was over than 1, which indicated that the protein expression was down-regulated after co-culture. On the contrary, as the sum of SILAC ratio1 plus SILAC ratio2 was less than 1, it meant an up-regulation of a protein after co-cultured, and the increased fold was calculated by the reciprocal of the sum (1?/?(SILAC ratio 1?+?SILAC ratio 2)). Of course, the change ratio of a protein, also the differential secretion level of a protein after co-cultures was estimated by calculating the value of SILAC ratio1 plus SILAC ratio2 (SILAC ratio 1?+?SILAC ratio 2) as above, which should be normalized with a correction factor based on the SILAC quantification. In our system, 5?��?106 mono-cultured NCM460 cells could release 100.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bronzeedge83</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>