Відмінності між версіями «Cb-839 Patent»
м |
м |
||
| (не показана одна проміжна версія ще одного учасника) | |||
| Рядок 1: | Рядок 1: | ||
| − | + | He ``counter-culture'', and have entrenched associations with cannabis use and cultivation, particularly employing outdoor techniques. Only seizures containing at the very least two g of green plant material (GPM) were eligible for analysis; those containing tobacco have been rejected. In the 200 seizures obtained in sealed exhibit bags, 195 (97.five ) contained one piece of GPM, 4 (two ) contained two pieces of GPM (2 ) and 1 (0.five ) contained 3 pieces of GPM, [https://www.medchemexpress.com/W-54011.html purchase W-54011 customsynthesis] resulting inside a total of n = 206 samples for analysis. These are referred to as ``Cannabis Cautioning'' samples. GPM obtained in the course of NSW police cannabis crop eradication operations among February and May perhaps, 2012. Samples were collected from thirteen unique outside soil-grown cannabis crops (size from a dozen to 500 plants) raided through police operations against commercial growing interests on the rural mid-northern NSW coast, a prominent cannabis cultivation location. The thirteen indoor soil-grown crops (size of one hundred to 300 plants) were obtained throughout police operations in urban Sydney. Together these indoor and outside bigger scale seizures are referred to as ``Known Provenance'' samples.Sample StorageStorage and evaluation of all samples was undertaken in a safe laboratory inside the Discipline of Pharmacology, University of Sydney. On receipt, samples had been photographed and weighed and stored at [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16985061 16985061 ] 220uC inside a locked freezer.Sample PreparationAs Cannabis Cautioning samples had been not uniform in type and look, plant material employed for analysis was selected in the female buds of cannabis samples to minimise variation because of sampling bias. The extraction procedure employed was depending on a validated protocol [30]. Samples had been then dried for 24 h inside a 35uC forced ventilation oven. Dried samples have been crumbed, ground and mixed. 200 mg of this fine powder were weighed in a glass vial and extracted with ten mL of a mixture of methanol/ chloroform (v/v: 9/1) by sonication for 30 min. The extract was filtered and appropriately diluted in an amber vial. A 100 mL aliquot in the dilution was evaporated beneath a nitrogen stream and redissolved in 100 mL of a mixture of water/acetonitrile (v/v: 5/5) containing diazepam (50 mg/L) as an internal normal. Two separate extractions have been performed on every single sample, and these had been separately assayed and compared.Supplies and Strategies Sample AcquisitionTwo separate groups of cannabis seizures were analysed, comprising: (i) cannabis seizures confiscated by NSW Police amongst October 9, 2010 and October 19, 2011, as part of the Cannabis Cautioning Scheme. Under this scheme, adults detected by police employing or in possession of not more than 15 g of dried cannabis and/or gear for utilizing the cannabis could acquire a formal police caution instead of face criminal charges and court proceedings. As these seizures will not be necessary for evidentiary purposes but destroyed by police, permission was received from NSW Police to analyse themChromatographic AnalysisAnalysis of cannabinoid content material was undertaken working with high efficiency liquid chromatography diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) using the process of De Backer et al. [30] with slight modification. The modified process was validated (for selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision and recovery) according to the presently accepted USA Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for bioanalytical method validation [31]. | |
Поточна версія на 09:59, 21 серпня 2017
He ``counter-culture, and have entrenched associations with cannabis use and cultivation, particularly employing outdoor techniques. Only seizures containing at the very least two g of green plant material (GPM) were eligible for analysis; those containing tobacco have been rejected. In the 200 seizures obtained in sealed exhibit bags, 195 (97.five ) contained one piece of GPM, 4 (two ) contained two pieces of GPM (2 ) and 1 (0.five ) contained 3 pieces of GPM, purchase W-54011 customsynthesis resulting inside a total of n = 206 samples for analysis. These are referred to as ``Cannabis Cautioning samples. GPM obtained in the course of NSW police cannabis crop eradication operations among February and May perhaps, 2012. Samples were collected from thirteen unique outside soil-grown cannabis crops (size from a dozen to 500 plants) raided through police operations against commercial growing interests on the rural mid-northern NSW coast, a prominent cannabis cultivation location. The thirteen indoor soil-grown crops (size of one hundred to 300 plants) were obtained throughout police operations in urban Sydney. Together these indoor and outside bigger scale seizures are referred to as ``Known Provenance samples.Sample StorageStorage and evaluation of all samples was undertaken in a safe laboratory inside the Discipline of Pharmacology, University of Sydney. On receipt, samples had been photographed and weighed and stored at 16985061 220uC inside a locked freezer.Sample PreparationAs Cannabis Cautioning samples had been not uniform in type and look, plant material employed for analysis was selected in the female buds of cannabis samples to minimise variation because of sampling bias. The extraction procedure employed was depending on a validated protocol [30]. Samples had been then dried for 24 h inside a 35uC forced ventilation oven. Dried samples have been crumbed, ground and mixed. 200 mg of this fine powder were weighed in a glass vial and extracted with ten mL of a mixture of methanol/ chloroform (v/v: 9/1) by sonication for 30 min. The extract was filtered and appropriately diluted in an amber vial. A 100 mL aliquot in the dilution was evaporated beneath a nitrogen stream and redissolved in 100 mL of a mixture of water/acetonitrile (v/v: 5/5) containing diazepam (50 mg/L) as an internal normal. Two separate extractions have been performed on every single sample, and these had been separately assayed and compared.Supplies and Strategies Sample AcquisitionTwo separate groups of cannabis seizures were analysed, comprising: (i) cannabis seizures confiscated by NSW Police amongst October 9, 2010 and October 19, 2011, as part of the Cannabis Cautioning Scheme. Under this scheme, adults detected by police employing or in possession of not more than 15 g of dried cannabis and/or gear for utilizing the cannabis could acquire a formal police caution instead of face criminal charges and court proceedings. As these seizures will not be necessary for evidentiary purposes but destroyed by police, permission was received from NSW Police to analyse themChromatographic AnalysisAnalysis of cannabinoid content material was undertaken working with high efficiency liquid chromatography diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) using the process of De Backer et al. [30] with slight modification. The modified process was validated (for selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision and recovery) according to the presently accepted USA Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for bioanalytical method validation [31].
