Відмінності між версіями «And punishment for low- to no-risk activities, severity of sentences, vague»
м |
м |
||
Рядок 1: | Рядок 1: | ||
− | Unfortunately, the nature | + | Since these laws were adopted, scientific understanding of HIV and its transmission has sophisticated significantly: scientists have established the preventive influence of antiretroviral therapy, and they can now estimate the threat of HIV transmission associated with precise activities more accurately5---8 and recognize viral strains that diverse persons carry.9 [http://lifelearninginstitute.net/members/sheet04bacon/activity/623769/ Which culminates in the {child|kid|youngster] [http://darkyblog.joorjoor.com/members/single66power/activity/184417/ And punishment for low- to no-risk activities, severity of sentences, vague] HIV-specific criminal laws have not kept pace with these scientific advances.BACKGROUNDCharacteristics of HIV-specific laws have already been described elsewhere.2---4 Present laws involve each crimes in which HIV status is the only issue distinguishing an act from legal behavior (e.g., consensual sex) and those for which obtaining HIV increases the severity of an current crime and imposes greater punishment (e.g., prostitution, sexual assault). Providers also cited the negative influence of criminalization on their efforts to establish counseling relationships with PLHIV that fostered openness about sexual activities and disclosure challenges.16 Similar subtle.And punishment for low- to no-risk activities, severity of sentences, vague language along with the possibility of discriminatory enforcement, and broad prosecutorial discretion. Unfortunately, the nature on the samples, which had been derived from incomplete records, limited conclusions about implementation or enforcement with the laws. Since these laws have been adopted, scientific understanding of HIV and its transmission has sophisticated considerably: scientists have established the preventive effect of antiretroviral therapy, and they can now estimate the threat of HIV transmission related with particular activities additional accurately5---8 and identify viral strains that diverse folks carry.9 HIV-specific criminal laws have not kept pace with these scientific advances.BACKGROUNDCharacteristics of HIV-specific laws happen to be described elsewhere.2---4 Existing laws consist of each crimes in which HIV status may be the only element distinguishing an act from legal behavior (e.g., consensual sex) and those for which obtaining HIV increases the severity of an existing crime and imposes higher punishment (e.g., prostitution, sexual assault). Although no complete record of HIVrelated criminal circumstances exists, two research have analyzed US prosecutions more than time. Researchers have identified many concerns with HIVspecific statutes and their enforcement.since fairly couple of persons are incarcerated for HIV exposure2,ten and new infections can occur in prison.11 There is also tiny proof to recommend that criminalizing HIV exposure modifications social norms: studies have discovered that persons living in states with and with out HIV-specific laws10,12 and persons that are aware and unaware of their state's HIV-specific law13 usually do not differ on perceived duty for preventing HIV transmission.10 Proof that the criminal law produces a deterrent effect-- like prompting persons with HIV to disclose much more typically or have safer sex with fewer partners--has been mixed. Awareness of a state's HIV-specific law was connected with sooner (but not much more frequent) seropositive status disclosure in 1 study,14 and worry of prosecution for nondisclosure was linked with seropositive status disclosure in yet another.15 Other research have located no evidence of deterrence,ten,12 and none have discovered effects of enough magnitude to decrease HIV prevalence at a population level.Doable Negative Influence on Public Well being EffortsLaws that criminalize HIV exposure may possibly really undermine public overall health efforts by, as an example, delivering a disincentive for persons at threat to become tested (lest men and women turn out to be conscious of their infection and must disclose it to sex partners) or by reinforcing discrimination against persons living with HIV (PLHIV) and exacerbating HIV-related stigma. |
Версія за 16:04, 14 грудня 2017
Since these laws were adopted, scientific understanding of HIV and its transmission has sophisticated significantly: scientists have established the preventive influence of antiretroviral therapy, and they can now estimate the threat of HIV transmission associated with precise activities more accurately5---8 and recognize viral strains that diverse persons carry.9 Which culminates in the {child|kid|youngster And punishment for low- to no-risk activities, severity of sentences, vague HIV-specific criminal laws have not kept pace with these scientific advances.BACKGROUNDCharacteristics of HIV-specific laws have already been described elsewhere.2---4 Present laws involve each crimes in which HIV status is the only issue distinguishing an act from legal behavior (e.g., consensual sex) and those for which obtaining HIV increases the severity of an current crime and imposes greater punishment (e.g., prostitution, sexual assault). Providers also cited the negative influence of criminalization on their efforts to establish counseling relationships with PLHIV that fostered openness about sexual activities and disclosure challenges.16 Similar subtle.And punishment for low- to no-risk activities, severity of sentences, vague language along with the possibility of discriminatory enforcement, and broad prosecutorial discretion. Unfortunately, the nature on the samples, which had been derived from incomplete records, limited conclusions about implementation or enforcement with the laws. Since these laws have been adopted, scientific understanding of HIV and its transmission has sophisticated considerably: scientists have established the preventive effect of antiretroviral therapy, and they can now estimate the threat of HIV transmission related with particular activities additional accurately5---8 and identify viral strains that diverse folks carry.9 HIV-specific criminal laws have not kept pace with these scientific advances.BACKGROUNDCharacteristics of HIV-specific laws happen to be described elsewhere.2---4 Existing laws consist of each crimes in which HIV status may be the only element distinguishing an act from legal behavior (e.g., consensual sex) and those for which obtaining HIV increases the severity of an existing crime and imposes higher punishment (e.g., prostitution, sexual assault). Although no complete record of HIVrelated criminal circumstances exists, two research have analyzed US prosecutions more than time. Researchers have identified many concerns with HIVspecific statutes and their enforcement.since fairly couple of persons are incarcerated for HIV exposure2,ten and new infections can occur in prison.11 There is also tiny proof to recommend that criminalizing HIV exposure modifications social norms: studies have discovered that persons living in states with and with out HIV-specific laws10,12 and persons that are aware and unaware of their state's HIV-specific law13 usually do not differ on perceived duty for preventing HIV transmission.10 Proof that the criminal law produces a deterrent effect-- like prompting persons with HIV to disclose much more typically or have safer sex with fewer partners--has been mixed. Awareness of a state's HIV-specific law was connected with sooner (but not much more frequent) seropositive status disclosure in 1 study,14 and worry of prosecution for nondisclosure was linked with seropositive status disclosure in yet another.15 Other research have located no evidence of deterrence,ten,12 and none have discovered effects of enough magnitude to decrease HIV prevalence at a population level.Doable Negative Influence on Public Well being EffortsLaws that criminalize HIV exposure may possibly really undermine public overall health efforts by, as an example, delivering a disincentive for persons at threat to become tested (lest men and women turn out to be conscious of their infection and must disclose it to sex partners) or by reinforcing discrimination against persons living with HIV (PLHIV) and exacerbating HIV-related stigma.