Відмінності між версіями «7 eight 9 10 11 12 Depressive symptoms T1 Depressive symptoms T2 Depressive symptoms T3 Expressive suppression»

7 eight 9 ten 11 12 [https://www.medchemexpress.com/fosamprenavir-calcium-salt.html MedChemExpress GW433908G] Depressive symptoms T1 Depressive symptoms T2 Depressive symptoms T3 Expressive suppression T1 Expressive suppression T2 Expressive suppression T3 Parental assistance T1 Parental help T2 Parental help T3 Victimization T1 Victimization T2 Victimization T3 ?.47 .36 .24 .24 .19 two.38 two.26 2.27 .36 .24 .22 two .55 ?.51 .13 .26 .19 two.20 two.30 2.28 .16 .22 .26 ?.08 .16 .21 two.14 2.20 2.30 .16 .19 .31 three .47 .57 4 .27 .21 .22 ?.36 .33 two.16 2.12 2.16 .08 two.04 .08 ?.47 two.13 two.16 two.15 .02 .ten .01 ?two.13 2.15 two.21 2.00 2.02 .12 5 .28 .36 .25 .46 6 .20 .23 .35 .36 .51 7 two.39 two.30 2.30 2.22 2.23 two.14 ?.54 .54 two.13 .04 2.01 ?.61 .06 .08 .01 ?2.04 .03 two.11 8 two.37 2.42 2.34 two.19 2.31 2.30 .62 9 two.33 2.41 two.39 two.22 two.30 2.33 .60 .73 ten .22 .18 .18 .22 .11 .26 two.04 two.12 -.19 ?.61 .72 ?.80 11 .14 .16 .ten .09 .21 .07 2.12 two.16 2.19 .12 .21 .08 .25 .07 .02 .08 two.11 two.08 .00 .31 .42 ?Above the diagonal for girls; below the diagonal for boys. Correlations involving [https://www.medchemexpress.com/GDC-0941.html GDC-0941] variables 1? are Pearson correlations and involving variables 10?three tetrachoric correlations. Correlations of variables 1? with variables ten?2 are biserial correlations. Correlations in bold are substantial with no less than p \ .expressive suppression and less parental help at all time points for each boys and girls. Moreover, parental assistance [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00360 title= fpsyg.2015.00360] was negatively related with expressive suppression on all time points. This correlation between help and suppression was stronger for girls than for boys at T2 (Fisher test: Z = 3.20, p \ .01) and T3 (Fisher test: Z = two.94, p \ .01). Gender, age, ethnicity and educational level have been moderately correlated with some variables from the crosslagged model and have been therefore made use of as covariates. Gender was positively related to depressive symptoms T1 (b = .23, p \ .001), T2 (b = .15, p \ .001) and T3 (b = .10, p \ .001) and with suppression T1 (b = -.19, p \ .001) and T2 (b = -.11, p \ .001). Age was negatively connected with parental support T1 (b = -.09, p \ .001). Ethnicity was positively associated to depressive symptoms T1 (b = .09, p \ .001) and suppression T1 (b = .10, p \ .001). Educational level was negatively related to depressive symptoms T1 (b = -.09, p \ .001). Girls showed far more depressive symptoms than boys (T1, T2 and T3) and seasoned less suppression (T1, T2). Older adolescents knowledgeable less parental assistance (T1). Ethnic minority groups showed extra depression and suppression at T1. Larger levels of educational level showed reduce levels of depressive symptoms (T1). The Cross-Lagged Models The results of the cross-lagged Model 1 (model with parental assistance) [https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408988111 title= pnas.1408988111] are presented in Fig. 1. All attainable paths amongst the latent variables from T1 to T2 and from T2 to T3 had been tested in one analysis. Non-significant paths aren't shown in the model except if 1 of two cross pathswere important.