Відмінності між версіями «16.6 48 (57.14) 68 (80.95) 31 (36.90) 58 (69.05) 30 (35.61) 35 (41.67) 24 (28.57) 42 (50.00) N ( ) N=84 Non-affiliatedBackground qualities of Yo Puedo participants by gang affiliationp»

Поточна версія на 23:08, 4 січня 2018

16.6 48 (57.14) 68 (80.95) 31 (36.90) 58 (69.05) 30 (35.61) 35 (41.67) 24 (28.57) 42 (50.00) N ( ) N=84 Non-affiliatedBackground characteristics of Yo Puedo participants by gang affiliationp value 0.01 0.12 0.07 0.63 0.ten 0.11 0.12 0.54 0.02 0.02 ** 0.0.28 0.28 0.52 0.66 0.02 0.Sociodemographic traits Mean age Female Latino/a Foreign-born Attended middle school within the USA Maternal educationGhigh school Crowded housing conditionsa Maternal initial birth 18 years Social solutions advantages use Element loss in Drosophila is homolog dependent. Cell 1990, 62:515?25. 106. Engels WR, Preston college and education In college now Skipped college 94 days in past monthb Educational aspirations Higher college or equivalent Trade school, vocational college, or some college College title= j.neuron.2016.04.018 graduate or sophisticated degree Educational barriers Do not understand how to pay for it Don't know specifications to apply Never have credits or grades Motivation Sexual health and history Sexually active (ever) Mean age at first sexVAN DOMMELEN-GONZALEZ ET AL.TABLE 1 Gang-affiliated N=78 N ( ) 18 (33.96) 73 (93.59) 25.44 50 (64.10) 24 (30.77) 36 (46.15) 10 (11.90) 15 (17.86) 79 (94.09) 25.58 35 (41.67) 17 (38.64) N title= rstb.2013.0181 ( ) N=84 p value 0.66 0.90 0.84 ** 0.01 ** Non-affiliatedHOMIES WITH ASPIRATIONS AND Constructive PEERContinuedUnprotected sex previously 6 monthsc Pregnancy intentions Undoubtedly usually do not desire to get pregnant in the subsequent six months Ideal age for a initial child Accessed reproductive wellness services in the past 6 months Substance use Frequent alcohol use Frequent marijuana useaMore than 1 person per area, US CensusbAmong those at present in schoolcAmong these who have had sex in the past six months**pG0.VAN DOMMELEN-GONZALEZ ET AL.TABLEClose friend* network traits by gang affiliation Gang-affiliated N=78 N ( ) Non-affiliated N=84 N ( ) five 57 (67.86) 43 (51.19) 82 21 18 29 76 (97.62) (25.00) (21.43) (34.52) (90.48) p worth 0.02 0.43 0.01 0.14 0.14 0.22 0.50 0.20 ** ** **Mean variety of close mates (SD three.79?.57) Foreign-born Live inside your neighborhood Positive traits Presently in college At the moment within a 2-year college At present in a 4-year college Presently in a job-training system Strategy to visit a 4-year college Risk traits Skip or reduce class no less than once per week Have spent a evening in juvenile detention or prison Happen to be pregnant/gotten somebody pregnant7 59 (75.64) 59 (75.64) 73 30 26 33 69 (93.59) (38.46) (33.33) (42.31) (88.46)56 (71.79) 57 (73.08) 44 (56.41)37 (44.05) 24 (28.57) 19 (22.62)*"people you commit time with or kick it with more than other people or trust greater than other people and may incorporate blood relatives" **pG0.optimistic characteristic associated with a reduced odds of frequent substance use was obtaining close good friends who plan to visit a 4-year college (Table 3, Model 1). Parcels, mainly include somewhat dense, intact housing. The roads all have Possessing close buddies who have spent time in detention (OR, 7.37; p=0.01) and who have been/gotten somebody pregnant (OR, 2.74; p = 0.03) were considerably connected with an increased odds of frequent alcohol use.