Відмінності між версіями «T) yields about 2400 articles dealing with visual interest?2011 Elsevier Ltd. All»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
(Створена сторінка: Several critiques on visual focus have been published within the last 25 years within the Annual Critique of Psychology (Chun, Golomb, Turk-Browne, 2011; Eget...)
 
м
 
(не показана одна проміжна версія ще одного учасника)
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
Several critiques on visual focus have been published within the last 25 years within the Annual Critique of Psychology (Chun, Golomb,  Turk-Browne, 2011; Egeth  Yantis, 1997; Johnston  Dark, 1986; Kinchla, 1992; Logan, 2004; Pashler, Johnston,  [http://collaborate.karivass.com/members/parcel3ghana/activity/1025834/ Overt spatial consideration: endogenous and exogenous William James described two distinct] Ruthruff, 2001; Posner  Rothbart, 2007) and Annual [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161664 title= journal.pone.0161664] Overview of Neuroscience (Bisley  Goldberg, 2010; Colby  Goldberg, 1999; Desimone  Duncan, 1995; Kastner  Ungerleider, 2000; Knudsen, 2007; Posner  Petersen, 1990; Reynolds  Chelazzi, 2004). The appeal of visual focus appears to become connected to an observation that may be probably to disconcert a conventional vision scientist: altering an observer's attentional state although keeping the retinal image continual can influence perceptual performance along with the activity of `sensory' neurons all through visual cortex. For over a century, the study of visual interest has attracted several of the greatest thinkers in psychology, neurophysiology and perceptual sciences, like Hermann von Helmholtz, Wilhelm Wundt and William James. Additional lately (1960?980s), many psychologists, such as Michael Posner, Anne Treisman, Donald Broadbent and Ulric Neisser, have supplied distinct theories and created experimental paradigms to investigate what focus does and what perceptual processes it impacts. Initially, there was a terrific deal of interest in categorizing mechanisms of vision as pre-attentive or attentive. The interest in that distinction has waned as quite a few studies have shown that focus basically impacts tasks that were once regarded pre-attentive, which include contrast discrimination, texture segmentation and acuity. In the past 25 years, and particularly within the last 15, there has been a increasing interest in the mechanisms of visual interest: how visual interest modulates the spatial and temporal sensitivity of early perceptual filters, how interest influences the collection of stimuli of interest, how and exactly where the neuronal responses are modulated, what neural computations underlie the selection processes, and how interest and eye movements interact. Our understanding of visual attention has advanced substantially for the duration of this epoch as a result of a number of elements: (1) psychophysical study on humans has systemat.T) yields about 2400 articles dealing with visual attention?2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.CarrascoPagesince 1980. Nearly half of those articles were published since 2005, with over 250 published in 2010 alone (Fig. 1a). Of these, slightly greater than half had been behavioral research (cognitive and psychophysical), and slightly less than half have been neurophysiological. Various critiques on visual interest have already been published in the last 25 years inside the Annual Overview of Psychology (Chun, Golomb,  Turk-Browne, 2011; Egeth  Yantis, 1997; Johnston  Dark, 1986; Kinchla, 1992; Logan, 2004; Pashler, Johnston,  Ruthruff, 2001; Posner  Rothbart, 2007) and Annual [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161664 title= journal.pone.0161664] Evaluation of Neuroscience (Bisley  Goldberg, 2010; Colby  Goldberg, 1999; Desimone  Duncan, 1995; Kastner  Ungerleider, 2000; Knudsen, 2007; Posner  Petersen, 1990; Reynolds  Chelazzi, 2004). The very first paper in Vision Research that identified attention as a crucial word was published in 1976, and only six extra papers had been published through the 1980s. The number of articles on consideration published since the 1980s is about 330. The price of publication has steadily elevated with time, the amount of publications more than doubling every single 5 years from 1970 by way of 2005. This expansion has continued, though not as pronouncedly, with about 50  additional papers published in 2005?010 than in 2000?005 (Fig. 1b).
+
Previously 25 years, and especially inside the final 15, there has been a developing interest within the mechanisms of visual attention: how visual attention modulates the spatial and [http://s154.dzzj001.com/comment/html/?221829.html Her support the idea that the endogenous and exogenous mechanisms represent] temporal sensitivity of early perceptual filters, how interest influences the selection of stimuli of interest, how and where the neuronal responses are modulated, what neural computations underlie the selection processes, and how interest and eye movements interact. Of those, slightly more than half have been behavioral research (cognitive and psychophysical), and slightly significantly less than half had been neurophysiological. Many testimonials on visual attention have already been published within the last 25 years within the Annual Assessment of Psychology (Chun, Golomb,  Turk-Browne, 2011; Egeth  Yantis, 1997; Johnston  Dark, 1986; Kinchla, 1992; Logan, 2004; Pashler, Johnston,  Ruthruff, 2001; Posner  Rothbart, 2007) and Annual [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161664 title= journal.pone.0161664] Assessment of Neuroscience (Bisley  Goldberg, 2010; Colby  Goldberg, 1999; Desimone  Duncan, 1995; Kastner  Ungerleider, 2000; Knudsen, 2007; Posner  Petersen, 1990; Reynolds  Chelazzi, 2004). The first paper in Vision Research that identified attention as a essential word was published in 1976, and only 6 more papers had been published throughout the 1980s. The number of articles on interest published because the 1980s is about 330. The rate of publication has steadily enhanced with time, the amount of publications greater than doubling each five years from 1970 by means of 2005. This expansion has continued, even though not as pronouncedly, with about 50  far more papers published in 2005?010 than in 2000?005 (Fig. 1b). These articles have largely focused on behavioral investigation, with roughly a single in six [https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S108966 title= CPAA.S108966] articles possessing a focus on neurophysiology. In line with this growth in interest, [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160000 title= journal.pone.0160000] 3 specific problems on visual interest have been published in Vision Study during the last decade (Baldassi, Burr, Carrasco, Eckstein,  Verghese, 2004; Carrasco, Eckstein, Verghese, Boynton,  Treue, 2009; Spekreijse, 2000). The appeal of visual consideration appears to be associated to an observation that is definitely most likely to disconcert a traditional vision scientist: altering an observer's attentional state though keeping the retinal image constant can impact perceptual overall performance as well as the activity of `sensory' neurons throughout visual cortex. For over a century, the study of visual attention has attracted a number of the greatest thinkers in psychology, neurophysiology and perceptual sciences, such as Hermann von Helmholtz, Wilhelm Wundt and William James. Extra recently (1960?980s), a lot of psychologists, like Michael Posner, Anne Treisman, Donald Broadbent and Ulric Neisser, have provided distinct theories and developed experimental paradigms to investigate what consideration does and what perceptual processes it impacts. Initially, there was an incredible deal of interest in categorizing mechanisms of vision as pre-attentive or attentive. The interest in that distinction has waned as quite a few research have shown that consideration in fact affects tasks that had been once deemed pre-attentive, including contrast discrimination, texture segmentation and acuity. Previously 25 years, and specially inside the final 15, there has been a growing interest within the mechanisms of visual interest: how visual consideration modulates the spatial and temporal sensitivity of early perceptual filters, how focus influences the collection of stimuli of interest, how and where the neuronal responses are modulated, what neural computations underlie the choice processes, and how focus and eye movements interact.

Поточна версія на 07:40, 28 лютого 2018

Previously 25 years, and especially inside the final 15, there has been a developing interest within the mechanisms of visual attention: how visual attention modulates the spatial and Her support the idea that the endogenous and exogenous mechanisms represent temporal sensitivity of early perceptual filters, how interest influences the selection of stimuli of interest, how and where the neuronal responses are modulated, what neural computations underlie the selection processes, and how interest and eye movements interact. Of those, slightly more than half have been behavioral research (cognitive and psychophysical), and slightly significantly less than half had been neurophysiological. Many testimonials on visual attention have already been published within the last 25 years within the Annual Assessment of Psychology (Chun, Golomb, Turk-Browne, 2011; Egeth Yantis, 1997; Johnston Dark, 1986; Kinchla, 1992; Logan, 2004; Pashler, Johnston, Ruthruff, 2001; Posner Rothbart, 2007) and Annual title= journal.pone.0161664 Assessment of Neuroscience (Bisley Goldberg, 2010; Colby Goldberg, 1999; Desimone Duncan, 1995; Kastner Ungerleider, 2000; Knudsen, 2007; Posner Petersen, 1990; Reynolds Chelazzi, 2004). The first paper in Vision Research that identified attention as a essential word was published in 1976, and only 6 more papers had been published throughout the 1980s. The number of articles on interest published because the 1980s is about 330. The rate of publication has steadily enhanced with time, the amount of publications greater than doubling each five years from 1970 by means of 2005. This expansion has continued, even though not as pronouncedly, with about 50 far more papers published in 2005?010 than in 2000?005 (Fig. 1b). These articles have largely focused on behavioral investigation, with roughly a single in six title= CPAA.S108966 articles possessing a focus on neurophysiology. In line with this growth in interest, title= journal.pone.0160000 3 specific problems on visual interest have been published in Vision Study during the last decade (Baldassi, Burr, Carrasco, Eckstein, Verghese, 2004; Carrasco, Eckstein, Verghese, Boynton, Treue, 2009; Spekreijse, 2000). The appeal of visual consideration appears to be associated to an observation that is definitely most likely to disconcert a traditional vision scientist: altering an observer's attentional state though keeping the retinal image constant can impact perceptual overall performance as well as the activity of `sensory' neurons throughout visual cortex. For over a century, the study of visual attention has attracted a number of the greatest thinkers in psychology, neurophysiology and perceptual sciences, such as Hermann von Helmholtz, Wilhelm Wundt and William James. Extra recently (1960?980s), a lot of psychologists, like Michael Posner, Anne Treisman, Donald Broadbent and Ulric Neisser, have provided distinct theories and developed experimental paradigms to investigate what consideration does and what perceptual processes it impacts. Initially, there was an incredible deal of interest in categorizing mechanisms of vision as pre-attentive or attentive. The interest in that distinction has waned as quite a few research have shown that consideration in fact affects tasks that had been once deemed pre-attentive, including contrast discrimination, texture segmentation and acuity. Previously 25 years, and specially inside the final 15, there has been a growing interest within the mechanisms of visual interest: how visual consideration modulates the spatial and temporal sensitivity of early perceptual filters, how focus influences the collection of stimuli of interest, how and where the neuronal responses are modulated, what neural computations underlie the choice processes, and how focus and eye movements interact.