Відмінності між версіями «Reflections From Reading Sacred Pleasure by Riane Eisler»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
 
(не показана одна проміжна версія ще одного учасника)
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
I took months to read Sacred Pleasure by Riane Eisler, trying to soak up as a lot of its richness as attainable. Sacred Pleasure is actually a continuation of Dr. Eisler's, The Chalice and The Blade. It is an in-depth investigation of historic gender relations in personal relationships and sexuality. It isn't just about the oppression and suppression of females and the injury that has been accomplished to women. Dr. Eisler also addresses the harm inflicted on males who are pressured to uphold the imbalanced, patriarchal, typically violent, dominator system that we all dwell under to increased or lesser levels. This imposed dominator method has still left our intimate associations, to say the minimum, fractured.In western cultures it appears that there is a real drive to get back the intimacy and partnership that was intended by nature to be the foundation of male-feminine bonding. But, I feel the actuality is that we have so a lot of patterns to unlearn and so considerably reconstructing to do that even even though we can see the issues obviously, it is not distinct at all how to deal with them.
+
Sacred Pleasure is [http://www.anobii.com/groups/01f96acb99dda8cd70/ Various Meditations in Motion As Effective Stress Management Techniques] really a continuation of Dr. Eisler's, The Chalice and The Blade. It is an in-depth examination of historic gender relations in personal associations and sexuality. It is not just about the oppression and suppression of females and the damage that has been done to women. This imposed dominator technique has left our intimate relationships, to say the the very least, fractured.In western cultures it seems that there is a actual press to regain the intimacy and partnership that was meant by character to be the foundation of male-feminine bonding. But, I think the fact is that we have so a lot of designs to unlearn and so considerably reconstructing to do that even though we can see the problems obviously, it isn't very clear at all how to deal with them.
  
I have provided considerably believed to this and a single factor I come back again to is the relevance of the basic ability of identifying and communicating one's own emotions. Naturally, it assists also to dwell in a "free" culture and given that the U.S. is the only modern society I have first-hand information of, you can assume that is the context I'm doing work from. Of course, if you reside in a culture in which women have limited personalized independence, then studying to discover and connect thoughts is not the first step [http://www.sayjack.com/learn/english/vocabulary/254475/ Reflections From Reading Sacred Pleasure by Riane Eisler] towards producing a far more egalitarian modern society or toward strengthening intimate associations.But, to return to my level, I have noticed that my younger son and myself in specific refer to and respond to a total selection of thoughts - uncomfortable, sad ones - as anger. It would seem that our assortment for determining emotions is incredibly slender. And, most typically when I discover my robust adverse feelings as anger, I'm not even particular why I'm offended. This leads me to the belief that I am misidentifying some adverse emotions - most very likely emotions of concern, worry and disappointment - as anger.There is a prolonged historical past of buried emotions in the two women and gentlemen. Particularly, I think women have a tendency to bury their damaging thoughts, while men have a tendency to bury their constructive thoughts. As a child, I keep in mind inquiring my mother what was incorrect when she appeared unhappy, angry or upset. The widespread response I obtained was, "nothing". So, not to area blame, but just for needs of determining my possess shortcomings, this dialogue is my basis for identifying and sharing my thoughts: "What's improper?" "Nothing."
+
I have offered significantly believed to this and a single issue I arrive back again to is the significance of the straightforward skill of pinpointing and speaking one's very own feelings. Clearly, it aids also to stay in a "free" culture and because the U.S. is the only society I have first-hand knowledge of, you can assume that is the context I'm working from. Of course, if you dwell in a society in which women have restricted personal freedom, then learning to recognize and communicate thoughts isn't the initial step in the direction of making a more egalitarian culture or in direction of improving intimate interactions.But, to return to my position, I have seen that my youthful son and myself in distinct refer to and react to a total variety of thoughts - unpleasant, sad ones - as anger. It seems that our range for figuring out feelings is really slim. And, most usually when I discover my sturdy adverse emotions as anger, I'm not even particular why I'm offended. This sales opportunities me to the perception that I am misidentifying some unfavorable emotions - most probably inner thoughts of concern, fret and frustration - as anger.There is a long heritage of buried feelings in each females and males. Specifically, I believe women have a tendency to bury their adverse feelings, while males have a tendency to bury their optimistic emotions. As a little one, I keep in mind asking my mom what was improper when she appeared unhappy, offended or upset. The frequent solution I acquired was, "nothing". So, not to area blame, but just for reasons of determining my personal shortcomings, this dialogue is my foundation for determining and sharing my inner thoughts: "What's wrong?" "Nothing at all."
  
One particular widespread sample of communicating from the gentlemen in my family members is teasing. For lack of a far more optimistic way of relating, the men by and massive use teasing as their only signifies of connecting with or relating to family members. It doesn't get much a lot more twisted than this!These are my observations so far towards the purpose of deciphering the code of unhealthy romantic relationship styles.
+
One typical pattern of communicating from the gentlemen in my loved ones is teasing. For absence of a much more constructive way of relating, the guys by and large use teasing as their only implies of connecting with or relating to family members. Again, this is a way of attempting to display optimistic feelings by communicating negatively. It doesn't get a lot much more twisted than this!These are my observations so considerably toward the aim of deciphering the code of harmful partnership patterns. For, as Dr. Eisler correctly factors out, right up until we restore and recreate healthier approaches of interacting in our personal associations, there isn't significantly of a chance of studying nonviolent conflict resolution on a planetary scale.

Поточна версія на 01:16, 12 січня 2017

Sacred Pleasure is Various Meditations in Motion As Effective Stress Management Techniques really a continuation of Dr. Eisler's, The Chalice and The Blade. It is an in-depth examination of historic gender relations in personal associations and sexuality. It is not just about the oppression and suppression of females and the damage that has been done to women. This imposed dominator technique has left our intimate relationships, to say the the very least, fractured.In western cultures it seems that there is a actual press to regain the intimacy and partnership that was meant by character to be the foundation of male-feminine bonding. But, I think the fact is that we have so a lot of designs to unlearn and so considerably reconstructing to do that even though we can see the problems obviously, it isn't very clear at all how to deal with them.

I have offered significantly believed to this and a single issue I arrive back again to is the significance of the straightforward skill of pinpointing and speaking one's very own feelings. Clearly, it aids also to stay in a "free" culture and because the U.S. is the only society I have first-hand knowledge of, you can assume that is the context I'm working from. Of course, if you dwell in a society in which women have restricted personal freedom, then learning to recognize and communicate thoughts isn't the initial step in the direction of making a more egalitarian culture or in direction of improving intimate interactions.But, to return to my position, I have seen that my youthful son and myself in distinct refer to and react to a total variety of thoughts - unpleasant, sad ones - as anger. It seems that our range for figuring out feelings is really slim. And, most usually when I discover my sturdy adverse emotions as anger, I'm not even particular why I'm offended. This sales opportunities me to the perception that I am misidentifying some unfavorable emotions - most probably inner thoughts of concern, fret and frustration - as anger.There is a long heritage of buried feelings in each females and males. Specifically, I believe women have a tendency to bury their adverse feelings, while males have a tendency to bury their optimistic emotions. As a little one, I keep in mind asking my mom what was improper when she appeared unhappy, offended or upset. The frequent solution I acquired was, "nothing". So, not to area blame, but just for reasons of determining my personal shortcomings, this dialogue is my foundation for determining and sharing my inner thoughts: "What's wrong?" "Nothing at all."

One typical pattern of communicating from the gentlemen in my loved ones is teasing. For absence of a much more constructive way of relating, the guys by and large use teasing as their only implies of connecting with or relating to family members. Again, this is a way of attempting to display optimistic feelings by communicating negatively. It doesn't get a lot much more twisted than this!These are my observations so considerably toward the aim of deciphering the code of harmful partnership patterns. For, as Dr. Eisler correctly factors out, right up until we restore and recreate healthier approaches of interacting in our personal associations, there isn't significantly of a chance of studying nonviolent conflict resolution on a planetary scale.