Відмінності між версіями «N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
 
(не показані 14 проміжних версій 13 учасників)
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
211, 329?36. Richardson, D. C., and Dale, R. (2005). Seeking to understand:
+
Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Proof of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. [https://www.medchemexpress.com/GSK2656157.html GSK2656157] Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of international attributes in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Tiny, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes within the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving with each other: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Even though previous study has recommended that specific factors--such as similarity to the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), really little investigation has examined how interest impacts our potential to empathize. Previous study suggests that empathy may happen instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even if we are cognitively busy. On the other hand, other research suggests that empathy is disrupted when we are distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Simply because attentional sources are typically depleted during daily interactions, it is actually significant to understand if empathy is automatically engaged or calls for controlled and effortful processing. Thus, the present study examines the part of automaticity and focus in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA essential purpose to look at empathy for many feelings below several different attentional situations is that it makes it possible for for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Earlier analysis has identified neural regions which might be regularly activated for the duration of empathy for physical pain (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These dependable activations within the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). Nevertheless, it's unknown no matter whether the dACC and AI are necessary to empathic processes additional normally (i.e., not just empathy for pain) and whether or not these regions are activated through empathy for each optimistic and adverse feelings. Current neuroimaging investigation suggests that other neural regions--such because the [https://www.medchemexpress.com/GSK2656157.html GSK2656157 web] medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; BA 10), dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC; BA 9), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC; BA 11)--may be involved in empathic processes.N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of worldwide attributes in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Little, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes in the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving together: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D.
−
Empathy permits us to know and share others' feelings, generating a bridge amongst the self as well as the innermost experiences of an additional individual. As we interact with others in our each day lives, we might respond empathically to a single individual, but fail to connect with how a different individual is feeling. While earlier research has recommended that specific [https://www.medchemexpress.com/BLU9931.html BLU-9931 web] factors--such as similarity towards the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), pretty tiny analysis has examined how consideration impacts our ability to empathize. Previous analysis suggests that empathy could occur instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even though we are cognitively busy. Nonetheless, other analysis suggests that empathy is disrupted when we are distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Due to the fact attentional resources are usually depleted through each day interactions, it can be critical to understand if empathy is automatically engaged or calls for controlled and effortful processing. Therefore, the existing study examines the role of automaticity and interest in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA key purpose to appear at empathy for many emotions under many different attentional circumstances is that it allows for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Prior analysis has identified neural regions that are consistently activated throughout empathy for physical pain (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These reputable activations inside the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are a part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). Having said that, it is unknown no matter if the dACC and AI are vital to empathic processes additional usually (i.e., not only empathy for discomfort) and irrespective of whether these regions are activated through empathy for each constructive and unfavorable feelings. Recent neuroimaging research suggests that other neural regions--such because the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; BA ten), dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC; BA 9), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC; BA 11)--may be involved in empathic processes.N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R. A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects around the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Proof of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of worldwide attributes in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Modest, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes within the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829.
+

Поточна версія на 12:44, 9 вересня 2017

Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Proof of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. GSK2656157 Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of international attributes in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Tiny, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes within the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving with each other: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Even though previous study has recommended that specific factors--such as similarity to the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), really little investigation has examined how interest impacts our potential to empathize. Previous study suggests that empathy may happen instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even if we are cognitively busy. On the other hand, other research suggests that empathy is disrupted when we are distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Simply because attentional sources are typically depleted during daily interactions, it is actually significant to understand if empathy is automatically engaged or calls for controlled and effortful processing. Thus, the present study examines the part of automaticity and focus in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA essential purpose to look at empathy for many feelings below several different attentional situations is that it makes it possible for for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Earlier analysis has identified neural regions which might be regularly activated for the duration of empathy for physical pain (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These dependable activations within the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). Nevertheless, it's unknown no matter whether the dACC and AI are necessary to empathic processes additional normally (i.e., not just empathy for pain) and whether or not these regions are activated through empathy for each optimistic and adverse feelings. Current neuroimaging investigation suggests that other neural regions--such because the GSK2656157 web medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; BA 10), dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC; BA 9), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC; BA 11)--may be involved in empathic processes.N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of worldwide attributes in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Little, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes in the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving together: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D.

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=N_Psychophysiology._Lewin,_K._(1936)._Principles_of_Topological_Psychology._New_York,_NY&oldid=227045