Відмінності між версіями «N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
 
(не показані 5 проміжних версій 5 учасників)
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Smaller, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes within the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Empathy allows us to [https://www.medchemexpress.com/Pirfenidone.html Pirfenidone price] understand and share others' feelings, producing a bridge involving the self as well as the innermost experiences of an additional person. As we interact with other folks in our daily lives, we may respond empathically to one particular person, but fail to connect with how yet another person is feeling. While preceding analysis has suggested that particular factors--such as similarity for the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), very tiny research has examined how consideration impacts our potential to empathize. Past research suggests that empathy may take place instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even if we are cognitively busy. On the other hand, other research suggests that empathy is disrupted when we're distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Mainly because attentional sources are normally depleted through everyday interactions, it truly is critical to understand if empathy is automatically engaged or requires controlled and effortful processing. As a result, the present study examines the part of automaticity and attention in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA crucial explanation to appear at empathy for a number of emotions below many different attentional circumstances is that it allows for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Previous research has identified neural regions which might be regularly activated through empathy for physical pain (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These dependable activations within the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). On the other hand, it is unknown irrespective of whether the dACC and AI are vital to empathic processes much more usually (i.e., not only empathy for pain) and whether or not these regions are activated in the course of empathy for each positive and unfavorable emotions. Current neuroimaging study suggests that other neural regions--such because the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; BA ten), [https://www.medchemexpress.com/Brigatinib.html AP-26113] dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC; BA 9), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC; BA 11)--may be involved in empathic processes.N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R. A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects around the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: the precedence of international functions in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Tiny, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T.
+
Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Proof of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. [https://www.medchemexpress.com/GSK2656157.html GSK2656157] Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of international attributes in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Tiny, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes within the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving with each other: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Even though previous study has recommended that specific factors--such as similarity to the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), really little investigation has examined how interest impacts our potential to empathize. Previous study suggests that empathy may happen instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even if we are cognitively busy. On the other hand, other research suggests that empathy is disrupted when we are distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Simply because attentional sources are typically depleted during daily interactions, it is actually significant to understand if empathy is automatically engaged or calls for controlled and effortful processing. Thus, the present study examines the part of automaticity and focus in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA essential purpose to look at empathy for many feelings below several different attentional situations is that it makes it possible for for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Earlier analysis has identified neural regions which might be regularly activated for the duration of empathy for physical pain (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These dependable activations within the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). Nevertheless, it's unknown no matter whether the dACC and AI are necessary to empathic processes additional normally (i.e., not just empathy for pain) and whether or not these regions are activated through empathy for each optimistic and adverse feelings. Current neuroimaging investigation suggests that other neural regions--such because the [https://www.medchemexpress.com/GSK2656157.html GSK2656157 web] medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; BA 10), dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC; BA 9), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC; BA 11)--may be involved in empathic processes.N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of worldwide attributes in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Little, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes in the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving together: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D.

Поточна версія на 12:44, 9 вересня 2017

Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Proof of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. GSK2656157 Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of international attributes in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Tiny, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes within the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving with each other: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Even though previous study has recommended that specific factors--such as similarity to the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), really little investigation has examined how interest impacts our potential to empathize. Previous study suggests that empathy may happen instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even if we are cognitively busy. On the other hand, other research suggests that empathy is disrupted when we are distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Simply because attentional sources are typically depleted during daily interactions, it is actually significant to understand if empathy is automatically engaged or calls for controlled and effortful processing. Thus, the present study examines the part of automaticity and focus in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA essential purpose to look at empathy for many feelings below several different attentional situations is that it makes it possible for for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Earlier analysis has identified neural regions which might be regularly activated for the duration of empathy for physical pain (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These dependable activations within the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). Nevertheless, it's unknown no matter whether the dACC and AI are necessary to empathic processes additional normally (i.e., not just empathy for pain) and whether or not these regions are activated through empathy for each optimistic and adverse feelings. Current neuroimaging investigation suggests that other neural regions--such because the GSK2656157 web medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; BA 10), dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC; BA 9), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC; BA 11)--may be involved in empathic processes.N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of worldwide attributes in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Little, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes in the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving together: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D.

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=N_Psychophysiology._Lewin,_K._(1936)._Principles_of_Topological_Psychology._New_York,_NY&oldid=227045