Відмінності між версіями «= 0.99). Relating to productivity from institutions, the»
м |
м |
||
| Рядок 1: | Рядок 1: | ||
| − | + | Concerning [http://about:blank http://about:blank] productivity from institutions, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Centers for Illness Prevention and Control (CDC) ranked initial and second respectively (Table 4). Six of your major ten productive institutions had been based in the USA, one was WHO, although the remaining three have been based inside the UK, Germany and Taiwan. There was a sturdy important and inverse connection (r = - 0.83, p 0.01) between rank from the institution along with the total citations for publication for every single institution. Institution which ranked initially had the highest total citation while those in rank quantity ten had the least total citations. Related relationship existed amongst rank of the institution plus the h-index (r = - 0.913, p 0.01). Relating to leading productive authors, no substantial dominance was noticed and most authors within the prime ten list had study productivity between 142 articles (Table 5). Having said that, the majority of authors (90 ) in the top ten list had been from the USA even though the last one particular in the list was from Spain. Top ten productive authors is shown in Table five. There was no substantial correlation (p > 0.05) among the rank with the authorand the percentage of extremely cited articles published by the authors.Citation analysis and most cited articlesA total of 1702 (75.07 ) articles have been cited no less than as soon as; the remaining articles weren't cited at all. Cited articles were further analyzed employing VOSviewer to create visualization maps. Co-authorship evaluation employing VOSviewer showed three clusters of authors (Fig. three). Cluster number 1 incorporated 14 authors, three of them had been among the top rated ten productive authors: Parvez, F (116 co-authorships), Ahsan, H (113 co-authorships), and Chen, Y (112 co-authorships). Authors with larger number of co-authorships had greater collaboration compared with those with decrease quantity of co-authorships. Furthermore, authors within the very same cluster are those with closer collaboration when compared with authors who exist in other clusters. Cluster number two integrated 12 authors, 1 of them was in the major ten productive authors; Colford Jr, J.M (17 co-authorships). Cluster quantity 3 included 11 authors, four of them were within the top rated ten productive list: Wade, T.J (47 co-authorships), Calderon, R.I (34 co-authorships), Craun, G.F (36 coauthorships), and Beach M.J (36 co-authorships). The top rated cited articles are shown in Table six [6, 7, 9, 217]. The major cited post was about arsenic in drinking water in Bangladesh and received a total of 919 citations. The write-up was published within the Bulletin of theTable 1 Poisson loglinear regression for worldwide research productivity on water associated illnesses working with the keyword "microbiology"Parameter (Intercept) Keyword (microbiology) B three.086 .058 P .000 .000 Exp (B) 21.881 1.059 95 Wald Self-assurance Interval for Exp(B) Reduced 20.073 1.056 Upper 23.853 1.Dependent variable: worldwide productivity. Predictor variable: number of articles with keyword "microbiology". B: coefficient estimates; Exp(B): Exponentiated values in the coefficientsSweileh et al. Nevertheless, no studies have already been carried out to assess the all round health elements of unsafe drinking or recreational water. Bibliometric evaluation on water in general and water technologies have already been also carried out with no focusing on overall health associated concerns [314]. | |
Поточна версія на 17:49, 20 вересня 2017
Concerning http://about:blank productivity from institutions, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Centers for Illness Prevention and Control (CDC) ranked initial and second respectively (Table 4). Six of your major ten productive institutions had been based in the USA, one was WHO, although the remaining three have been based inside the UK, Germany and Taiwan. There was a sturdy important and inverse connection (r = - 0.83, p 0.01) between rank from the institution along with the total citations for publication for every single institution. Institution which ranked initially had the highest total citation while those in rank quantity ten had the least total citations. Related relationship existed amongst rank of the institution plus the h-index (r = - 0.913, p 0.01). Relating to leading productive authors, no substantial dominance was noticed and most authors within the prime ten list had study productivity between 142 articles (Table 5). Having said that, the majority of authors (90 ) in the top ten list had been from the USA even though the last one particular in the list was from Spain. Top ten productive authors is shown in Table five. There was no substantial correlation (p > 0.05) among the rank with the authorand the percentage of extremely cited articles published by the authors.Citation analysis and most cited articlesA total of 1702 (75.07 ) articles have been cited no less than as soon as; the remaining articles weren't cited at all. Cited articles were further analyzed employing VOSviewer to create visualization maps. Co-authorship evaluation employing VOSviewer showed three clusters of authors (Fig. three). Cluster number 1 incorporated 14 authors, three of them had been among the top rated ten productive authors: Parvez, F (116 co-authorships), Ahsan, H (113 co-authorships), and Chen, Y (112 co-authorships). Authors with larger number of co-authorships had greater collaboration compared with those with decrease quantity of co-authorships. Furthermore, authors within the very same cluster are those with closer collaboration when compared with authors who exist in other clusters. Cluster number two integrated 12 authors, 1 of them was in the major ten productive authors; Colford Jr, J.M (17 co-authorships). Cluster quantity 3 included 11 authors, four of them were within the top rated ten productive list: Wade, T.J (47 co-authorships), Calderon, R.I (34 co-authorships), Craun, G.F (36 coauthorships), and Beach M.J (36 co-authorships). The top rated cited articles are shown in Table six [6, 7, 9, 217]. The major cited post was about arsenic in drinking water in Bangladesh and received a total of 919 citations. The write-up was published within the Bulletin of theTable 1 Poisson loglinear regression for worldwide research productivity on water associated illnesses working with the keyword "microbiology"Parameter (Intercept) Keyword (microbiology) B three.086 .058 P .000 .000 Exp (B) 21.881 1.059 95 Wald Self-assurance Interval for Exp(B) Reduced 20.073 1.056 Upper 23.853 1.Dependent variable: worldwide productivity. Predictor variable: number of articles with keyword "microbiology". B: coefficient estimates; Exp(B): Exponentiated values in the coefficientsSweileh et al. Nevertheless, no studies have already been carried out to assess the all round health elements of unsafe drinking or recreational water. Bibliometric evaluation on water in general and water technologies have already been also carried out with no focusing on overall health associated concerns [314].
