Відмінності між версіями «Ith joint angle than the S.E.A. and B.A.»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
 
(не показані 6 проміжних версій 3 учасників)
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
(2015), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.21/[https://www.medchemexpress.com/TIC10.html ONC-201 web] Figure 11 Hip flexor/extensor moment arms plotted against joint angle for key proximal thigh muscles. The outcomes for the OM muscle have improved matching amongst studies, indicating a lateral/external rotation action for this huge muscle. Likewise, our ISF data and those of B.A.S. match pretty closely, with constant lateral/external rotator action. The FCM and FCLP muscles have amongst the biggest LAR moment arms for all muscle tissues (0.08 m; also observed for our ILp muscle) in our data, but each muscle tissues lessen their lateral rotator action with growing hip flexion. In B.A.S.'s information a weaker, opposite (medial/internal rotator) trend with hip flexion was discovered for the FCM, whereas the FCL muscle maintained a little lateral/external rotator action (Fig. 12). The uniarticular hip muscles' LAR moment arms of our model are likely to switch much less generally (at in vivo hip joint angles 300 ; e.g., Fig. S5) from medial to lateral rotation or vice versa (Fig. 13). The IFI, even so, remains primarily as a weak medial rotator except at extreme hip flexion (>60 ). B.A.S.'s information favoured stronger medial/internal rotation moment arms for the IFI but otherwise had a related pattern. Our IFE muscle's information indicate a switch from lateral rotation into medial rotation near a 30 hip flexion angle, matched fairly closely by B.A.S.'s data.Ith joint angle than the S.E.A. and B.A.S. information because we had to constrain this muscle's path in 3D to avoid it cutting by means of bones or other obstacles in some poses. Note also how the S.E.A. results in general show powerful modifications with joint angles, whereas the more constrained muscle geometry of our model and B.A.S.'s outcomes in extra modest alterations (Fig. 11). Long-axis rotation (LAR; in Figs. 12 and 13) moment arms for hip muscles only enable comparisons amongst our data and these of B.A.S . Moreover, taking into consideration that B.A.S. plotted these moment arms against hip flexion/extension joint angle (modified data shown; Karl T. Bates, pers. comm., 2015), we show them that way right here but also plot them against hip LAR joint angle in the Supporting Info (Figs. S1 and S2); even so, we do not go over the latter outcomes right here. For the AMB1,two muscle tissues we come across consistently weak, near-zero LAR action (lateral/external rotation), whereas B.A.S. showed a steeply decreasing hip medial/internal LAR moment arm as the hip is flexedHutchinson et al. (2015), PeerJ, DOI ten.7717/peerj.21/Figure 11 Hip flexor/extensor moment arms plotted against joint angle for crucial proximal thigh muscle tissues. See captions for Figs. 9 and 10.Figure 12 Hip long-axis rotation (LAR) moment arms plotted against hip flexion/extension joint angle for key proximal thigh muscle tissues. See caption for Fig. 9.Hutchinson et al. (2015), PeerJ, DOI ten.7717/peerj.22/Figure 13 Hip long-axis rotation (LAR) moment arms plotted against hip flexion/extension joint angle for important proximal thigh muscle tissues. See caption for Fig. 9.(Fig.
+
outcomes in general show powerful adjustments with joint angles, whereas the much more constrained [https://www.medchemexpress.com/Tirapazamine.html SR259075] muscle geometry of our model and B.A.S.'s results in extra modest adjustments (Fig. 11). Long-axis rotation (LAR; in Figs. 12 and 13) moment arms for hip muscles only enable comparisons involving our data and these of B.A.S . Furthermore, thinking of that B.A.S. plotted these moment arms against hip flexion/extension joint angle (modified information shown; Karl T. Bates, pers. comm., 2015), we show them that way here but also plot them against hip LAR joint angle in the Supporting Information (Figs. S1 and S2); nonetheless, we don't go over the latter results right here. For the AMB1,two muscle tissues we obtain consistently weak, near-zero LAR action (lateral/external rotation), whereas B.A.S. showed a steeply decreasing hip medial/internal LAR moment arm as the hip is flexedHutchinson et al. (2015), PeerJ, DOI ten.7717/peerj.21/Figure 11 Hip flexor/extensor moment arms plotted against joint angle for crucial proximal thigh muscle tissues. See captions for Figs. In contrast, our IC and IL muscle information agree properly with B.A.S.'s in possessing a shallow improve in the medial/internal LAR moment arm with hip flexion, though B.A.S.'s data considerably much more strongly favour a medial [https://www.medchemexpress.com/TMP269.html TMP269 web] rotator function for the IC muscle. Long-axis rotation (LAR; in Figs. 12 and 13) moment arms for hip muscles only enable comparisons involving our data and these of B.A.S . Moreover, thinking of that B.A.S. plotted these moment arms against hip flexion/extension joint angle (modified data shown; Karl T. Bates, pers. comm., 2015), we show them that way right here but also plot them against hip LAR joint angle within the Supporting Info (Figs. S1 and S2); even so, we do not go over the latter outcomes right here. For the AMB1,two muscle tissues we obtain consistently weak, near-zero LAR action (lateral/external rotation), whereas B.A.S. showed a steeply decreasing hip medial/internal LAR moment arm because the hip is flexedHutchinson et al. (2015), PeerJ, DOI ten.7717/peerj.21/Figure 11 Hip flexor/extensor moment arms plotted against joint angle for crucial proximal thigh muscle tissues. See captions for Figs. 9 and 10.Figure 12 Hip long-axis rotation (LAR) moment arms plotted against hip flexion/extension joint angle for key proximal thigh muscle tissues. See caption for Fig. 9.Hutchinson et al. (2015), PeerJ, DOI ten.7717/peerj.22/Figure 13 Hip long-axis rotation (LAR) moment arms plotted against hip flexion/extension joint angle for important proximal thigh muscle tissues. See caption for Fig. 9.(Fig. 12). In contrast, our IC and IL muscle information agree well with B.A.S.'s in obtaining a shallow boost in the medial/internal LAR moment arm with hip flexion, though B.A.S.'s data significantly much more strongly favour a medial rotator function for the IC muscle. Our outcomes for the two parts with the ILFB muscle are very various from B.A.S.'s in trending toward stronger medial/internal rotation function because the hip is flexed, whereas B.A.S.'s favour lateral/external rotation.

Поточна версія на 23:45, 17 листопада 2017

outcomes in general show powerful adjustments with joint angles, whereas the much more constrained SR259075 muscle geometry of our model and B.A.S.'s results in extra modest adjustments (Fig. 11). Long-axis rotation (LAR; in Figs. 12 and 13) moment arms for hip muscles only enable comparisons involving our data and these of B.A.S . Furthermore, thinking of that B.A.S. plotted these moment arms against hip flexion/extension joint angle (modified information shown; Karl T. Bates, pers. comm., 2015), we show them that way here but also plot them against hip LAR joint angle in the Supporting Information (Figs. S1 and S2); nonetheless, we don't go over the latter results right here. For the AMB1,two muscle tissues we obtain consistently weak, near-zero LAR action (lateral/external rotation), whereas B.A.S. showed a steeply decreasing hip medial/internal LAR moment arm as the hip is flexedHutchinson et al. (2015), PeerJ, DOI ten.7717/peerj.21/Figure 11 Hip flexor/extensor moment arms plotted against joint angle for crucial proximal thigh muscle tissues. See captions for Figs. In contrast, our IC and IL muscle information agree properly with B.A.S.'s in possessing a shallow improve in the medial/internal LAR moment arm with hip flexion, though B.A.S.'s data considerably much more strongly favour a medial TMP269 web rotator function for the IC muscle. Long-axis rotation (LAR; in Figs. 12 and 13) moment arms for hip muscles only enable comparisons involving our data and these of B.A.S . Moreover, thinking of that B.A.S. plotted these moment arms against hip flexion/extension joint angle (modified data shown; Karl T. Bates, pers. comm., 2015), we show them that way right here but also plot them against hip LAR joint angle within the Supporting Info (Figs. S1 and S2); even so, we do not go over the latter outcomes right here. For the AMB1,two muscle tissues we obtain consistently weak, near-zero LAR action (lateral/external rotation), whereas B.A.S. showed a steeply decreasing hip medial/internal LAR moment arm because the hip is flexedHutchinson et al. (2015), PeerJ, DOI ten.7717/peerj.21/Figure 11 Hip flexor/extensor moment arms plotted against joint angle for crucial proximal thigh muscle tissues. See captions for Figs. 9 and 10.Figure 12 Hip long-axis rotation (LAR) moment arms plotted against hip flexion/extension joint angle for key proximal thigh muscle tissues. See caption for Fig. 9.Hutchinson et al. (2015), PeerJ, DOI ten.7717/peerj.22/Figure 13 Hip long-axis rotation (LAR) moment arms plotted against hip flexion/extension joint angle for important proximal thigh muscle tissues. See caption for Fig. 9.(Fig. 12). In contrast, our IC and IL muscle information agree well with B.A.S.'s in obtaining a shallow boost in the medial/internal LAR moment arm with hip flexion, though B.A.S.'s data significantly much more strongly favour a medial rotator function for the IC muscle. Our outcomes for the two parts with the ILFB muscle are very various from B.A.S.'s in trending toward stronger medial/internal rotation function because the hip is flexed, whereas B.A.S.'s favour lateral/external rotation.

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ith_joint_angle_than_the_S.E.A._and_B.A.&oldid=254643