Відмінності між версіями «.52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) six.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м (.52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) six.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-)
 
(не показано 4 проміжні версії 3 учасників)
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
The impact of years of education and [http://kfyst.com/comment/html/?327157.html Sequences in BOLD: 2, barcode compliant sequences: 2. Biology/ecology. Solitary. Host: Elachistidae] history of dengue amongst households elevated dengue knowledge only among low- and medium-level information profiles. The impact of a lot more than one particular individual reporting housekeeping inside the very same household as their principal occupation had a damaging effect around the middle- and high-level information scores..52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) six.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-0.13?.04) 0.17* (-0.01?.34) -0.08 (-0.19?.04) -0.02 (-0.09?.06) 0.21*** (0.12?.31) Medium 50th quantile 0.04** (0.01?.07) 0.03*** (0.02?.04) -0.02 (-0.ten?.07) 0.38*** (0.28?.48) 0.39*** (0.28?.49) 0.15** (0.02?.28) 0.14** (0.01?.28) 0.34** (0.03?.64) 0.21** (0.02?.41) -0.07** (-0.13?0.00) -0.02 (-0.06?.02) 0.04 (-0.05?.13) -0.11*** (-0.15?0.08) 0.02 (-0.02?.06) 0.07** (0.01?.12) High 87.24th quantile 0 (-0.03?.03) 0.02*** (0.01?.03) -0.05 (-0.15?.04) 0.51*** [https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010112 bmjopen-2015-010112] (0.40?.62) 0.51*** (0.41?.62) 0.23*** (0.14?.33) 0.28*** (0.11?.45) 0.2 (-0.13?.52) 0.24* (-0.04?.52) 0.02 (-0.05?.08) 0.02 (-0.04?.08) 0 (-0.10?.ten) -0.08** (-0.15?0.01) 0.03 (-0.01?.07) 0.02 (-0.03?.07)PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases | DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005016 September 28,9 /KAP Surveys and Dengue Handle in ColombiaTable 3. (Continued) Low VARIABLES Women Each High costs inside the household Males Females Both Every day costs in the household Men Ladies Each Continuous Observations Self-assurance interval in parentheses *** p[https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/abn0000128 abn0000128] 0.04 (-1.29?.36) six.8th quantile (-4.69?.66) -1.95 (-4.53?.62) -1.99 (-4.56?.58) Medium 50th quantile (-1.78?.25) -0.35 (-1.81?.11) -0.3 (-1.79?.19) High 87.24th quantile (-0.85?.75) 0.36 (-0.90?.62) 0.48 (-0.80?.76)strata, were determinants of your practices scores. Gender choice producing didn't show a correlation either.DiscussionTo our information, this can be the initial time that MCA has been applied to analyze knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning dengue to create an ordinal score from a data set with a number of categorical variables. The effect of years of education and history of dengue among households increased dengue expertise only among low- and medium-level expertise profiles. The effect of a lot more than one particular individual reporting housekeeping inside the identical household as their principal occupation had a adverse impact on the middle- and high-level expertise scores. Furthermore, decision generating about family wellness care shared by guys and women enhanced the score of knowledge at any level.
+
The [http://www.medchemexpress.com/Lurbinectedin.html Lurbinectedin site] impact of years of education and history of dengue amongst households improved dengue know-how only amongst low- and medium-level expertise profiles. The impact of more than one particular particular person reporting housekeeping within the identical household as their principal occupation had a negative effect on the middle- and high-level know-how scores..52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) 6.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-0.13?.04) 0.17* (-0.01?.34) -0.08 (-0.19?.04) -0.02 (-0.09?.06) 0.21*** (0.12?.31) Medium 50th quantile 0.04** (0.01?.07) 0.03*** (0.02?.04) -0.02 (-0.10?.07) 0.38*** (0.28?.48) 0.39*** (0.28?.49) 0.15** (0.02?.28) 0.14** (0.01?.28) 0.34** (0.03?.64) 0.21** (0.02?.41) -0.07** (-0.13?0.00) -0.02 (-0.06?.02) 0.04 (-0.05?.13) -0.11*** (-0.15?0.08) 0.02 (-0.02?.06) 0.07** (0.01?.12) High 87.24th quantile 0 (-0.03?.03) 0.02*** (0.01?.03) -0.05 (-0.15?.04) 0.51*** [https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010112 bmjopen-2015-010112] (0.40?.62) 0.51*** (0.41?.62) 0.23*** (0.14?.33) 0.28*** (0.11?.45) 0.2 (-0.13?.52) 0.24* (-0.04?.52) 0.02 (-0.05?.08) 0.02 (-0.04?.08) 0 (-0.10?.10) -0.08** (-0.15?0.01) 0.03 (-0.01?.07) 0.02 (-0.03?.07)PLOS Neglected Tropical Ailments | DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005016 September 28,9 /KAP Surveys and Dengue Manage in ColombiaTable three. (Continued) Low VARIABLES Females Each Higher expenses within the household Guys Girls Both Each day costs inside the household Men Females Each Continual Observations Self-confidence interval in parentheses *** p[https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/abn0000128 abn0000128] 0.04 (-1.29?.36) 6.8th quantile (-4.69?.66) -1.95 (-4.53?.62) -1.99 (-4.56?.58) Medium 50th quantile (-1.78?.25) -0.35 (-1.81?.11) -0.3 (-1.79?.19) High 87.24th quantile (-0.85?.75) 0.36 (-0.90?.62) 0.48 (-0.80?.76)strata, had been determinants in the practices scores.

Поточна версія на 19:26, 14 квітня 2018

The Lurbinectedin site impact of years of education and history of dengue amongst households improved dengue know-how only amongst low- and medium-level expertise profiles. The impact of more than one particular particular person reporting housekeeping within the identical household as their principal occupation had a negative effect on the middle- and high-level know-how scores..52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) 6.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-0.13?.04) 0.17* (-0.01?.34) -0.08 (-0.19?.04) -0.02 (-0.09?.06) 0.21*** (0.12?.31) Medium 50th quantile 0.04** (0.01?.07) 0.03*** (0.02?.04) -0.02 (-0.10?.07) 0.38*** (0.28?.48) 0.39*** (0.28?.49) 0.15** (0.02?.28) 0.14** (0.01?.28) 0.34** (0.03?.64) 0.21** (0.02?.41) -0.07** (-0.13?0.00) -0.02 (-0.06?.02) 0.04 (-0.05?.13) -0.11*** (-0.15?0.08) 0.02 (-0.02?.06) 0.07** (0.01?.12) High 87.24th quantile 0 (-0.03?.03) 0.02*** (0.01?.03) -0.05 (-0.15?.04) 0.51*** bmjopen-2015-010112 (0.40?.62) 0.51*** (0.41?.62) 0.23*** (0.14?.33) 0.28*** (0.11?.45) 0.2 (-0.13?.52) 0.24* (-0.04?.52) 0.02 (-0.05?.08) 0.02 (-0.04?.08) 0 (-0.10?.10) -0.08** (-0.15?0.01) 0.03 (-0.01?.07) 0.02 (-0.03?.07)PLOS Neglected Tropical Ailments | DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005016 September 28,9 /KAP Surveys and Dengue Manage in ColombiaTable three. (Continued) Low VARIABLES Females Each Higher expenses within the household Guys Girls Both Each day costs inside the household Men Females Each Continual Observations Self-confidence interval in parentheses *** pabn0000128 0.04 (-1.29?.36) 6.8th quantile (-4.69?.66) -1.95 (-4.53?.62) -1.99 (-4.56?.58) Medium 50th quantile (-1.78?.25) -0.35 (-1.81?.11) -0.3 (-1.79?.19) High 87.24th quantile (-0.85?.75) 0.36 (-0.90?.62) 0.48 (-0.80?.76)strata, had been determinants in the practices scores.

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=.52**_(-1.02%3F0.01)_-0.51*_(-1.03%3F.02)_six.8th_quantile_0.14***_(0.06%3F.22)_0.06***_(0.03%3F.09)_0.07_(-0.13%3F.28)_0.34**_(0.02%3F.67)_0.47***_(0.24%3F.69)_0.17_(-0.14%3F.47)_0.47***_(0.14%3F.80)_0.66**_(0.14%3F.17)_0.55**_(0.09%3F.01)_-0.03_(-0.14%3F.08)_-0.05_(-&oldid=310512