Відмінності між версіями «.52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) six.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м (.52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) six.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-)
 
(не показано 3 проміжні версії 3 учасників)
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
Ultimately, practices scores were not connected to any of the measured sociodemographic or gender decision-making variables..52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) 6.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-0.13?.04) 0.17* (-0.01?.34) -0.08 (-0.19?.04) -0.02 (-0.09?.06) 0.21*** (0.12?.31) Medium 50th quantile 0.04** (0.01?.07) 0.03*** (0.02?.04) -0.02 (-0.ten?.07) 0.38*** (0.28?.48) 0.39*** (0.28?.49) 0.15** (0.02?.28) 0.14** (0.01?.28) 0.34** (0.03?.64) 0.21** (0.02?.41) -0.07** (-0.13?0.00) -0.02 (-0.06?.02) 0.04 (-0.05?.13) -0.11*** (-0.15?0.08) 0.02 (-0.02?.06) 0.07** (0.01?.12) Higher 87.24th quantile 0 (-0.03?.03) 0.02*** (0.01?.03) -0.05 (-0.15?.04) 0.51*** [https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010112 bmjopen-2015-010112] (0.40?.62) 0.51*** (0.41?.62) 0.23*** (0.14?.33) 0.28*** (0.11?.45) 0.2 (-0.13?.52) 0.24* (-0.04?.52) 0.02 (-0.05?.08) 0.02 (-0.04?.08) 0 (-0.10?.ten) -0.08** (-0.15?0.01) 0.03 (-0.01?.07) 0.02 (-0.03?.07)PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases | DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005016 September 28,9 /KAP Surveys and Dengue Manage in ColombiaTable 3. (Continued) Low VARIABLES Girls Each Higher expenditures inside the household Males Girls Each Every day expenditures inside the household Men Girls Each Continual Observations Confidence interval in parentheses *** p[https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/abn0000128 abn0000128] 0.04 (-1.29?.36) six.8th quantile (-4.69?.66) -1.95 (-4.53?.62) -1.99 (-4.56?.58) Medium 50th quantile (-1.78?.25) -0.35 (-1.81?.11) -0.3 (-1.79?.19) High 87.24th quantile (-0.85?.75) 0.36 (-0.90?.62) 0.48 (-0.80?.76)strata, have been determinants with the practices scores. Gender decision generating didn't show a correlation either.DiscussionTo our knowledge, this is the initial time that MCA has been applied to analyze know-how, attitudes, and practices [http://www.tongji.org/members/nurse84garage/activity/784656/ Agellomerus 2/length of flagellomerus 14: 2.6?.8. Tarsal claws: with single basal spine ike] relating to dengue to produce an ordinal score from a data set with numerous categorical variables. The influence of years of education and history of dengue among households improved dengue knowledge only amongst low- and medium-level know-how profiles.
+
The [http://www.medchemexpress.com/Lurbinectedin.html Lurbinectedin site] impact of years of education and history of dengue amongst households improved dengue know-how only amongst low- and medium-level expertise profiles. The impact of more than one particular particular person reporting housekeeping within the identical household as their principal occupation had a negative effect on the middle- and high-level know-how scores..52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) 6.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-0.13?.04) 0.17* (-0.01?.34) -0.08 (-0.19?.04) -0.02 (-0.09?.06) 0.21*** (0.12?.31) Medium 50th quantile 0.04** (0.01?.07) 0.03*** (0.02?.04) -0.02 (-0.10?.07) 0.38*** (0.28?.48) 0.39*** (0.28?.49) 0.15** (0.02?.28) 0.14** (0.01?.28) 0.34** (0.03?.64) 0.21** (0.02?.41) -0.07** (-0.13?0.00) -0.02 (-0.06?.02) 0.04 (-0.05?.13) -0.11*** (-0.15?0.08) 0.02 (-0.02?.06) 0.07** (0.01?.12) High 87.24th quantile 0 (-0.03?.03) 0.02*** (0.01?.03) -0.05 (-0.15?.04) 0.51*** [https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010112 bmjopen-2015-010112] (0.40?.62) 0.51*** (0.41?.62) 0.23*** (0.14?.33) 0.28*** (0.11?.45) 0.2 (-0.13?.52) 0.24* (-0.04?.52) 0.02 (-0.05?.08) 0.02 (-0.04?.08) 0 (-0.10?.10) -0.08** (-0.15?0.01) 0.03 (-0.01?.07) 0.02 (-0.03?.07)PLOS Neglected Tropical Ailments | DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005016 September 28,9 /KAP Surveys and Dengue Manage in ColombiaTable three. (Continued) Low VARIABLES Females Each Higher expenses within the household Guys Girls Both Each day costs inside the household Men Females Each Continual Observations Self-confidence interval in parentheses *** p[https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/abn0000128 abn0000128] 0.04 (-1.29?.36) 6.8th quantile (-4.69?.66) -1.95 (-4.53?.62) -1.99 (-4.56?.58) Medium 50th quantile (-1.78?.25) -0.35 (-1.81?.11) -0.3 (-1.79?.19) High 87.24th quantile (-0.85?.75) 0.36 (-0.90?.62) 0.48 (-0.80?.76)strata, had been determinants in the practices scores.

Поточна версія на 19:26, 14 квітня 2018

The Lurbinectedin site impact of years of education and history of dengue amongst households improved dengue know-how only amongst low- and medium-level expertise profiles. The impact of more than one particular particular person reporting housekeeping within the identical household as their principal occupation had a negative effect on the middle- and high-level know-how scores..52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) 6.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-0.13?.04) 0.17* (-0.01?.34) -0.08 (-0.19?.04) -0.02 (-0.09?.06) 0.21*** (0.12?.31) Medium 50th quantile 0.04** (0.01?.07) 0.03*** (0.02?.04) -0.02 (-0.10?.07) 0.38*** (0.28?.48) 0.39*** (0.28?.49) 0.15** (0.02?.28) 0.14** (0.01?.28) 0.34** (0.03?.64) 0.21** (0.02?.41) -0.07** (-0.13?0.00) -0.02 (-0.06?.02) 0.04 (-0.05?.13) -0.11*** (-0.15?0.08) 0.02 (-0.02?.06) 0.07** (0.01?.12) High 87.24th quantile 0 (-0.03?.03) 0.02*** (0.01?.03) -0.05 (-0.15?.04) 0.51*** bmjopen-2015-010112 (0.40?.62) 0.51*** (0.41?.62) 0.23*** (0.14?.33) 0.28*** (0.11?.45) 0.2 (-0.13?.52) 0.24* (-0.04?.52) 0.02 (-0.05?.08) 0.02 (-0.04?.08) 0 (-0.10?.10) -0.08** (-0.15?0.01) 0.03 (-0.01?.07) 0.02 (-0.03?.07)PLOS Neglected Tropical Ailments | DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005016 September 28,9 /KAP Surveys and Dengue Manage in ColombiaTable three. (Continued) Low VARIABLES Females Each Higher expenses within the household Guys Girls Both Each day costs inside the household Men Females Each Continual Observations Self-confidence interval in parentheses *** pabn0000128 0.04 (-1.29?.36) 6.8th quantile (-4.69?.66) -1.95 (-4.53?.62) -1.99 (-4.56?.58) Medium 50th quantile (-1.78?.25) -0.35 (-1.81?.11) -0.3 (-1.79?.19) High 87.24th quantile (-0.85?.75) 0.36 (-0.90?.62) 0.48 (-0.80?.76)strata, had been determinants in the practices scores.

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=.52**_(-1.02%3F0.01)_-0.51*_(-1.03%3F.02)_six.8th_quantile_0.14***_(0.06%3F.22)_0.06***_(0.03%3F.09)_0.07_(-0.13%3F.28)_0.34**_(0.02%3F.67)_0.47***_(0.24%3F.69)_0.17_(-0.14%3F.47)_0.47***_(0.14%3F.80)_0.66**_(0.14%3F.17)_0.55**_(0.09%3F.01)_-0.03_(-0.14%3F.08)_-0.05_(-&oldid=310512