Відмінності між версіями «.52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) 6.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
 
(не показана одна проміжна версія ще одного учасника)
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
.52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) 6.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-0.13?.04) 0.17* (-0.01?.34) -0.08 (-0.19?.04) -0.02 (-0.09?.06) 0.21*** (0.12?.31) Medium 50th quantile 0.04** (0.01?.07) 0.03*** (0.02?.04) -0.02 (-0.ten?.07) 0.38*** (0.28?.48) 0.39*** (0.28?.49) 0.15** (0.02?.28) 0.14** (0.01?.28) 0.34** (0.03?.64) 0.21** (0.02?.41) -0.07** (-0.13?0.00) -0.02 (-0.06?.02) 0.04 (-0.05?.13) -0.11*** (-0.15?0.08) 0.02 (-0.02?.06) 0.07** (0.01?.12) Higher 87.24th quantile 0 (-0.03?.03) 0.02*** (0.01?.03) -0.05 (-0.15?.04) 0.51*** [https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010112 bmjopen-2015-010112] (0.40?.62) 0.51*** (0.41?.62) 0.23*** (0.14?.33) 0.28*** (0.11?.45) 0.two (-0.13?.52) 0.24* (-0.04?.52) 0.02 (-0.05?.08) 0.02 (-0.04?.08) 0 (-0.10?.ten) -0.08** (-0.15?0.01) 0.03 (-0.01?.07) 0.02 (-0.03?.07)PLOS Neglected Tropical Illnesses | DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005016 [http://www.gameshampoo.com/478017/91407-38174-srnp-2437-paratypes-bmnh-inbio-inhs-nmnh-costa-rica 10.91407, -85.38174, 09-SRNP-2437. Paratypes. 29 , 34  (BMNH, CNC, INBIO, INHS, NMNH). COSTA RICA, ACG] September 28,9 /KAP Surveys and Dengue Manage in ColombiaTable 3. (Continued) Low VARIABLES Ladies Both Higher expenditures within the household Males Girls Both Each day costs within the household Males Ladies Both Constant Observations Confidence interval in parentheses *** p[https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/abn0000128 abn0000128] 0.04 (-1.29?.36) 6.8th quantile (-4.69?.66) -1.95 (-4.53?.62) -1.99 (-4.56?.58) Medium 50th quantile (-1.78?.25) -0.35 (-1.81?.11) -0.three (-1.79?.19) High 87.24th quantile (-0.85?.75) 0.36 (-0.90?.62) 0.48 (-0.80?.76)strata, were determinants on the practices scores. Gender choice creating did not show a correlation either.DiscussionTo our expertise, this really is the initial time that MCA has been applied to analyze know-how, attitudes, and practices concerning dengue to generate an ordinal score from a information set with numerous categorical variables.
+
This regression estimates where controlled by effects due to number of inhabitants per household, numbers of years living in the neighborhood or dwelling, and, non-linear effects of years of education and age. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005016.t003 1.06 (-0.98?.11) 1.05 (-1.01?.11) 1.07 (-0.85?.99) 0.56 (-1.12?.24) 3725 1.14 (-0.74?.01) 1.36 (-0.52?.24) 1.21 (-0.69?.11) 2.31*** (1.07?.55) 3725 0.1 (-1.65?.85) 0.28 (-1.44?.00) 0.25 (-1.49?.99) 3.98*** (2.91?.05) 3725 0.14 (-1.64?.92) 0.36 (-1.47?.19) 0.48 (-1.27?.24) 0.24 (-1.06?.55) 0.3 (-0.99?.58) 0.28 (-1.00?.56) 0.06 (-1.31?.42) 0.17 (-1.20?.54) [https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/abn0000128 abn0000128] 0.04 (-1.29?.36) six.8th quantile (-4.69?.66) -1.95 (-4.53?.62) -1.99 (-4.56?.58) Medium 50th quantile (-1.78?.25) -0.35 (-1.81?.11) -0.3 (-1.79?.19) High 87.24th quantile (-0.85?.75) 0.36 (-0.90?.62) 0.48 (-0.80?.76)strata, have been determinants of the practices scores. Gender selection creating did not show a correlation either.DiscussionTo our understanding, this really is the very first time that MCA has been applied to analyze knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding dengue to produce an ordinal score from a information set with a number of categorical variables..52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) six.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-0.13?.04) 0.17* (-0.01?.34) -0.08 (-0.19?.04) -0.02 (-0.09?.06) 0.21*** (0.12?.31) Medium 50th quantile 0.04** (0.01?.07) 0.03*** (0.02?.04) -0.02 (-0.ten?.07) 0.38*** (0.28?.48) 0.39*** (0.28?.49) 0.15** (0.02?.28) 0.14** (0.01?.28) 0.34** (0.03?.64) 0.21** (0.02?.41) -0.07** (-0.13?0.00) -0.02 (-0.06?.02) 0.04 (-0.05?.13) -0.11*** (-0.15?0.08) 0.02 (-0.02?.06) 0.07** (0.01?.12) High 87.24th quantile 0 (-0.03?.03) 0.02*** (0.01?.03) -0.05 (-0.15?.04) 0.51*** [https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010112 bmjopen-2015-010112] (0.40?.62) 0.51*** (0.41?.62) 0.23*** (0.14?.33) 0.28*** (0.11?.45) 0.2 (-0.13?.52) 0.24* (-0.04?.52) 0.02 (-0.05?.08) 0.02 (-0.04?.08) 0 (-0.10?.10) -0.08** (-0.15?0.01) 0.03 (-0.01?.07) 0.02 (-0.03?.07)PLOS Neglected Tropical Illnesses | DOI:ten.1371/journal.pntd.0005016 September 28,9 /KAP Surveys and Dengue Manage in ColombiaTable 3. Ultimately, practices [http://forum.timdata.top/index.php?qa=130389&qa_1=than-physique-head-to-apex-of-metasoma-not-extending-beyond R than physique (head to apex of metasoma), not extending beyond] scores were not associated to any with the measured sociodemographic or gender decision-making variables.

Поточна версія на 22:47, 31 березня 2018

This regression estimates where controlled by effects due to number of inhabitants per household, numbers of years living in the neighborhood or dwelling, and, non-linear effects of years of education and age. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005016.t003 1.06 (-0.98?.11) 1.05 (-1.01?.11) 1.07 (-0.85?.99) 0.56 (-1.12?.24) 3725 1.14 (-0.74?.01) 1.36 (-0.52?.24) 1.21 (-0.69?.11) 2.31*** (1.07?.55) 3725 0.1 (-1.65?.85) 0.28 (-1.44?.00) 0.25 (-1.49?.99) 3.98*** (2.91?.05) 3725 0.14 (-1.64?.92) 0.36 (-1.47?.19) 0.48 (-1.27?.24) 0.24 (-1.06?.55) 0.3 (-0.99?.58) 0.28 (-1.00?.56) 0.06 (-1.31?.42) 0.17 (-1.20?.54) abn0000128 0.04 (-1.29?.36) six.8th quantile (-4.69?.66) -1.95 (-4.53?.62) -1.99 (-4.56?.58) Medium 50th quantile (-1.78?.25) -0.35 (-1.81?.11) -0.3 (-1.79?.19) High 87.24th quantile (-0.85?.75) 0.36 (-0.90?.62) 0.48 (-0.80?.76)strata, have been determinants of the practices scores. Gender selection creating did not show a correlation either.DiscussionTo our understanding, this really is the very first time that MCA has been applied to analyze knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding dengue to produce an ordinal score from a information set with a number of categorical variables..52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) six.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-0.13?.04) 0.17* (-0.01?.34) -0.08 (-0.19?.04) -0.02 (-0.09?.06) 0.21*** (0.12?.31) Medium 50th quantile 0.04** (0.01?.07) 0.03*** (0.02?.04) -0.02 (-0.ten?.07) 0.38*** (0.28?.48) 0.39*** (0.28?.49) 0.15** (0.02?.28) 0.14** (0.01?.28) 0.34** (0.03?.64) 0.21** (0.02?.41) -0.07** (-0.13?0.00) -0.02 (-0.06?.02) 0.04 (-0.05?.13) -0.11*** (-0.15?0.08) 0.02 (-0.02?.06) 0.07** (0.01?.12) High 87.24th quantile 0 (-0.03?.03) 0.02*** (0.01?.03) -0.05 (-0.15?.04) 0.51*** bmjopen-2015-010112 (0.40?.62) 0.51*** (0.41?.62) 0.23*** (0.14?.33) 0.28*** (0.11?.45) 0.2 (-0.13?.52) 0.24* (-0.04?.52) 0.02 (-0.05?.08) 0.02 (-0.04?.08) 0 (-0.10?.10) -0.08** (-0.15?0.01) 0.03 (-0.01?.07) 0.02 (-0.03?.07)PLOS Neglected Tropical Illnesses | DOI:ten.1371/journal.pntd.0005016 September 28,9 /KAP Surveys and Dengue Manage in ColombiaTable 3. Ultimately, practices R than physique (head to apex of metasoma), not extending beyond scores were not associated to any with the measured sociodemographic or gender decision-making variables.