Відмінності між версіями «= 0.99). Concerning productivity from institutions, the»
(Створена сторінка: The write-up was published inside the Bulletin of theTable 1 Poisson loglinear regression for worldwide investigation productivity on water related diseases uti...) |
м (= 0.99). Concerning productivity from institutions, the) |
||
| Рядок 1: | Рядок 1: | ||
| − | + | Regarding leading productive authors, no considerable dominance was observed and most [http://about:blank http://about:blank] authors within the top ten list had research productivity between 142 articles (Table 5). There was a robust important and inverse relationship (r = - 0.83, p 0.01) in between rank with the institution plus the total citations for publication for every institution. Institution which ranked initially had the highest total citation though those in rank quantity ten had the least total citations. Comparable connection existed amongst rank on the institution along with the h-index (r = - 0.913, p 0.01). Regarding leading productive authors, no substantial dominance was seen and most authors in the leading ten list had analysis productivity amongst 142 articles (Table five). Even so, the majority of authors (90 ) in the leading ten list were in the USA even though the final one particular within the list was from Spain. Prime ten productive authors is shown in Table five. There was no important correlation (p > 0.05) among the rank with the authorand the percentage of highly cited articles published by the authors.Citation analysis and most cited articlesA total of 1702 (75.07 ) articles have been cited no less than once; the remaining articles weren't cited at all. Cited articles were additional analyzed using VOSviewer to create visualization maps. Co-authorship evaluation making use of VOSviewer showed 3 clusters of authors (Fig. three). Cluster quantity a single included 14 authors, 3 of them have been among the major ten productive authors: Parvez, F (116 co-authorships), Ahsan, H (113 co-authorships), and Chen, Y (112 co-authorships). Authors with higher quantity of co-authorships had larger collaboration compared with these with decrease number of co-authorships. In addition, authors within the same cluster are those with closer collaboration when compared with authors who exist in other clusters. Cluster quantity two included 12 authors, 1 of them was from the top rated ten productive authors; Colford Jr, J.M (17 co-authorships). Cluster quantity 3 incorporated 11 authors, 4 of them had been within the top rated ten productive list: Wade, T.J (47 co-authorships), Calderon, R.I (34 co-authorships), Craun, G.F (36 coauthorships), and Beach M.J (36 co-authorships). The top cited articles are shown in Table six [6, 7, 9, 217]. The prime cited short article was about arsenic in drinking water in Bangladesh and received a total of 919 citations. The report was published inside the Bulletin of theTable 1 Poisson loglinear regression for worldwide analysis productivity on water related illnesses utilizing the keyword "microbiology"Parameter (Intercept) Keyword (microbiology) B 3.086 .058 P .000 .000 Exp (B) 21.881 1.059 95 Wald Self-assurance Interval for Exp(B) Reduced 20.073 1.056 Upper 23.853 1.Dependent variable: worldwide productivity. Predictor variable: number of articles with keyword "microbiology". B: coefficient estimates; Exp(B): Exponentiated values of your coefficientsSweileh et al. Even so, no research have been carried out to assess the all round overall health elements of unsafe drinking or recreational water. Bibliometric evaluation on water in general and water technologies have been also carried out without having focusing on health associated challenges [314]. Our study showed that there is a increasing interest and research activity on this subject manifested as an rising trend within the quantity of publications specifically within the last decade. | |
Версія за 09:44, 15 вересня 2017
Regarding leading productive authors, no considerable dominance was observed and most http://about:blank authors within the top ten list had research productivity between 142 articles (Table 5). There was a robust important and inverse relationship (r = - 0.83, p 0.01) in between rank with the institution plus the total citations for publication for every institution. Institution which ranked initially had the highest total citation though those in rank quantity ten had the least total citations. Comparable connection existed amongst rank on the institution along with the h-index (r = - 0.913, p 0.01). Regarding leading productive authors, no substantial dominance was seen and most authors in the leading ten list had analysis productivity amongst 142 articles (Table five). Even so, the majority of authors (90 ) in the leading ten list were in the USA even though the final one particular within the list was from Spain. Prime ten productive authors is shown in Table five. There was no important correlation (p > 0.05) among the rank with the authorand the percentage of highly cited articles published by the authors.Citation analysis and most cited articlesA total of 1702 (75.07 ) articles have been cited no less than once; the remaining articles weren't cited at all. Cited articles were additional analyzed using VOSviewer to create visualization maps. Co-authorship evaluation making use of VOSviewer showed 3 clusters of authors (Fig. three). Cluster quantity a single included 14 authors, 3 of them have been among the major ten productive authors: Parvez, F (116 co-authorships), Ahsan, H (113 co-authorships), and Chen, Y (112 co-authorships). Authors with higher quantity of co-authorships had larger collaboration compared with these with decrease number of co-authorships. In addition, authors within the same cluster are those with closer collaboration when compared with authors who exist in other clusters. Cluster quantity two included 12 authors, 1 of them was from the top rated ten productive authors; Colford Jr, J.M (17 co-authorships). Cluster quantity 3 incorporated 11 authors, 4 of them had been within the top rated ten productive list: Wade, T.J (47 co-authorships), Calderon, R.I (34 co-authorships), Craun, G.F (36 coauthorships), and Beach M.J (36 co-authorships). The top cited articles are shown in Table six [6, 7, 9, 217]. The prime cited short article was about arsenic in drinking water in Bangladesh and received a total of 919 citations. The report was published inside the Bulletin of theTable 1 Poisson loglinear regression for worldwide analysis productivity on water related illnesses utilizing the keyword "microbiology"Parameter (Intercept) Keyword (microbiology) B 3.086 .058 P .000 .000 Exp (B) 21.881 1.059 95 Wald Self-assurance Interval for Exp(B) Reduced 20.073 1.056 Upper 23.853 1.Dependent variable: worldwide productivity. Predictor variable: number of articles with keyword "microbiology". B: coefficient estimates; Exp(B): Exponentiated values of your coefficientsSweileh et al. Even so, no research have been carried out to assess the all round overall health elements of unsafe drinking or recreational water. Bibliometric evaluation on water in general and water technologies have been also carried out without having focusing on health associated challenges [314]. Our study showed that there is a increasing interest and research activity on this subject manifested as an rising trend within the quantity of publications specifically within the last decade.
