Відмінності між версіями «= 0.99). Concerning productivity from institutions, the»
м (= 0.99). Concerning productivity from institutions, the) |
м (= 0.99). Concerning productivity from institutions, the) |
||
| Рядок 1: | Рядок 1: | ||
| − | + | [http://about:blank http://about:blank] Co-authorship evaluation working with VOSviewer showed 3 clusters of authors (Fig. Cluster quantity three incorporated 11 authors, four of them have been inside the best ten productive list: Wade, T.J (47 co-authorships), Calderon, R.I (34 co-authorships), Craun, G.F (36 coauthorships), and Beach M.J (36 co-authorships). The major cited articles are shown in Table 6 [6, 7, 9, 217]. The major cited post was about arsenic in drinking water in Bangladesh and received a total of 919 citations. The post was published inside the Bulletin of theTable 1 Poisson loglinear regression for worldwide research productivity on water associated illnesses making use of the keyword "microbiology"Parameter (Intercept) Keyword (microbiology) B three.086 .058 P .000 .000 Exp (B) 21.881 1.059 95 Wald Self-assurance Interval for Exp(B) Lower 20.073 1.056 Upper 23.853 1.Dependent variable: worldwide productivity. Predictor variable: quantity of articles with keyword "microbiology". B: coefficient estimates; Exp(B): Exponentiated values in the coefficientsSweileh et al. Even so, no research have already been carried out to assess the general well being aspects of unsafe drinking or recreational water. Bibliometric evaluation on water generally and water technologies have already been also carried out with no focusing on health associated concerns [314]. Our study showed that there is a expanding interest and investigation activity on this subject manifested as an increasing trend inside the quantity of publications specifically in the last decade.= 0.99). Concerning productivity from institutions, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Centers for Illness Prevention and Control (CDC) ranked first and second respectively (Table four). Six in the best ten productive institutions have been based within the USA, one particular was WHO, when the remaining three had been based in the UK, Germany and Taiwan. There was a robust important and inverse relationship (r = - 0.83, p 0.01) amongst rank of your institution as well as the total citations for publication for each institution. Institution which ranked initial had the highest total citation though those in rank quantity ten had the least total citations. Comparable connection existed among rank of your institution along with the h-index (r = - 0.913, p 0.01). With regards to major productive authors, no important dominance was seen and most authors within the top rated ten list had investigation productivity involving 142 articles (Table 5). Even so, the majority of authors (90 ) within the top ten list were in the USA when the last 1 in the list was from Spain. Top rated ten productive authors is shown in Table five. There was no considerable correlation (p > 0.05) amongst the rank with the authorand the percentage of extremely cited articles published by the authors.Citation evaluation and most cited articlesA total of 1702 (75.07 ) articles have been cited at least when; the remaining articles weren't cited at all. Cited articles have been additional analyzed working with VOSviewer to make visualization maps. Co-authorship evaluation employing VOSviewer showed three clusters of authors (Fig. 3). Cluster quantity a single incorporated 14 authors, 3 of them had been amongst the top ten productive authors: Parvez, F (116 co-authorships), Ahsan, H (113 co-authorships), and Chen, Y (112 co-authorships). | |
Версія за 01:44, 16 вересня 2017
http://about:blank Co-authorship evaluation working with VOSviewer showed 3 clusters of authors (Fig. Cluster quantity three incorporated 11 authors, four of them have been inside the best ten productive list: Wade, T.J (47 co-authorships), Calderon, R.I (34 co-authorships), Craun, G.F (36 coauthorships), and Beach M.J (36 co-authorships). The major cited articles are shown in Table 6 [6, 7, 9, 217]. The major cited post was about arsenic in drinking water in Bangladesh and received a total of 919 citations. The post was published inside the Bulletin of theTable 1 Poisson loglinear regression for worldwide research productivity on water associated illnesses making use of the keyword "microbiology"Parameter (Intercept) Keyword (microbiology) B three.086 .058 P .000 .000 Exp (B) 21.881 1.059 95 Wald Self-assurance Interval for Exp(B) Lower 20.073 1.056 Upper 23.853 1.Dependent variable: worldwide productivity. Predictor variable: quantity of articles with keyword "microbiology". B: coefficient estimates; Exp(B): Exponentiated values in the coefficientsSweileh et al. Even so, no research have already been carried out to assess the general well being aspects of unsafe drinking or recreational water. Bibliometric evaluation on water generally and water technologies have already been also carried out with no focusing on health associated concerns [314]. Our study showed that there is a expanding interest and investigation activity on this subject manifested as an increasing trend inside the quantity of publications specifically in the last decade.= 0.99). Concerning productivity from institutions, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Centers for Illness Prevention and Control (CDC) ranked first and second respectively (Table four). Six in the best ten productive institutions have been based within the USA, one particular was WHO, when the remaining three had been based in the UK, Germany and Taiwan. There was a robust important and inverse relationship (r = - 0.83, p 0.01) amongst rank of your institution as well as the total citations for publication for each institution. Institution which ranked initial had the highest total citation though those in rank quantity ten had the least total citations. Comparable connection existed among rank of your institution along with the h-index (r = - 0.913, p 0.01). With regards to major productive authors, no important dominance was seen and most authors within the top rated ten list had investigation productivity involving 142 articles (Table 5). Even so, the majority of authors (90 ) within the top ten list were in the USA when the last 1 in the list was from Spain. Top rated ten productive authors is shown in Table five. There was no considerable correlation (p > 0.05) amongst the rank with the authorand the percentage of extremely cited articles published by the authors.Citation evaluation and most cited articlesA total of 1702 (75.07 ) articles have been cited at least when; the remaining articles weren't cited at all. Cited articles have been additional analyzed working with VOSviewer to make visualization maps. Co-authorship evaluation employing VOSviewer showed three clusters of authors (Fig. 3). Cluster quantity a single incorporated 14 authors, 3 of them had been amongst the top ten productive authors: Parvez, F (116 co-authorships), Ahsan, H (113 co-authorships), and Chen, Y (112 co-authorships).
