Відмінності між версіями «Generalization (as with experiments) nor theoretical generalization (as with multisite case»

Версія за 12:48, 29 січня 2018

However they do present the facility for heuristic generalization (i.e., to attain a clearer understanding of what exactly is going on), thereby enabling much more productive debate about eHealth programs' complex, interdependent social practices. A national Address correspondence to: Trisha Greenhalgh, Yvonne Carter Creating, 58 Turner Street, London E1 2AB (e mail: p.greenhalgh@qmul.ac.uk).The Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 89, No. four, 2011 (pp. 533?63) c 2011 Milbank Memorial Fund. Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.T. Greenhalgh, J. Russell, R.E. Ashcroft, and W. ParsonseHealth plan is best conceptualized not as a blueprint and implementation strategy for any state-of-the-art technical program but as a series of overlapping, conflicting, and mutually misunderstood language games that combine to generate a situation of ambiguity, paradox, incompleteness, and confusion. But going beyond technical "solutions" and engaging with these language games would clash with the bounded Oposed order of insertion (with getting the lowest and therefore most likely rationality that policymakers ordinarily employ to create their eHealth programs manageable. This could explain their restricted and contained response to the nuanced messages of in-depth case study reports. Conclusion: The complexity of contemporary well being care, combined together with the several stakeholders in large technology initiatives, implies that national eHealth applications need significantly a lot more pondering by means of than has often occurred. We want fewer grand plans and much more understanding communities. The onus, as a result, is on academics to create strategies of drawing judiciously around the richness of case research to inform and influence eHealth policy, which necessarily occurs in a simplified choice atmosphere. Key phrases: eHealth, policymaking, case study, ethnography, evaluation, Wittgenstein, sensemaking, understanding community.eHealth Policy: The Canon of HistoryThose who ignore history are doomed to repeat it. --George Santayana (1863?952)National eHealth programs rarely unfold as predicted, particularly when meticulously planned out in title= f1000research.9271.1 advance. Naturally, that is certainly since they may be complicated and title= s12916-016-0650-2 unpredictable. But policymakers often persist in considering that things will go better next time. Their hubris has reached a level that deserves to be researched in its own appropriate. To that end, this article argues that lessons are rarely learned from national eHealth programs for the reason that insufficient value is placed on in-depth case research, and it tends to make this case on philosophical instead of methodological grounds. We propose that national eHealth programs and, by extension, other For Well being (the branch in the Division of Well being accountable for complex technologies projects with many stakeholders and interdependencies could usefully be reconceptualized as Wittgensteinian language games.Why National eHealth Applications Will need Dead PhilosophersThe United States' 2009 Overall health Data Technology for Financial and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act allocated up to 27 billion for the adoption and "meaningful use" of electronic well being records by physicians and hospitals amongst 2011 and 2015 (Blumenthal and Tavenner 2010). Australia's federal price range for 2010/2011 incorporated A 466.7 million (US 473 million) for the design and style, building, and title= JVI.00458-16 national rollout of a personally controlled electronic well being record (PCEHR) (Westbrook and Braithwaite 2010). By 2010, Canada's Well being Infoway implementation program had been allocated C two.13 billion (US two.16 billion) (Whitt 2010).Generalization (as with experiments) nor theoretical generalization (as with multisite case comparisons or realist evaluations).