Відмінності між версіями «Al. BMJ Open 2016;six:e014022. doi:ten.1136/bmjopen-2016-Open AccessFigure 1 Paramedic Pathfinder tool»

Поточна версія на 12:35, 23 березня 2018

The use of the subject guide, mainly as a conversational agenda as an alternative to a procedural Tioned by others who recommend that the visual pathway could possibly be directive,26 enabled the researcher to clarify uncertainties with follow-up questions and to work with the responses provided by participants to continually inform the evolving conversation.23 27 FCS (PhD), a university-based qualitative researcher using a specialist interest in health services study but no specialist know-how in the ambulance service, performed the interviews. ABCD, airway, breathing, circulation, disability; PHEW, prehospital warning score; PR, perirectal; UCC, urgent care centre; ED, emergency division.information collection approach was most effective suited to our aims as it supplies a medium by which the globe is often understood from a participant's point of view.22 Participants are in a position to raise what they regard as critical troubles and issues, in lieu of the researcher imposing predetermined structures and assumptions.Noble AJ, et al. BMJ Open 2016;6:e014022. doi:ten.1136/bmjopen-2016-The interviews had been introduced to participants as planning to discover paramedic's views regarding seizure management and what, if any, have been their help requirements. Following Riessman,24 an interview subject guide was created on the basis in the literature and refined by way of the iterative process of conducting two pilotOpen AccessTable two Overview of sections of interview subject guide relevant to this current report and interviewer Following a short introduction as well as the participant being asked about their background and function, they have been asked about their views of and experiences of managing seizures. The key themes relevant to this existing report with examples of prompts are given under: Theme Example inquiries Perceptions of challenges faced when managing seizure What are the primary challenges you perceive ambulance crews face in managing seizures? What variables influence care-decisions? Why? What sort of self-confidence do you/paramedics have in managing seizures? What accounts for this? What alternatives are accessible when an individual will not need to be conveyed to ED? What are your experiences and views of employing and accessing these? In what way are paramedics supported in their clinical decision-making by their organisation (eg, on-scene/after-scene support/protocols/guidance)? What are your experiences/views of these?Discharge alternatives for persons who didn't have to have ED Possible strengths/weakness in relation to assistance offered to crewsED, emergency department.interviews (table two).25 Places covered integrated: (1) an introductory phase; (2) participants perceptions from the challenges crews face when managing seizures; (3) availability of discharge choices for persons who did not must be conveyed to ED; (four) training and/or help presented to crews from their organisation; (five) potential strengths and weakness in relation to the assessment tools supplied to paramedics by the service and (6) views in relation to added education desires on seizure management for paramedics. The usage of the topic guide, primarily as a conversational agenda as an alternative to a procedural directive,26 enabled the researcher to clarify uncertainties with follow-up questions and to use the responses offered by participants to continually inform the evolving conversation.23 27 FCS (PhD), a university-based qualitative researcher having a specialist interest in health services investigation but no specialist know-how in the ambulance service, performed the interviews. Participants have been informed that participation was anonymous and told the study outcomes will be published. No non-participants were present through the interviews.