Відмінності між версіями «Title Loaded From File»
м |
м |
||
Рядок 1: | Рядок 1: | ||
− | + | 17G) and with a tiny distal [http://05961.net/comment/html/?408818.html 3B Truncatoflabellum pusillum Cairns, 1989b: 71_72, Table 6, pl. 37a .--Cairns and Keller] indentation near apical spine (arrow in Fig. 18B, C, E)...........................................................................................................Carlos Molineri et al. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)?2 ?Disk like structures on the equatorial area nearly touching each and every other, maximum separation about 0.3 or less of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18A, D).... ...................................................................................... A. curtus / A. hubbardi Having a group of 2? extremely small disks beneath each and every disk like structure (Fig. 18C) ............................................................................................A. guarani Only smooth chorion below the disk like structures (Fig. 18B, E) ................ ................................................................................ A. angelae / A. magnusNymphs (only three species identified, virtually undistinguishable, the characters below must be confirmed using the study of much more material) 1 ?2 ?Around the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space in between the subbasal and also the submedian tubercles is short and strongly concave (Fig. 14A); right mandible with distal corner of mola strongly protruding ................A. curtus Around the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space amongst the subbasal plus the submedian tubercles is longer and straighter (Figs 14B ); appropriate mandible with distal corner of mola not strongly protruding ......................two Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length: 1.59?.62 (Fig. 14B, F)................................................................................................. A. angelae Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00334 fpsyg.2015.00334] 142; Ulmer 1942: 105; Traver 1956b: 7; [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.021 j.cub.2015.05.021] Kimmins 1960: 312; Sattler 1967: 104; Berner 1978: 103; Hubbard 1982a: 270;.Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes quick (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................3 Penes long, apical spine slightly marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes short, apical spine well marked, median remnant of styliger plate standard (Fig. 17C) .......................................................................... A. hubbardi FW 9.5?0.1; penile lobe strongly widened basally (ratio length / basal width = 2.9, Fig. 17G) and having a little distal indentation close to apical spine (arrow in Fig. 17G)................................................................................. A. magnus FW 7.0?.five mm; penile lobe not so wide in the base (ratio length / basal width = four.0?.0, Fig. 17D); without apical indentation as above .............A. angelaeFemale and eggs of Asthenopus species are strongly similar. They might be identified by comparison with co-occurring males. Nonetheless the eggs extracted from female adults or mature nymphs may well be keyed as follows: 1 Disk like structures on the equatorial location comparatively effectively separated from every other, separation about 0.6 or additional of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18B, C, E)...........................................................................................................Carlos Molineri et al. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)?two ?Disk like structures around the equatorial region nearly touching every other, maximum separation about 0.3 or much less of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18A, D).... ...................................................................................... A. curtus / A. hubbardi With a group of two? very smaller disks beneath each disk like structure (Fig. 18C) ............................................................................................A. guarani Only smooth chorion under the disk like structures (Fig. 18B, E) ................ ................................................................................ A. |
Версія за 17:45, 9 березня 2018
17G) and with a tiny distal 3B Truncatoflabellum pusillum Cairns, 1989b: 71_72, Table 6, pl. 37a .--Cairns and Keller indentation near apical spine (arrow in Fig. 18B, C, E)...........................................................................................................Carlos Molineri et al. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)?2 ?Disk like structures on the equatorial area nearly touching each and every other, maximum separation about 0.3 or less of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18A, D).... ...................................................................................... A. curtus / A. hubbardi Having a group of 2? extremely small disks beneath each and every disk like structure (Fig. 18C) ............................................................................................A. guarani Only smooth chorion below the disk like structures (Fig. 18B, E) ................ ................................................................................ A. angelae / A. magnusNymphs (only three species identified, virtually undistinguishable, the characters below must be confirmed using the study of much more material) 1 ?2 ?Around the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space in between the subbasal and also the submedian tubercles is short and strongly concave (Fig. 14A); right mandible with distal corner of mola strongly protruding ................A. curtus Around the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space amongst the subbasal plus the submedian tubercles is longer and straighter (Figs 14B ); appropriate mandible with distal corner of mola not strongly protruding ......................two Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length: 1.59?.62 (Fig. 14B, F)................................................................................................. A. angelae Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length fpsyg.2015.00334 142; Ulmer 1942: 105; Traver 1956b: 7; j.cub.2015.05.021 Kimmins 1960: 312; Sattler 1967: 104; Berner 1978: 103; Hubbard 1982a: 270;.Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes quick (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................3 Penes long, apical spine slightly marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes short, apical spine well marked, median remnant of styliger plate standard (Fig. 17C) .......................................................................... A. hubbardi FW 9.5?0.1; penile lobe strongly widened basally (ratio length / basal width = 2.9, Fig. 17G) and having a little distal indentation close to apical spine (arrow in Fig. 17G)................................................................................. A. magnus FW 7.0?.five mm; penile lobe not so wide in the base (ratio length / basal width = four.0?.0, Fig. 17D); without apical indentation as above .............A. angelaeFemale and eggs of Asthenopus species are strongly similar. They might be identified by comparison with co-occurring males. Nonetheless the eggs extracted from female adults or mature nymphs may well be keyed as follows: 1 Disk like structures on the equatorial location comparatively effectively separated from every other, separation about 0.6 or additional of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18B, C, E)...........................................................................................................Carlos Molineri et al. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)?two ?Disk like structures around the equatorial region nearly touching every other, maximum separation about 0.3 or much less of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18A, D).... ...................................................................................... A. curtus / A. hubbardi With a group of two? very smaller disks beneath each disk like structure (Fig. 18C) ............................................................................................A. guarani Only smooth chorion under the disk like structures (Fig. 18B, E) ................ ................................................................................ A.