Відмінності між версіями «Title Loaded From File»
м |
м |
||
Рядок 1: | Рядок 1: | ||
− | + | (1995) (see also Thompson et al. 2011, 2012a). For the current study, we moreover tallied the number of adjectives, lexical nouns (excluding pronouns), and verbs created in all utterances in the narrative, both grammatical and ungrammatical. Copulas weren't incorporated inside the verb count, considering the fact that they pretty generally co-occur with predicative adjectives (e.g. `The dress was beautiful'). Passive and present participles (e.g. `married', `convincing') had been coded as either verbs or adjectives in line with syntactic diagnostics proposed in the literature (e.g. Levin Rappaport, 1986;1Out on the 13 healthful handle participants to which the tests have been administered, all performed at one hundred around the verb portion from the NNB, and all but a single scored 100 on the noun portion with the NNB, the NAVS-VNT along with the NAVSASPT (with one participant scoring 98 around the NNB-nouns, a unique participant scoring 95.5 on the VNT, and a different participant scoring 96.9 around the ASPT). J Neurolinguistics. Author manuscript; readily available in PMC 2015 July 01.Meltzer-Asscher and ThompsonPageMeltzer-Asscher, 2010; Wasow, 1977). Within the uncommon instances where the diagnostics couldn't establish the grammatical category of your participle, we relied on its semantics, adopting the assumption that verbs denote events, whereas [https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/MedChemExpress MI-503 s12920-016-0205-6 title= s12920-016-0205-6] adjectives denote states or properties. Hence, by way of example, in the utterance `It was created of glass', referring to Cinderella's shoe, the participle created was coded as an adjective, because the sentence reports a property of the shoe, as opposed to the occasion in which it was produced by somebody. Semantic judgments instead of syntactic diagnostics had been applied in a total of 11 participles within the agrammatic participants' narratives, and 21 participles in the controls' narrative, constituting much less than two with the verbs and adjectives created. Every adjective developed was further coded as either predicative or attributive. Following the literature, adjectives had been counted as predicative if they appeared in one of several following configurations: i. Following a copula (e.g.The book was removed, but participants have been permitted to look at it as necessary. Fergadiotis Wright (2011) discuss the possibility that the lack of pictorial help might adversely impact aphasic more than cognitively healthful speakers, given that it might force them to allocate far more sources, otherwise committed to lexical access, to memory and organizational processes, too as eliminating conceptual priming which visual illustrations deliver. Even though this could possibly be [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.08.005 title= j.ijscr.2016.08.005] the case, there is certainly no explanation to think that this effect interacts with word class, e.g. that it affects adjective production [https://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10939 title= oncotarget.10939] differently than verb or noun production. The narratives have been recorded applying Praat computer software (version five.0, http://www.praat.org). All language samples were transcribed, segmented into utterances, and coded by experienced researchers inside the Aphasia and Neurolinguistics Analysis Lab at Northwestern University. Coding involved numerous levels of analysis, such as the verb argument structure level, in which each and every verb was coded for its argument structure (e.g. intransitive, optional transitive, obligatory transitive, etc.) and argument realization (i.e. which arguments truly appeared within the utterance). For detailed description of your coding approach, see Thompson et al. (1995) (see also Thompson et al. 2011, 2012a). |
Версія за 06:27, 19 березня 2018
(1995) (see also Thompson et al. 2011, 2012a). For the current study, we moreover tallied the number of adjectives, lexical nouns (excluding pronouns), and verbs created in all utterances in the narrative, both grammatical and ungrammatical. Copulas weren't incorporated inside the verb count, considering the fact that they pretty generally co-occur with predicative adjectives (e.g. `The dress was beautiful'). Passive and present participles (e.g. `married', `convincing') had been coded as either verbs or adjectives in line with syntactic diagnostics proposed in the literature (e.g. Levin Rappaport, 1986;1Out on the 13 healthful handle participants to which the tests have been administered, all performed at one hundred around the verb portion from the NNB, and all but a single scored 100 on the noun portion with the NNB, the NAVS-VNT along with the NAVSASPT (with one participant scoring 98 around the NNB-nouns, a unique participant scoring 95.5 on the VNT, and a different participant scoring 96.9 around the ASPT). J Neurolinguistics. Author manuscript; readily available in PMC 2015 July 01.Meltzer-Asscher and ThompsonPageMeltzer-Asscher, 2010; Wasow, 1977). Within the uncommon instances where the diagnostics couldn't establish the grammatical category of your participle, we relied on its semantics, adopting the assumption that verbs denote events, whereas MI-503 s12920-016-0205-6 title= s12920-016-0205-6 adjectives denote states or properties. Hence, by way of example, in the utterance `It was created of glass', referring to Cinderella's shoe, the participle created was coded as an adjective, because the sentence reports a property of the shoe, as opposed to the occasion in which it was produced by somebody. Semantic judgments instead of syntactic diagnostics had been applied in a total of 11 participles within the agrammatic participants' narratives, and 21 participles in the controls' narrative, constituting much less than two with the verbs and adjectives created. Every adjective developed was further coded as either predicative or attributive. Following the literature, adjectives had been counted as predicative if they appeared in one of several following configurations: i. Following a copula (e.g.The book was removed, but participants have been permitted to look at it as necessary. Fergadiotis Wright (2011) discuss the possibility that the lack of pictorial help might adversely impact aphasic more than cognitively healthful speakers, given that it might force them to allocate far more sources, otherwise committed to lexical access, to memory and organizational processes, too as eliminating conceptual priming which visual illustrations deliver. Even though this could possibly be title= j.ijscr.2016.08.005 the case, there is certainly no explanation to think that this effect interacts with word class, e.g. that it affects adjective production title= oncotarget.10939 differently than verb or noun production. The narratives have been recorded applying Praat computer software (version five.0, http://www.praat.org). All language samples were transcribed, segmented into utterances, and coded by experienced researchers inside the Aphasia and Neurolinguistics Analysis Lab at Northwestern University. Coding involved numerous levels of analysis, such as the verb argument structure level, in which each and every verb was coded for its argument structure (e.g. intransitive, optional transitive, obligatory transitive, etc.) and argument realization (i.e. which arguments truly appeared within the utterance). For detailed description of your coding approach, see Thompson et al. (1995) (see also Thompson et al. 2011, 2012a).