Відмінності між версіями «Ponesimod Pl»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
(Створена сторінка: Care (POC) information sources to the patient (bedside or clinic). The utility of this modify needs an assessment of both the platform and also the resources. I...)
 
м
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
Care (POC) information sources to the patient (bedside or clinic). The utility of this modify needs an assessment of both the platform and also the resources. It was reported in one tiny study that only 45  of medicine-based residents surveyed agreed that iPads facilitated improved patient care. There's incredibly little facts on the utility of mobile [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 25033180  25033180] POC information and facts resources, especially on preference. Even though, it is presumed that POC resources will bring the most effective evidence for producing clinical choices at the bedside you will find other elements for example ease of use, accuracy, quantity, existing information and facts and timely outcomes which can be important when selecting a clinical choice help tool. These variables contribute to a physician's overall satisfaction with the product. As part of our resident-led evidenced-based curriculum, we questioned our resident perspective around the worth of iPads for patient care. We also examined their selection of POC details sources and if that determination was dependent upon the kind of clinical question being answered. Finally, through this study the ACP released Wise Medicine, a POC tool. This had face validity, linked conveniently towards the proof, and was totally free to its members. We compared Clever Medicine to other details resources to answer clinical inquiries that were raised in the course of check-in rounds or morning report. Methods: iPads were issued to all residents, with access to EMRs and POC sources. At six months, residents had been surveyed on each the clinical and educational utility of their iPads and their usage of POC sources to answer clinical concerns. Subsequently, residents have been asked to answer eight clinical concerns comparing Sensible Medicine to other POC resources. Residents then chose the resource which performed greatest in the following categories: accuracy, quantity, current information and facts, timeliness, ease-of-use and overall satisfaction. Outcomes: Residents reported that the iPad was applied often on rounds (94  ). All residents reported that employing the iPad improved efficiency (one hundred  ) and 87  agreed it facilitated improved patient care. UpToDate was the preferred POC resource, but others were typically utilised for precise kinds of clinical inquiries. UpToDate was the preferred comparator to Wise Medicine (88.7  ). For accuracy of facts, Wise Medicine 19.three  vs. other sources at 53.2  ; quantity of information and facts, Wise Medicine 12.9  vs. other resources 64.5 ; present details, Smart Medicine 22.5   vs. other resources 51.six  ; speed of resource, Intelligent Medicine 17.7  vs.JGIMABSTRACTSSREVISITING DISPARITIES IN High-quality OF CARE Among U.S. ADULTS WITH DIABETES Within the ERA OF INDIVIDUALIZED TARGETS, NHANES 2005?010 Neda Laiteerapong; Paige Fairchild; Chia-Hung Chou; Marshall Chin; Elbert S. Huang. [https://www.medchemexpress.com/AZD-9291.html AZD-9291 site] University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. (Tracking ID #1940849) BACKGROUND: Well being disparities in diabetes care have been traditionally characterized working with universal objectives for glycemic, blood [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16574785 16574785] stress, and cholesterol manage. In 2008, evidence from significant diabetes trials identified that intensive glycemic manage might result in worse outcomes amongst older individuals with cardiovascular disease and high comorbidity. Because the publication of these trials, diabetes suggestions have made particular recommendations for individualized glycemic objectives based on age, duration of disease, and complications. These individualized targets may have crucial implications for assessments of disparities in diabetes high quality of care due to the fact mino.
+
Ine clinic. This desk is really a curved wooden platform that's anchored towards the wall, appears to float in spot, and tends to make it much easier for the patient to share the laptop or computer screen with  the medical professional or nurse. It has a built in swivel for moving the screen in or out of view, per HIPPA restrictions. For pictures see: http:// uvadesignhealh.org/docs/news/fellow-project-eye-contact-in-exam-rooms. MEASURES OF Results (Go over QUALITATIVE AND/OR QUANTITATIVE METRICS Which will BE Utilised TO EV ALUATE PROGRAM/ INTERVENTION): In order to ascertain the effect on the desk around the clinicalTHE PROJECT RED CHIP (Reducing DISPARITIES AND CONTROLLING HYPERTENSION IN Main CARE) CARE MANAGEMENT INTERVENTION: AN EV ALUATION OF ITS EFFECTIVENESS  IMPLEMENTATION Tanvir Hussain1,2; Whitney K. Franz2,four; Emily L. Brown2,four; Kara Taylor2,four; Mekam T. Okoye2; Arlene Dalcin2; Kathryn A. Carson3; Katherine Dietz2; Jennifer Halbert2; Romsai T. Boonyasai1,two; Jill A. Marsteller2,three; Lisa A. Cooper1,2. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 22948146  22948146] 1 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; 2Johns Hopkins Center to Get rid of Cardiovascular Overall health Disparities, Baltimore, MD; 3Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; 4Johns Hopkins HealthCare LLC, Baltimore, MD. (Tracking ID #1939834) STATEMENT OF Dilemma OR Query (A single SENTENCE): Proliferation of care management (CM) programs for chronic illness care, regardless of mixed effects, urges deliberate evaluation of the implementation elements that predict accomplishment. OBJECTIVES OF PROGRAM/INTERVENTION (NO Greater than 3 OBJECTIVES): 1. To evaluate the effectiveness of CM in enhancing blood stress (BP) and minimizing hypertension (HTN) disparities in primary care. two. To describe implementation of a CM intervention and inform the style of future programs DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM/INTERVENTION, Including ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT (E.G. INPATIENT VS. OUTPATIENT, PRACTICE OR Neighborhood Characteristics): Developed employing a community-based participatory approach, our CM plan invites HTN patients 18 years with uncontrolled BP (140/90) within the final six months to take part in two h of in-person CM--first session 1 h, followed by two half-hour sessions, more than three months. Registered Dietitians (RDs) and Doctors of Pharmacy (PharmDs) educated in motivational interviewing educate patients about HTN and encourage adherence to medications, DASH diet, physical activity, and self-monitoring behaviors; individuals with BP 160/JGIMABSTRACTSS100 preferentially see PharmDs to focus on medication adherence. The intervention is getting implemented across six clinic sites in Baltimore, three of which care for underserved populations. Now completed at clinic 1 (inner city, underserved web site), the intervention is underway at clinics two and 3. MEASURES OF Success (Discuss QUALITATIVE AND/OR QUANTITATIVE METRICS That will BE Used TO EV ALUATE PROGRAM/ INTERVENTION): 1. BP improvement 2. Adoption rates ( enrolled,  completing intervention) three. Patient [https://www.medchemexpress.com/Linsitinib.html MedChemExpress Linsitinib] satisfaction FINDINGS TO DATE (It is actually NOT Enough TO STATE  eFINDINGS Are going to be DISCUSSED?: Adoption: Of 897 eligible at clinic 1, we contacted 509 (57  ) sufferers. With the 319 scheduled, 175 (55  ) completed session 1 and 65 (20  ) completed all 3 sessions. Fidelity: Imply BP of patients (n= 155) beginning with RDs was reduced than anticipated, 135/80; having said that, sufferers continued the system given the variable nature of BP. For all those (n = 20) starting with PharmDs, mean BP was 153/90.

Версія за 07:52, 23 серпня 2017

Ine clinic. This desk is really a curved wooden platform that's anchored towards the wall, appears to float in spot, and tends to make it much easier for the patient to share the laptop or computer screen with the medical professional or nurse. It has a built in swivel for moving the screen in or out of view, per HIPPA restrictions. For pictures see: http:// uvadesignhealh.org/docs/news/fellow-project-eye-contact-in-exam-rooms. MEASURES OF Results (Go over QUALITATIVE AND/OR QUANTITATIVE METRICS Which will BE Utilised TO EV ALUATE PROGRAM/ INTERVENTION): In order to ascertain the effect on the desk around the clinicalTHE PROJECT RED CHIP (Reducing DISPARITIES AND CONTROLLING HYPERTENSION IN Main CARE) CARE MANAGEMENT INTERVENTION: AN EV ALUATION OF ITS EFFECTIVENESS IMPLEMENTATION Tanvir Hussain1,2; Whitney K. Franz2,four; Emily L. Brown2,four; Kara Taylor2,four; Mekam T. Okoye2; Arlene Dalcin2; Kathryn A. Carson3; Katherine Dietz2; Jennifer Halbert2; Romsai T. Boonyasai1,two; Jill A. Marsteller2,three; Lisa A. Cooper1,2. 22948146 22948146 1 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; 2Johns Hopkins Center to Get rid of Cardiovascular Overall health Disparities, Baltimore, MD; 3Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; 4Johns Hopkins HealthCare LLC, Baltimore, MD. (Tracking ID #1939834) STATEMENT OF Dilemma OR Query (A single SENTENCE): Proliferation of care management (CM) programs for chronic illness care, regardless of mixed effects, urges deliberate evaluation of the implementation elements that predict accomplishment. OBJECTIVES OF PROGRAM/INTERVENTION (NO Greater than 3 OBJECTIVES): 1. To evaluate the effectiveness of CM in enhancing blood stress (BP) and minimizing hypertension (HTN) disparities in primary care. two. To describe implementation of a CM intervention and inform the style of future programs DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM/INTERVENTION, Including ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT (E.G. INPATIENT VS. OUTPATIENT, PRACTICE OR Neighborhood Characteristics): Developed employing a community-based participatory approach, our CM plan invites HTN patients 18 years with uncontrolled BP (140/90) within the final six months to take part in two h of in-person CM--first session 1 h, followed by two half-hour sessions, more than three months. Registered Dietitians (RDs) and Doctors of Pharmacy (PharmDs) educated in motivational interviewing educate patients about HTN and encourage adherence to medications, DASH diet, physical activity, and self-monitoring behaviors; individuals with BP 160/JGIMABSTRACTSS100 preferentially see PharmDs to focus on medication adherence. The intervention is getting implemented across six clinic sites in Baltimore, three of which care for underserved populations. Now completed at clinic 1 (inner city, underserved web site), the intervention is underway at clinics two and 3. MEASURES OF Success (Discuss QUALITATIVE AND/OR QUANTITATIVE METRICS That will BE Used TO EV ALUATE PROGRAM/ INTERVENTION): 1. BP improvement 2. Adoption rates ( enrolled, completing intervention) three. Patient MedChemExpress Linsitinib satisfaction FINDINGS TO DATE (It is actually NOT Enough TO STATE eFINDINGS Are going to be DISCUSSED?: Adoption: Of 897 eligible at clinic 1, we contacted 509 (57 ) sufferers. With the 319 scheduled, 175 (55 ) completed session 1 and 65 (20 ) completed all 3 sessions. Fidelity: Imply BP of patients (n= 155) beginning with RDs was reduced than anticipated, 135/80; having said that, sufferers continued the system given the variable nature of BP. For all those (n = 20) starting with PharmDs, mean BP was 153/90.

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ponesimod_Pl&oldid=219452