Відмінності між версіями «Guild Wars 1 Jq Bot»
(Створена сторінка: Orrelations in between head cues and also a competitor's behaviour, skeptics have concluded that all these experiments endure from a `logical problem' that rend...) |
м |
||
| Рядок 1: | Рядок 1: | ||
| − | + | Ted by the researchers to measure the kind of intervening behaviors students exhibited toward social drinkers at risk of harming themselves or other people. Students were asked how usually they did many factors for other people who had an excessive amount of to drink in the 2-month period since the beginning on the school year. The items included "took a drink away from someone," "made someone leave a bar/party," "drove or walked somebody household," "helped an [http://svetisavaflemington.org/members/drakecold4/activity/466959/ Jq 1/8 Electric] individual use public transportation," "took someone towards the bathroom," "gave an individual water," "gave an individual food," "got Department of Resident Life staff assistance," "kept a person from passing out," "stayed with an individual to care for them," and "called 911 or got emergency healthcare assistance." Coded response options had been never=0, 1-2 times=1, 3-5 times=2, 6-10 times=3, and more than 10 times=4. Aspect analysis of the 11 items indicated that two components might exist using the 1st aspect explaining 53.25 on the variance whereas the second factor explained 11.46 with the variance. Because the second element included only 2 items ("got Department of Resident Life staff assistance" and "called 911 or got emergency healthcare assistance"), the item-total correlations for these 2 variables had been higher (.39 and .41, respectively), as well as the Cronbach alpha coefficient for the summed scale was higher (0.91), a single factor was retained for this study. All 11 products had been summed to make a single continuous variable (Mean=6.07?.27, Median=5, Mode= 0, Range=0 to 44). Intention to Intervene was a scale designed by the researchers to measure intention to intervene into the behavior of drinkers. Students were asked just how much they agreed that they would help the following individuals who had an excessive amount of to drink: a stranger, a wing-mate, a roommate, a pal. Coded response solutions have been strongly disagree=1, disagree=2, neither agree nor disagree=3, agree=4, and strongly agree=5. All 4 items were then summed to create a single continuous variable (Cronbach alpha=0.75, Mean=16.69?.57, Median=17, Mode= 19, Range=4 to 20). Intervention Self-confidence was a scale created by the researchers to measure how confident students would be in intervening into their wing-mates' drinking-related behaviors. Students had been asked how confident they had been that they could do the following things: "prevent a wingmate from drinking too much," "take a drink away from a wing-mate," "make a wing-mate leave a bar/party," "drive or walk a wing-mate house," "help a wing-mate who has had too much to drink," and "confront a wing-mate with a dilemma." Coded response choices have been unconfident=1, somewhat unconfident=2, somewhat confident=3, and confident=4. All six products were summed to make a single continuous variable (Cronbach alpha=0.88, Mean=18.51 ?.26, Median=19, Mode=24, Range=6 to 24). A student was identified as a drinker if he or she reported consuming beer, liquor, wine, or alcohol of any kind within the prior 30 days (yes=1, no=0). Student race/ethnicity (Hispanic/Latino, Asian/Pacific Islander, Black/African American, Other/Mixed, White), age, gender (male=1, female=2), and living-learning membership (yes=1, no=0) have been obtained from university records. | |
Поточна версія на 07:03, 11 вересня 2017
Ted by the researchers to measure the kind of intervening behaviors students exhibited toward social drinkers at risk of harming themselves or other people. Students were asked how usually they did many factors for other people who had an excessive amount of to drink in the 2-month period since the beginning on the school year. The items included "took a drink away from someone," "made someone leave a bar/party," "drove or walked somebody household," "helped an Jq 1/8 Electric individual use public transportation," "took someone towards the bathroom," "gave an individual water," "gave an individual food," "got Department of Resident Life staff assistance," "kept a person from passing out," "stayed with an individual to care for them," and "called 911 or got emergency healthcare assistance." Coded response options had been never=0, 1-2 times=1, 3-5 times=2, 6-10 times=3, and more than 10 times=4. Aspect analysis of the 11 items indicated that two components might exist using the 1st aspect explaining 53.25 on the variance whereas the second factor explained 11.46 with the variance. Because the second element included only 2 items ("got Department of Resident Life staff assistance" and "called 911 or got emergency healthcare assistance"), the item-total correlations for these 2 variables had been higher (.39 and .41, respectively), as well as the Cronbach alpha coefficient for the summed scale was higher (0.91), a single factor was retained for this study. All 11 products had been summed to make a single continuous variable (Mean=6.07?.27, Median=5, Mode= 0, Range=0 to 44). Intention to Intervene was a scale designed by the researchers to measure intention to intervene into the behavior of drinkers. Students were asked just how much they agreed that they would help the following individuals who had an excessive amount of to drink: a stranger, a wing-mate, a roommate, a pal. Coded response solutions have been strongly disagree=1, disagree=2, neither agree nor disagree=3, agree=4, and strongly agree=5. All 4 items were then summed to create a single continuous variable (Cronbach alpha=0.75, Mean=16.69?.57, Median=17, Mode= 19, Range=4 to 20). Intervention Self-confidence was a scale created by the researchers to measure how confident students would be in intervening into their wing-mates' drinking-related behaviors. Students had been asked how confident they had been that they could do the following things: "prevent a wingmate from drinking too much," "take a drink away from a wing-mate," "make a wing-mate leave a bar/party," "drive or walk a wing-mate house," "help a wing-mate who has had too much to drink," and "confront a wing-mate with a dilemma." Coded response choices have been unconfident=1, somewhat unconfident=2, somewhat confident=3, and confident=4. All six products were summed to make a single continuous variable (Cronbach alpha=0.88, Mean=18.51 ?.26, Median=19, Mode=24, Range=6 to 24). A student was identified as a drinker if he or she reported consuming beer, liquor, wine, or alcohol of any kind within the prior 30 days (yes=1, no=0). Student race/ethnicity (Hispanic/Latino, Asian/Pacific Islander, Black/African American, Other/Mixed, White), age, gender (male=1, female=2), and living-learning membership (yes=1, no=0) have been obtained from university records.
