Відмінності між версіями «= 0.99). Regarding productivity from institutions, the»

Версія за 04:19, 14 вересня 2017

http://brainmeta.com/forum/index.php?act=Login&CODE=01 Co-authorship evaluation making use of VOSviewer showed three clusters of authors (Fig. 3). Cluster number one included 14 authors, 3 of them have been among the prime ten productive authors: Parvez, F (116 co-authorships), Ahsan, H (113 co-authorships), and Chen, Y (112 co-authorships). Authors with larger quantity of co-authorships had higher collaboration compared with those with reduce number of co-authorships. In addition, authors inside the very same cluster are those with closer collaboration compared to authors who exist in other clusters. Cluster number two integrated 12 authors, one of them was from the best ten productive authors; Colford Jr, J.M (17 co-authorships). Cluster number three included 11 authors, 4 of them have been in the best ten productive list: Wade, T.J (47 co-authorships), Calderon, R.I (34 co-authorships), Craun, G.F (36 coauthorships), and Beach M.J (36 co-authorships). The top rated cited articles are shown in Table 6 [6, 7, 9, 217]. The prime cited post was about arsenic in drinking water in Bangladesh and received a total of 919 citations. The report was published in the http://campuscrimes.tv/members/batdomain0/activity/462901/ Bulletin of theTable 1 Poisson loglinear regression for worldwide analysis productivity on water related diseases using the keyword "microbiology"Parameter (Intercept) Keyword (microbiology) B 3.086 .058 P .000 .000 Exp (B) 21.881 1.059 95 Wald Confidence Interval for Exp(B) Reduced 20.073 1.056 Upper 23.853 1.Dependent variable: worldwide productivity. Predictor variable: number of articles with keyword "microbiology". B: coefficient estimates; Exp(B): Exponentiated values in the coefficientsSweileh et al. Even so, no research have already been carried out to assess the overall well being elements of unsafe drinking or recreational water. Bibliometric evaluation on water normally and water technologies have been also carried out without focusing on wellness connected problems [314].= 0.99). Regarding productivity from institutions, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Centers for Disease Prevention and Handle (CDC) ranked initially and second respectively (Table 4). Six of the top ten productive institutions have been based inside the USA, a single was WHO, even though the remaining three have been based in the UK, Germany and Taiwan. There was a sturdy significant and inverse partnership (r = - 0.83, p 0.01) between rank of the institution plus the total citations for publication for every single institution. Institution which ranked initial had the highest total citation even though these in rank number ten had the least total citations. Equivalent relationship existed amongst rank of the institution and also the h-index (r = - 0.913, p 0.01). Regarding top productive authors, no important dominance was seen and most authors in the top rated ten list had study productivity among 142 articles (Table five). Even so, the majority of authors (90 ) inside the leading ten list were in the USA even though the final 1 inside the list was from Spain. Best ten productive authors is shown in Table five. There was no substantial correlation (p > 0.05) among the rank of your authorand the percentage of highly cited articles published by the authors.Citation evaluation and most cited articlesA total of 1702 (75.07 ) articles had been cited a minimum of as soon as; the remaining articles were not cited at all.