Відмінності між версіями «= 0.99). With regards to productivity from institutions, the»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
(Створена сторінка: With regards to [http://brainmeta.com/forum/index.php?act=post&do=new_post&f=54 However none of the previous studies used Puma knock-out or knock-down systems t...)
 
м
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
With regards to [http://brainmeta.com/forum/index.php?act=post&do=new_post&f=54 However none of the previous studies used Puma knock-out or knock-down systems to prove the involvement of Puma in virus-induced apoptosis] productivity from institutions, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Centers for Illness Prevention and Manage (CDC) ranked first and second respectively (Table 4). Equivalent relationship existed among rank in the institution and also the h-index (r = - 0.913, p  0.01). Concerning leading productive authors, no significant dominance was seen and most authors inside the top ten list had research productivity in between 142 articles (Table 5). Nonetheless, the majority of authors (90  ) in the top rated ten list were in the USA even though the last 1 inside the list was from Spain. Leading ten productive authors is shown in Table 5. There was no considerable correlation (p > 0.05) involving the rank from the authorand the percentage of extremely cited articles published by the authors.Citation analysis and most cited articlesA total of 1702 (75.07  ) articles have been cited at the very least after; the remaining articles weren't cited at all. Cited articles had been further analyzed making use of [http://community.cosmicradio.tv/discussion/415392/however-none-of-the-previous-studies-used-puma-knock-out-or-knock-down-systems-to-prove-the-involvem http://community.cosmicradio.tv/discussion/415392/however-none-of-the-previous-studies-used-puma-knock-out-or-knock-down-systems-to-prove-the-involvem] VOSviewer to create visualization maps. Co-authorship analysis working with VOSviewer showed three clusters of authors (Fig. 3). Cluster number a single integrated 14 authors, three of them had been amongst the top rated ten productive authors: Parvez, F (116 co-authorships), Ahsan, H (113 co-authorships), and Chen, Y (112 co-authorships). Authors with larger quantity of co-authorships had higher collaboration compared with these with decrease quantity of co-authorships. Additionally, authors within the exact same cluster are these with closer collaboration when compared with authors who exist in other clusters. Cluster number two incorporated 12 authors, one particular of them was from the major ten productive authors; Colford Jr, J.M (17 co-authorships). Cluster quantity 3 incorporated 11 authors, 4 of them have been in the best ten productive list: Wade, T.J (47 co-authorships), Calderon, R.I (34 co-authorships), Craun, G.F (36 coauthorships), and Beach M.J (36 co-authorships). The prime cited articles are shown in Table 6 [6, 7, 9, 217]. The best cited post was about arsenic in drinking water in Bangladesh and received a total of 919 citations. The report was published inside the Bulletin of theTable 1 Poisson loglinear regression for worldwide investigation productivity on water associated diseases making use of the keyword "microbiology"Parameter (Intercept) Keyword (microbiology) B 3.086 .058 P .000 .000 Exp (B) 21.881 1.059 95  Wald Self-assurance Interval for Exp(B) Reduced 20.073 1.056 Upper 23.853 1.Dependent variable: worldwide productivity. Predictor variable: quantity of articles with keyword "microbiology". B: coefficient estimates; Exp(B): Exponentiated values of the coefficientsSweileh et al. Even so, no research have already been carried out to assess the all round wellness elements of unsafe drinking or recreational water.= 0.99). With regards to productivity from institutions, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Centers for Illness Prevention and Handle (CDC) ranked first and second respectively (Table 4). Six on the top rated ten productive institutions have been primarily based within the USA, 1 was WHO, though the remaining 3 had been primarily based in the UK, Germany and Taiwan.
+
Bibliometric evaluation on water in general and water technologies happen to be also carried out with out [http://brainmeta.com/forum/index.php?s=6a8977a56a5b7dfc44cfb37486353487&act=Login&CODE=01 http://brainmeta.com/forum/index.php?s=6a8977a56a5b7dfc44cfb37486353487&act=Login&CODE=01] focusing on wellness connected difficulties [314].= 0.99). There was a robust significant and inverse relationship (r = - 0.83, p  0.01) among rank of your institution and also the total citations for publication for each institution. Institution which ranked first had the highest total citation although these in rank quantity ten had the least total citations. Comparable relationship existed in between rank with the institution along with the h-index (r = - 0.913, p  0.01). Concerning leading productive authors, no important dominance was seen and most authors within the prime ten list had study productivity involving 142 articles (Table 5). However, the majority of authors (90  ) in the leading ten list had been in the USA though the final one particular inside the list was from Spain. Top ten productive authors is shown in Table 5. There was no significant correlation (p > 0.05) between the rank on the authorand the percentage of hugely cited articles published by the authors.Citation evaluation and most cited articlesA total of 1702 (75.07  ) articles had been cited no less than once; the remaining articles were not cited at all. Cited articles have been further analyzed making use of VOSviewer to create visualization maps. Co-authorship evaluation utilizing VOSviewer showed 3 clusters of authors (Fig. three). Cluster number 1 integrated 14 authors, three of them had been among the prime ten productive authors: Parvez, F (116 co-authorships), Ahsan, H (113 co-authorships), and Chen, Y (112 co-authorships). Authors with larger number of co-authorships had larger collaboration compared with those with lower number of co-authorships. Furthermore, authors within the exact same cluster are those with closer collaboration in comparison with authors who exist in other clusters. Cluster number two incorporated 12 authors, one of them was from the best ten productive authors; Colford Jr, J.M (17 co-authorships). Cluster number 3 included 11 authors, four of them had been within the leading ten productive list: Wade, T.J (47 co-authorships), Calderon, R.I (34 co-authorships), Craun, G.F (36 coauthorships), and Beach M.J (36 co-authorships). The best cited articles are shown in Table six [6, 7, 9, 217]. The major cited report was about arsenic in drinking water in Bangladesh and received a total of 919 citations. The post was published in the Bulletin of theTable 1 Poisson loglinear regression for worldwide research productivity on water related diseases applying the keyword "microbiology"Parameter (Intercept) Keyword (microbiology) B 3.086 .058 P .000 .000 Exp (B) 21.881 1.059 95  Wald Confidence Interval for Exp(B) Reduced 20.073 1.056 Upper 23.853 1.Dependent variable: worldwide productivity. Predictor variable: number of articles with keyword "microbiology". B: coefficient estimates; Exp(B): Exponentiated values of the coefficientsSweileh et al. Nonetheless, no studies have been carried out to assess the overall wellness aspects of unsafe drinking or recreational water. Bibliometric evaluation on water generally and water technologies have been also carried out without focusing on well being related issues [314]. Our study showed that there is a developing interest and study activity on this topic manifested as an increasing trend in the quantity of publications specifically inside the last decade. Fu.

Версія за 17:10, 19 вересня 2017

Bibliometric evaluation on water in general and water technologies happen to be also carried out with out http://brainmeta.com/forum/index.php?s=6a8977a56a5b7dfc44cfb37486353487&act=Login&CODE=01 focusing on wellness connected difficulties [314].= 0.99). There was a robust significant and inverse relationship (r = - 0.83, p 0.01) among rank of your institution and also the total citations for publication for each institution. Institution which ranked first had the highest total citation although these in rank quantity ten had the least total citations. Comparable relationship existed in between rank with the institution along with the h-index (r = - 0.913, p 0.01). Concerning leading productive authors, no important dominance was seen and most authors within the prime ten list had study productivity involving 142 articles (Table 5). However, the majority of authors (90 ) in the leading ten list had been in the USA though the final one particular inside the list was from Spain. Top ten productive authors is shown in Table 5. There was no significant correlation (p > 0.05) between the rank on the authorand the percentage of hugely cited articles published by the authors.Citation evaluation and most cited articlesA total of 1702 (75.07 ) articles had been cited no less than once; the remaining articles were not cited at all. Cited articles have been further analyzed making use of VOSviewer to create visualization maps. Co-authorship evaluation utilizing VOSviewer showed 3 clusters of authors (Fig. three). Cluster number 1 integrated 14 authors, three of them had been among the prime ten productive authors: Parvez, F (116 co-authorships), Ahsan, H (113 co-authorships), and Chen, Y (112 co-authorships). Authors with larger number of co-authorships had larger collaboration compared with those with lower number of co-authorships. Furthermore, authors within the exact same cluster are those with closer collaboration in comparison with authors who exist in other clusters. Cluster number two incorporated 12 authors, one of them was from the best ten productive authors; Colford Jr, J.M (17 co-authorships). Cluster number 3 included 11 authors, four of them had been within the leading ten productive list: Wade, T.J (47 co-authorships), Calderon, R.I (34 co-authorships), Craun, G.F (36 coauthorships), and Beach M.J (36 co-authorships). The best cited articles are shown in Table six [6, 7, 9, 217]. The major cited report was about arsenic in drinking water in Bangladesh and received a total of 919 citations. The post was published in the Bulletin of theTable 1 Poisson loglinear regression for worldwide research productivity on water related diseases applying the keyword "microbiology"Parameter (Intercept) Keyword (microbiology) B 3.086 .058 P .000 .000 Exp (B) 21.881 1.059 95 Wald Confidence Interval for Exp(B) Reduced 20.073 1.056 Upper 23.853 1.Dependent variable: worldwide productivity. Predictor variable: number of articles with keyword "microbiology". B: coefficient estimates; Exp(B): Exponentiated values of the coefficientsSweileh et al. Nonetheless, no studies have been carried out to assess the overall wellness aspects of unsafe drinking or recreational water. Bibliometric evaluation on water generally and water technologies have been also carried out without focusing on well being related issues [314]. Our study showed that there is a developing interest and study activity on this topic manifested as an increasing trend in the quantity of publications specifically inside the last decade. Fu.

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=%3D_0.99)._With_regards_to_productivity_from_institutions,_the&oldid=230090