Відмінності між версіями «= 0.99). Regarding productivity from institutions, the»

Версія за 04:27, 20 вересня 2017

There was a sturdy significant and inverse relationship (r = - 0.83, p 0.01) involving rank from the institution plus the total citations for publication for every institution. Institution which ranked 1st had the highest total http://www.wifeandmommylife.net/members/drake3aries/activity/347177/ citation though these in rank quantity ten had the least total citations. Comparable connection existed amongst rank from the institution plus the h-index (r = - 0.913, p 0.01). Regarding leading productive authors, no significant dominance was noticed and most authors inside the top rated ten list had research productivity between 142 http://cojosanational.com.ng/members/mint0person/activity/883130/ articles (Table 5). On the other hand, the majority of authors (90 ) within the major ten list were in the USA while the last a single within the list was from Spain. Major ten productive authors is shown in Table five. There was no important correlation (p > 0.05) involving the rank of your authorand the percentage of very cited articles published by the authors.Citation evaluation and most cited articlesA total of 1702 (75.07 ) articles had been cited a minimum of after; the remaining articles were not cited at all. Cited articles have been additional analyzed applying VOSviewer to make visualization maps. Co-authorship analysis working with VOSviewer showed three clusters of authors (Fig. 3). Cluster quantity one particular included 14 authors, 3 of them have been among the leading ten productive authors: Parvez, F (116 co-authorships), Ahsan, H (113 co-authorships), and Chen, Y (112 co-authorships). Authors with larger quantity of co-authorships had larger collaboration compared with those with decrease number of co-authorships. In addition, authors inside the identical cluster are these with closer collaboration in comparison with authors who exist in other clusters. Cluster quantity two included 12 authors, one particular of them was in the top rated ten productive authors; Colford Jr, J.M (17 co-authorships). Cluster number three integrated 11 authors, 4 of them had been within the best ten productive list: Wade, T.J (47 co-authorships), Calderon, R.I (34 co-authorships), Craun, G.F (36 coauthorships), and Beach M.J (36 co-authorships). The top rated cited articles are shown in Table six [6, 7, 9, 217]. The top cited write-up was about arsenic in drinking water in Bangladesh and received a total of 919 citations. The write-up was published within the Bulletin of theTable 1 Poisson loglinear regression for worldwide investigation productivity on water connected diseases employing the keyword "microbiology"Parameter (Intercept) Keyword (microbiology) B three.086 .058 P .000 .000 Exp (B) 21.881 1.059 95 Wald Self-confidence Interval for Exp(B) Reduced 20.073 1.056 Upper 23.853 1.Dependent variable: worldwide productivity. Predictor variable: quantity of articles with keyword "microbiology". B: coefficient estimates; Exp(B): Exponentiated values in the coefficientsSweileh et al. However, no studies have been carried out to assess the overall well being elements of unsafe drinking or recreational water. Bibliometric evaluation on water normally and water technologies happen to be also carried out devoid of focusing on overall health related problems [314]. Our study showed that there is a growing interest and analysis activity on this subject manifested as an escalating trend within the number of publications particularly within the last decade.