Відмінності між версіями «Prevented by a fire sprinkler program, and it»
(Створена сторінка: It comes from being pretty convincing in their argument and coming from a position of high credibility inside the neighborhood neighborhood.The nearby method pr...) |
м |
||
| Рядок 1: | Рядок 1: | ||
| − | It comes from | + | And I [http://sciencecasenet.org/members/ear60condor/activity/623493/ Ttitudes, beliefs, and subjective social norms.15---17 These models have an] believe they trusted me adequate to believe that I was genuinely hunting out for the betterment of my community.The early advocates of residential sprinkler ordinances comprised an informal national network of fire service workers who shared technical and strategic help. When that [was ending], the organization looked at other legislative or code efforts that we could get behind, along with the fire sprinkler situation was starting to ramp up. . . . Probably the biggest reason why we got involved was the Station Nightclub fire in Rhode Island. We h.Prevented by a fire sprinkler program, and it marked a turning point in his own career along with the broader residential sprinkler movement. As Coleman explained: "[I] asked myself a rhetorical query of `How the hell is it we can defend [factories] and can not save thirteenyear-old children'" After becoming the fire chief in San Clemente, California, Coleman proposed that the city need sprinklers in all new residential building. In 1978, San Clemente adopted the initial extensive residential sprinkler ordinance. San Clemente's ordinance was followed in 1981 by 1 in Cobb County, Georgia--at the time, the seventh fastest increasing county within the United states of america.two Scottsdale, Arizona, adopted aLocal advocates had been the essential to accomplishment in these efforts. In line with Gary Keith from the NFPA,In all circumstances you could point to various individual champions who took this on as a personal result in, ordinarily somebody . . . in the fire service, and they were in a position to rally other folks to support them. . . . It actually came down to some champion within the fire department . . . major the lead to [and] being able to convince the nearby promulgating physique that this was the correct factor to accomplish. . . . It comes from becoming very convincing in their argument and coming from a position of high credibility within the local community.The neighborhood strategy made fire prevention efforts meaningful and achievable, in accordance with Tonya Hoover, the state fire marshal in California and also a former regional fire marshal. She said,Occasionally when we look at the massive image, it really is an excessive amount of to handle. . . . [But working locally] it is about your family, your neighbors, and your region. . . . I had built trust with key members in the neighborhood, that when I brought forward code. . . . there was a rationale for what I did. And I consider they trusted me enough to believe that I was seriously looking out for the betterment of my neighborhood.The early advocates of residential sprinkler ordinances comprised an informal national network of fire service workers who shared technical and strategic support. As members of1782 | Framing Wellness Matters | Peer Reviewed | Pertschuk et al.American Journal of Public Health | October 2013, Vol 103, No.FRAMING Wellness MATTERSthe fire service, they understood that fire sprinklers save lives, reduce injuries, and control costs.2,27,28 One participant referred towards the movement as "democracy at its finest." Fire service members were later joined by burn survivors, property owners, researchers, and, sometimes, homebuilders. Following the 2003 Station Nightclub fire in Rhode Island, in which one hundred persons died in a fire throughout a concert, burn survivors became increasingly active within the sprinkler movement. (In accordance with tests by the National Institute of Requirements and Technology, the fire would have been extinguished by an automatic sprinkler program. |
Поточна версія на 08:23, 14 листопада 2017
And I Ttitudes, beliefs, and subjective social norms.15---17 These models have an believe they trusted me adequate to believe that I was genuinely hunting out for the betterment of my community.The early advocates of residential sprinkler ordinances comprised an informal national network of fire service workers who shared technical and strategic help. When that [was ending], the organization looked at other legislative or code efforts that we could get behind, along with the fire sprinkler situation was starting to ramp up. . . . Probably the biggest reason why we got involved was the Station Nightclub fire in Rhode Island. We h.Prevented by a fire sprinkler program, and it marked a turning point in his own career along with the broader residential sprinkler movement. As Coleman explained: "[I] asked myself a rhetorical query of `How the hell is it we can defend [factories] and can not save thirteenyear-old children'" After becoming the fire chief in San Clemente, California, Coleman proposed that the city need sprinklers in all new residential building. In 1978, San Clemente adopted the initial extensive residential sprinkler ordinance. San Clemente's ordinance was followed in 1981 by 1 in Cobb County, Georgia--at the time, the seventh fastest increasing county within the United states of america.two Scottsdale, Arizona, adopted aLocal advocates had been the essential to accomplishment in these efforts. In line with Gary Keith from the NFPA,In all circumstances you could point to various individual champions who took this on as a personal result in, ordinarily somebody . . . in the fire service, and they were in a position to rally other folks to support them. . . . It actually came down to some champion within the fire department . . . major the lead to [and] being able to convince the nearby promulgating physique that this was the correct factor to accomplish. . . . It comes from becoming very convincing in their argument and coming from a position of high credibility within the local community.The neighborhood strategy made fire prevention efforts meaningful and achievable, in accordance with Tonya Hoover, the state fire marshal in California and also a former regional fire marshal. She said,Occasionally when we look at the massive image, it really is an excessive amount of to handle. . . . [But working locally] it is about your family, your neighbors, and your region. . . . I had built trust with key members in the neighborhood, that when I brought forward code. . . . there was a rationale for what I did. And I consider they trusted me enough to believe that I was seriously looking out for the betterment of my neighborhood.The early advocates of residential sprinkler ordinances comprised an informal national network of fire service workers who shared technical and strategic support. As members of1782 | Framing Wellness Matters | Peer Reviewed | Pertschuk et al.American Journal of Public Health | October 2013, Vol 103, No.FRAMING Wellness MATTERSthe fire service, they understood that fire sprinklers save lives, reduce injuries, and control costs.2,27,28 One participant referred towards the movement as "democracy at its finest." Fire service members were later joined by burn survivors, property owners, researchers, and, sometimes, homebuilders. Following the 2003 Station Nightclub fire in Rhode Island, in which one hundred persons died in a fire throughout a concert, burn survivors became increasingly active within the sprinkler movement. (In accordance with tests by the National Institute of Requirements and Technology, the fire would have been extinguished by an automatic sprinkler program.
