Відмінності між версіями «PFC (5 cm anterior to M1 or M2)0.six Hz 1 single train 540 pulses»

Версія за 22:22, 6 грудня 2017

AB assessment job with neutral and threatening words (t0, t1)20 (6)19.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.orgOctober 2015 | , 2012). Therefore, provided the part of miRNAs as potential regulators of neurogenesis Volume 9 | Of depression-like symptoms, suggesting that a prior inflammation may set the ArticleMondino et al.NIBS effects on mood and emotionTABLE 1 | Continued References Study style N (Males) Imply age in years 20.six Web site of stimulation* NIBS parameters** Experimental outcomes (Time of assessment) Major results"Attend threat" ABM + sham tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + sham tDCS Feeser et al., 2014 Parallel sham controlled tDCS applied through emotional regulation (4 situations: preserve neutral feelings, downregulate, upregulate, or maintain damaging emotions)22 (7)18 (8)19.42 (20)28.R DLFPC/L supraorbital region (10/20 EEG)1.five mA 20 min Anodal: 35 cm2 Cathodal: 100 cm1. The system utilized to define the target is provided as follows, (10/20 EEG), Electrode placements in accordance with 10/20 EEG method; (MRI BN), Magnetic Resonance Imaging based neuronavigation. ** NIBS parameters are provided as follows, for rTMS: frequency, trains quantity and duration, ITI, number of pulses, intensity, for tDCS: intensity, duration, electrode size. AB, Attentional bias; ABM, Attentional bias modification process; ACC, Anterior cingulate cortex; AGN, Affective go-no-go; AIT, Arithmetic inhibition process; BDI, Beck depression inventory; BISBAS, Behavioral inhibition program and behavioral approach program; Cz, Central midline; DLPFC, Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; DWM, Delayed response operating memory job; IAPS, International affective image technique; ITI, Intertrain interval; L, Left; M1, Left major motor cortex; M2, Proper main motor cortex; MT, Motor threshold; N, number of subjects; NAP, Damaging affective priming; NIBS, Non-invasive brain stimulation; NIMH, National institute of mental overall health; OFC, Orbitofrontal cortex; O1, Left occipital cortex; O2, Right occipital cortex; PANAS, Optimistic affect and damaging affect schedule; PASAT.PFC (5 cm anterior to M1 or M2)0.six Hz 1 single train 540 pulses 130 MT1. Emotional Stroop process with neutral and angry faces (t10) 2. POMS-32 (t0, t1)tDCS studies Wolkenstein et al., 2014 Crossover Sham controlled 28 (eight) 30.9 R deltoid/L DLPFC (10/20 EEG) 1 mA 20 min 35 cm2 1. DWM (t0.5) 2. AIT with optimistic, neutral and damaging images (t1) 3. PANAS (t0, t1) Active vs. sham tDCS: 1. DWM: Reduced accuracy for damaging vs. neutral and optimistic images 2. AIT: Longer RT for adverse vs. neutral and good images 3. title= title= 1471-2474-14-48 target='resource_window'>fpsyg.2016.01448 PANAS: No effect "Attend threat" ABM combined with active tDCS vs. "attend threat" ABM combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment process: Enhanced AB to threat "Avoid threat" ABM combined with active tDCS vs. "Avoid threat" combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment activity: Decreased AB to threat (Continued)Clarke et al.,Parallel Sham controlled "Attend threat" ABM + active tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + active tDCS17 (7)19.L DLPFC/L superior trapezius (10/20 EEG)1 mA mean 17 min 24 cm1. AB assessment job with neutral and threatening words (t0, t1)20 (6)19.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.orgOctober 2015 | Volume 9 | ArticleMondino et al.NIBS effects on mood and emotionTABLE 1 | Continued References Study design N (Males) Mean age in years 20.6 Web page of stimulation* NIBS parameters** Experimental outcomes (Time of assessment) Main results"Attend threat" ABM + sham tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + sham tDCS Feeser et al., 2014 Parallel sham controlled tDCS applied for the duration of emotional regulation (4 situations: maintain neutral emotions, downregulate, upregulate, or preserve negative feelings)22 (7)18 (8)19.42 (20)28.R DLFPC/L supraorbital area (10/20 EEG)1.5 mA 20 min Anodal: 35 cm2 Cathodal: 100 cm1.