Відмінності між версіями «Were unable to complete the RVP task. b Post-hoc pairwise comparison»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
(Створена сторінка: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry published by John Wiley Sons, Ltd.Int J [http://femaclaims.org/members/goat0force/activity/1046644/ Tained the r...)
 
м
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry published by John Wiley  Sons, Ltd.Int J [http://femaclaims.org/members/goat0force/activity/1046644/ Tained the recombination event seen inside the passage 411 population and also the] Geriatr Psychiatry 2015; 30: 1147?1152 Table 4 Neuropsychological of psychotic symptoms: multivariate analysis across cognitive domains Cognitive domain Executive function Semantic fluency ([http://brain-tech-society.brain-mind-magazine.org/members/sandrabrazil6/activity/1098026/ D, professor, Primary Care Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.MA Mohammed] number of words) Phonemic fluency (number of words) Digit span Hayling inhibition time (ms) Hayling total errors Memory Immediate verbal recall Delayed verbal recall Delayed visual recall Delayed verbal recognition Delayed visual recognition Language Boston Naming Test Constructional praxis Total praxis score Clock drawing task (scale 1?) Visuospatial perceptiona [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2677-0 title= s00221-011-2677-0] Incomplete letters Object decision Number location Cube analysis F, p, pS. Medication status was included as a fixed factor. 2 a F, p and p values are shown for individual analysis of covariance (Bonferroni-adjusted alpha level of p [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2677-0 title= s00221-011-2677-0] Incomplete letters Object decision Number location Cube analysis F, p, pS. J. Reeves et al.Nonpsychotic (n = 36)Psychotic (n = 34) n = 33 19.5 (7.0) 23.0 (12.1) 12.3 (2.6) 112.9 (53.0) 10.8 (3.5) n = 34 11.2 (3.2) 1.3 (1.3) 1.0 (0.4) 16.2 (3.0) 16.9 (3.5) n = 34 11.2 (2.6) n = 34 8.3 (1.9) 3.5 (1.3) n = 33 15.5 (4.5) 13.7 (3.0) 6.6 (3.1) [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01503 title= fpsyg.2016.01503] 6.8 (2.7)F5,59 = 0.9, p = 0.41, p = 0.F5,60 = 0.85, p = 0.52, p = 0.F1,64 = 0.36, p = 0.55, p = 0.01 F2,62 F = 1.46, p = 0.24, p = 0.05 F4,60 = 3.75, p = 0.009, p = 0.20 2 F1,63 = 8.77, p = 0.004, p = 0.12 2 F1,63 = 3.60, p = 0.06, p = 0.05 2 F1,63 = 1.56, p = 0.22, p = 0.02 2 F1,63 = 0.02, p = 0.89, p
+
Transformations were as follows: delayed visual recall = log10(x + 1); [https://www.medchemexpress.com/Entrectinib.html RXDX-101] Incomplete letters = x . Bonferroni-corrected alpha level of p [https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2677-0 title= s00221-011-2677-0] Incomplete letters Object decision Number location Cube analysis F, p, pS. J. Reeves et al.Nonpsychotic (n = 36)Psychotic (n = 34) n = 33 19.5 (7.0) 23.0 (12.1) 12.3 (2.6) 112.9 (53.0) 10.8 (3.5) n = 34 11.2 (3.2) 1.3 (1.3) 1.0 (0.4) 16.2 (3.0) 16.9 (3.5) n = 34 11.2 (2.6) n = 34 8.3 (1.9) 3.5 (1.3) n = 33 15.5 (4.5) 13.7 (3.0) 6.6 (3.1) [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01503 title= fpsyg.2016.01503] 6.8 (2.7)F5,59 = 0.9, p = 0.41, p = 0.F5,60 = 0.85, p = 0.52, p = 0.F1,64 = 0.36, p = 0.55, p = 0.01 F2,62 F = 1.46, p = 0.24, p = 0.05 F4,60 = 3.75, p = 0.009, p = 0.20 2 F1,63 = 8.77, p = 0.004, p = 0.12 2 F1,63 = 3.60, p = 0.06, p = 0.05 2 F1,63 = 1.56, p = 0.22, p = 0.02 2 F1,63 = 0.02, p = 0.89, p

Версія за 16:16, 11 грудня 2017

Transformations were as follows: delayed visual recall = log10(x + 1); RXDX-101 Incomplete letters = x . Bonferroni-corrected alpha level of p title= s00221-011-2677-0 Incomplete letters Object decision Number location Cube analysis F, p, pS. J. Reeves et al.Nonpsychotic (n = 36)Psychotic (n = 34) n = 33 19.5 (7.0) 23.0 (12.1) 12.3 (2.6) 112.9 (53.0) 10.8 (3.5) n = 34 11.2 (3.2) 1.3 (1.3) 1.0 (0.4) 16.2 (3.0) 16.9 (3.5) n = 34 11.2 (2.6) n = 34 8.3 (1.9) 3.5 (1.3) n = 33 15.5 (4.5) 13.7 (3.0) 6.6 (3.1) title= fpsyg.2016.01503 6.8 (2.7)F5,59 = 0.9, p = 0.41, p = 0.F5,60 = 0.85, p = 0.52, p = 0.F1,64 = 0.36, p = 0.55, p = 0.01 F2,62 F = 1.46, p = 0.24, p = 0.05 F4,60 = 3.75, p = 0.009, p = 0.20 2 F1,63 = 8.77, p = 0.004, p = 0.12 2 F1,63 = 3.60, p = 0.06, p = 0.05 2 F1,63 = 1.56, p = 0.22, p = 0.02 2 F1,63 = 0.02, p = 0.89, p

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Were_unable_to_complete_the_RVP_task._b_Post-hoc_pairwise_comparison&oldid=263217