Відмінності між версіями «PFC (five cm anterior to M1 or M2)0.six Hz 1 single train 540 pulses»
(Створена сторінка: "Avoid threat" combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment process: Decreased AB to threat (Continued)Clarke et al.,Parallel Sham controlled "Attend threat" ABM +...) |
м |
||
| Рядок 1: | Рядок 1: | ||
| − | + | AB assessment job with neutral and threatening words (t0, t1)20 (6)19.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.orgOctober 2015 | Volume 9 | ArticleMondino et al.NIBS effects on mood and emotionTABLE 1 | Continued [https://www.medchemexpress.com/GBT-440.html GBT-440] References Study style N (Males) Imply age in years 20.six Web page of stimulation* NIBS parameters** Experimental outcomes (Time of assessment) Principal results"Attend threat" ABM + sham tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + sham tDCS Feeser et al., 2014 Parallel sham controlled tDCS applied throughout emotional regulation (four conditions: keep neutral emotions, downregulate, upregulate, or sustain negative emotions)22 (7)18 (eight)19.42 (20)28.R DLFPC/L supraorbital area (10/20 EEG)1.five mA 20 min Anodal: 35 cm2 Cathodal: 100 cm1. ** NIBS parameters are provided as follows, for rTMS: frequency, trains quantity and duration, ITI, variety of pulses, intensity, for tDCS: intensity, duration, electrode size. AB, Attentional bias; ABM, Attentional bias modification job; ACC, Anterior cingulate cortex; AGN, Affective go-no-go; AIT, Arithmetic inhibition task; BDI, Beck depression inventory; BISBAS, Behavioral inhibition system and behavioral approach method; Cz, Central [https://www.medchemexpress.com/GDC-0068.html MedChemExpress RG7440] midline; DLPFC, Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; DWM, Delayed response working memory process; IAPS, International affective picture program; ITI, Intertrain interval; L, Left; M1, Left principal motor cortex; M2, Suitable key motor cortex; MT, Motor threshold; N, variety of subjects; NAP, Unfavorable affective priming; NIBS, Non-invasive brain stimulation; NIMH, National institute of mental wellness; OFC, Orbitofrontal cortex; O1, Left occipital cortex; O2, Suitable occipital cortex; PANAS, Constructive affect and adverse have an effect on schedule; PASAT.PFC (five cm anterior to M1 or M2)0.6 Hz 1 single train 540 pulses 130 MT1. Emotional Stroop process with neutral and angry faces (t10) two. POMS-32 (t0, t1)tDCS studies Wolkenstein et al., 2014 Crossover Sham controlled 28 (eight) 30.9 R deltoid/L DLPFC (10/20 EEG) 1 mA 20 min 35 cm2 1. DWM (t0.five) 2. AIT with constructive, neutral and negative photographs (t1) three. PANAS (t0, t1) Active vs. sham tDCS: 1. DWM: Decreased accuracy for adverse vs. neutral and positive pictures 2. AIT: Longer RT for unfavorable vs. neutral and constructive pictures three. [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01448 title= ][https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-48 title= 1471-2474-14-48] target='resource_window'>fpsyg.2016.01448 PANAS: No impact "Attend threat" ABM combined with active tDCS vs. "attend threat" ABM combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment job: Improved AB to threat "Avoid threat" ABM combined with active tDCS vs. "Avoid threat" combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment task: Decreased AB to threat (Continued)Clarke et al.,Parallel Sham controlled "Attend threat" ABM + active tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + active tDCS17 (7)19.L DLPFC/L superior trapezius (10/20 EEG)1 mA mean 17 min 24 cm1. AB assessment activity with neutral and threatening words (t0, t1)20 (six)19.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.orgOctober 2015 | Volume 9 | ArticleMondino et al.NIBS effects on mood and emotionTABLE 1 | Continued References Study design and style N (Males) Mean age in years 20.6 Internet site of stimulation* NIBS parameters** Experimental outcomes (Time of assessment) Major results"Attend threat" ABM + sham tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + sham tDCS Feeser et al., 2014 Parallel sham controlled tDCS applied throughout emotional regulation (four situations: retain neutral feelings, downregulate, upregulate, or preserve unfavorable feelings)22 (7)18 (8)19.42 (20)28.R DLFPC/L supraorbital area (10/20 EEG)1.5 mA 20 min Anodal: 35 cm2 Cathodal: 100 cm1. | |
Поточна версія на 09:03, 16 грудня 2017
AB assessment job with neutral and threatening words (t0, t1)20 (6)19.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.orgOctober 2015 | Volume 9 | ArticleMondino et al.NIBS effects on mood and emotionTABLE 1 | Continued GBT-440 References Study style N (Males) Imply age in years 20.six Web page of stimulation* NIBS parameters** Experimental outcomes (Time of assessment) Principal results"Attend threat" ABM + sham tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + sham tDCS Feeser et al., 2014 Parallel sham controlled tDCS applied throughout emotional regulation (four conditions: keep neutral emotions, downregulate, upregulate, or sustain negative emotions)22 (7)18 (eight)19.42 (20)28.R DLFPC/L supraorbital area (10/20 EEG)1.five mA 20 min Anodal: 35 cm2 Cathodal: 100 cm1. ** NIBS parameters are provided as follows, for rTMS: frequency, trains quantity and duration, ITI, variety of pulses, intensity, for tDCS: intensity, duration, electrode size. AB, Attentional bias; ABM, Attentional bias modification job; ACC, Anterior cingulate cortex; AGN, Affective go-no-go; AIT, Arithmetic inhibition task; BDI, Beck depression inventory; BISBAS, Behavioral inhibition system and behavioral approach method; Cz, Central MedChemExpress RG7440 midline; DLPFC, Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; DWM, Delayed response working memory process; IAPS, International affective picture program; ITI, Intertrain interval; L, Left; M1, Left principal motor cortex; M2, Suitable key motor cortex; MT, Motor threshold; N, variety of subjects; NAP, Unfavorable affective priming; NIBS, Non-invasive brain stimulation; NIMH, National institute of mental wellness; OFC, Orbitofrontal cortex; O1, Left occipital cortex; O2, Suitable occipital cortex; PANAS, Constructive affect and adverse have an effect on schedule; PASAT.PFC (five cm anterior to M1 or M2)0.6 Hz 1 single train 540 pulses 130 MT1. Emotional Stroop process with neutral and angry faces (t10) two. POMS-32 (t0, t1)tDCS studies Wolkenstein et al., 2014 Crossover Sham controlled 28 (eight) 30.9 R deltoid/L DLPFC (10/20 EEG) 1 mA 20 min 35 cm2 1. DWM (t0.five) 2. AIT with constructive, neutral and negative photographs (t1) three. PANAS (t0, t1) Active vs. sham tDCS: 1. DWM: Decreased accuracy for adverse vs. neutral and positive pictures 2. AIT: Longer RT for unfavorable vs. neutral and constructive pictures three. title= title= 1471-2474-14-48 target='resource_window'>fpsyg.2016.01448 PANAS: No impact "Attend threat" ABM combined with active tDCS vs. "attend threat" ABM combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment job: Improved AB to threat "Avoid threat" ABM combined with active tDCS vs. "Avoid threat" combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment task: Decreased AB to threat (Continued)Clarke et al.,Parallel Sham controlled "Attend threat" ABM + active tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + active tDCS17 (7)19.L DLPFC/L superior trapezius (10/20 EEG)1 mA mean 17 min 24 cm1. AB assessment activity with neutral and threatening words (t0, t1)20 (six)19.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.orgOctober 2015 | Volume 9 | ArticleMondino et al.NIBS effects on mood and emotionTABLE 1 | Continued References Study design and style N (Males) Mean age in years 20.6 Internet site of stimulation* NIBS parameters** Experimental outcomes (Time of assessment) Major results"Attend threat" ABM + sham tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + sham tDCS Feeser et al., 2014 Parallel sham controlled tDCS applied throughout emotional regulation (four situations: retain neutral feelings, downregulate, upregulate, or preserve unfavorable feelings)22 (7)18 (8)19.42 (20)28.R DLFPC/L supraorbital area (10/20 EEG)1.5 mA 20 min Anodal: 35 cm2 Cathodal: 100 cm1.
