Відмінності між версіями «Title Loaded From File»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
There was no considerable [http://geo.aster.net/members/jamesmark30/activity/379686/ Individuals who will deteriorate clinically and also the query of early surgery] distinction involving boys and girls; nonetheless, because the response price for guys was very low in this study (30  for males versus 75  for girls), it remains risky to conclude to a lack of gender distinction. Toftegaard Nielsen (2010) also lingered to document the perceptions of the young athletes who skilled these relations with their coach. He noted that 56  from the young athletes who seasoned this situation in the course of childhood viewed as it as positive whereas 33  considered it acceptable, based on the context even though only 11  regarded it damaging. In examining responses from adolescents, the authors report that 26 viewed as it good, 53  good depending on the context whilst 21  regarded as it damaging. A Canadian study also addressed the situation of coach-athlete sexual relationships (Kirby  Greaves, 1997). In line with the authors, two.3  from the athletes experienced their initially sexual partnership with their coach and 21.eight  reported obtaining sexual relations having a individual within a position of authority in sport. However, in both circumstances, the age in the athletes was not specified. In light [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01082 title= fmicb.2016.01082] of these final results, Toftegaard Nielsen (2010) and Kirby and Greaves (1997) argued that athletes appear to have a particular degree of tolerance toward intimate relationships withJ Interpers Violence. Author manuscript; accessible in PMC 2016 October 17.Parent et al.PagePMC Canada Author Manuscript PMC Canada Author Manuscript PMC Canada Author Manuscripttheir coaches. These figures are alarming if we take into account the fact that several of those behaviours are clearly criminal acts from the a part of the adults. Certainly, beneath Canadian law, the legal age of consent for sexual intercourse is 16 years (Canadian criminal code, 2013). Inside the case of sexual relations in between an adolescent (16?7 years of age) and an adult in position of authority, the consent can't be invoked. That means that usually, an 16?7 years old adolescent can consent to sexual relations, but when there's a relation of authority between the adolescent as well as the adult, this connection is regarded as as sexual exploitation of adolescents and because of this, the consent can't be invoked (Canadian criminal code, 2013). Sexual Harassment by a Coach Sexual harassment in sport has also received its fair share of focus in the scientific community. However, handful of studies have documented the phenomenon specifically in minor athletes. Most studies questioned adult athletes or simply didn't analyse the outcomes with regards to the age of your participants (eg.: [https://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10939 title= oncotarget.10939] Fasting, Chroni, Hervik,  Knorre, 2011; G d , Sunay,  Koz, 2007). Moreover, perpetrators of sexual harassment had been specified in particular circumstances (Fasting, Chroni,  Knorre, 2014 ; Vanden Auweele et al., 2008), but not in other people (Fasting et al., 2011).Only 50  of coaches have been knowledgeable of your laws in their nation regarding the legal age of consent for sexual activity when the partnership is certainly one of authority. Other studies are likely to confirm these findings. Certainly, Toftegaard Nielsen (2010) indicated that 31  of athletes reported having had intimate relations with their coach, a number of which occured for the duration of childhood (0.5  ahead of the age of 13 years) and for the duration of adolescence (eight  in between the ages of 13 and 17 years).
+
It truly is a social method consisting of interpersonal network exchange and social modeling by adopters to those who are influenced to comply with their lead [26]. Diffusion of Innovations can provide a conceptual basis for understanding how and why the ANGCY spread or failed to spread among recreational facilities in Alberta, as, since they are not mandated policy, their adoption will not be assured, and given their limited formal dissemination, spread is probably to occur through informal, social signifies. Whereas classical Diffusion of Innovations theory describes the adoption of uncomplicated product-based innovations by people [26], Greenhalgh et al's [27] systems method models the transfer of complicated process-based innovations in organizations (Table 1). The comprehensiveness and utility of your model is attested to by the operate of others that have performed equivalent evaluations and/ or who have made use of the model to structure investigations [28-31].Case selectionPotential situations were identified in the benefits of a randomized provincial telephone survey of publicly funded [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12452 title= ncomms12452] recreational facilities [16]. Three situations were purposefully selected primarily based on their conformity to one of three varieties. An ANGCY full adopter was defined as a facility that had adopted and implemented the ANGCY within its concession(s) and vending machines, while a nonadopter was defined as a facility that had [https://www.medchemexpress.com/KU-60019.html KU-60019] decided not to incorporate ANGCY suggestions into any of its food service operations. A semi-adopter was a facility that was following ANGCY suggestions in itsOlstad et al. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:376 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/Page three ofTable 1 Significant elements of Greenhalgh et al's conceptual model for contemplating the determinants of diffusion, dissemination and implementation of innovations in organizationsFramework components Attributes from the innovation Organizational antecedents for innovation Organizational readiness for innovation Adopters and also the adoption procedure Processes of assimilation Implementation method Communication and influence Outer context Linkage involving developers and users Description Perceived attributes from the innovation explain considerably of your variance in adoption prices Common f.Ies [16]. Though a number of the factors inhibiting the use of nutrition recommendations in recreational facilities have already been identified [14-16], they have not been examined in an in-depthmanner. It is actually also unclear from these studies which components will be the most influential and could be enough to dissuade or compel adoption and implementation of nutrition recommendations in many contexts. Hence, we sought [https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0935-7 title= s12884-016-0935-7] to make the most of this natural experiment by investigating the elements that facilitated and acted as barriers to adopting and implementing the ANGCY in recreational facilities in an in-depth way. Specifically, we utilized mixed strategies inside an exploratory many case study to answer the following two questions: 1) What is the nature in the meals atmosphere within recreational facilities that have and have not adopted the ANGCY? 2) What variables influenced adoption and implementation with the ANGCY within these recreational facilities? We define adoption as a one-time mental decision to comply with the ANGCY, whereas implementation refers to various acts that have to be repeated over time for you to place the selection into practice [26].MethodsStudy style Theoretical frameworkDiffusion is usually a method whereby an innovation is communicated more than time amongst the members of a social network [26].

Версія за 18:41, 10 січня 2018

It truly is a social method consisting of interpersonal network exchange and social modeling by adopters to those who are influenced to comply with their lead [26]. Diffusion of Innovations can provide a conceptual basis for understanding how and why the ANGCY spread or failed to spread among recreational facilities in Alberta, as, since they are not mandated policy, their adoption will not be assured, and given their limited formal dissemination, spread is probably to occur through informal, social signifies. Whereas classical Diffusion of Innovations theory describes the adoption of uncomplicated product-based innovations by people [26], Greenhalgh et al's [27] systems method models the transfer of complicated process-based innovations in organizations (Table 1). The comprehensiveness and utility of your model is attested to by the operate of others that have performed equivalent evaluations and/ or who have made use of the model to structure investigations [28-31].Case selectionPotential situations were identified in the benefits of a randomized provincial telephone survey of publicly funded title= ncomms12452 recreational facilities [16]. Three situations were purposefully selected primarily based on their conformity to one of three varieties. An ANGCY full adopter was defined as a facility that had adopted and implemented the ANGCY within its concession(s) and vending machines, while a nonadopter was defined as a facility that had KU-60019 decided not to incorporate ANGCY suggestions into any of its food service operations. A semi-adopter was a facility that was following ANGCY suggestions in itsOlstad et al. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:376 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/Page three ofTable 1 Significant elements of Greenhalgh et al's conceptual model for contemplating the determinants of diffusion, dissemination and implementation of innovations in organizationsFramework components Attributes from the innovation Organizational antecedents for innovation Organizational readiness for innovation Adopters and also the adoption procedure Processes of assimilation Implementation method Communication and influence Outer context Linkage involving developers and users Description Perceived attributes from the innovation explain considerably of your variance in adoption prices Common f.Ies [16]. Though a number of the factors inhibiting the use of nutrition recommendations in recreational facilities have already been identified [14-16], they have not been examined in an in-depthmanner. It is actually also unclear from these studies which components will be the most influential and could be enough to dissuade or compel adoption and implementation of nutrition recommendations in many contexts. Hence, we sought title= s12884-016-0935-7 to make the most of this natural experiment by investigating the elements that facilitated and acted as barriers to adopting and implementing the ANGCY in recreational facilities in an in-depth way. Specifically, we utilized mixed strategies inside an exploratory many case study to answer the following two questions: 1) What is the nature in the meals atmosphere within recreational facilities that have and have not adopted the ANGCY? 2) What variables influenced adoption and implementation with the ANGCY within these recreational facilities? We define adoption as a one-time mental decision to comply with the ANGCY, whereas implementation refers to various acts that have to be repeated over time for you to place the selection into practice [26].MethodsStudy style Theoretical frameworkDiffusion is usually a method whereby an innovation is communicated more than time amongst the members of a social network [26].

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Title_Loaded_From_File&oldid=274816