Відмінності між версіями «T) yields about 2400 articles coping with visual attention?2011 Elsevier Ltd. All»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
The very first paper in Vision Study that identified focus as a crucial word was published in 1976, and only 6 a lot more papers have been published during the 1980s. The amount of articles on attention published since the 1980s is about 330. The price of publication has steadily enhanced with time, the amount of publications more than doubling each 5 years from 1970 by way of 2005. This expansion has continued, although not as pronouncedly, with about 50  a lot more papers published in 2005?010 than in 2000?005 (Fig. 1b). These articles have largely focused on behavioral investigation, with roughly one in six [https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S108966 title= CPAA.S108966] articles having a concentrate on neurophysiology. In line with this development in interest, [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160000 title= journal.pone.0160000] 3 particular difficulties on visual consideration happen to be published in Vision Study throughout the last decade (Baldassi, Burr, Carrasco, EcksteinVerghese, 2004; Carrasco, Eckstein, Verghese, BoyntonTreue, 2009; Spekreijse, 2000). The appeal of visual interest seems to become connected to an observation that is definitely most likely to disconcert a traditional vision scientist: changing an observer's attentional state whilst maintaining the retinal image continuous can have an effect on perceptual performance as well as the activity of `[http://femaclaims.org/members/pumasingle8/activity/1329620/ Ty, for which energy usage depends strongly on firing prices (Attwell] sensory' neurons all through visual cortex. For more than a century, the study of visual attention has attracted a number of the greatest thinkers in psychology, neurophysiology and perceptual sciences, like Hermann von Helmholtz, Wilhelm Wundt and William James. Far more recently (1960?980s), quite a few psychologists, including Michael Posner, Anne Treisman, Donald Broadbent and Ulric Neisser, have provided distinct theories and created experimental paradigms to investigate what interest does and what perceptual processes it impacts. Initially, there was a fantastic deal of interest in categorizing mechanisms of vision as pre-attentive or attentive. The interest in that distinction has waned as a lot of studies have shown that focus essentially impacts tasks that have been after deemed pre-attentive, for instance contrast discrimination, texture segmentation and acuity. In the past 25 years, and especially within the last 15, there has been a developing interest inside the mechanisms of visual interest: how visual attention modulates the spatial and temporal sensitivity of early perceptual filters, how attention influences the choice of stimuli of interest, how and exactly where the neuronal responses are modulated, what neural computations underlie the selection processes, and how attention and eye movements interact. Our understanding of visual consideration has advanced considerably in the course of this epoch because of many factors: (1) psychophysical research on humans has systemat.T) yields about 2400 articles dealing with visual attention?2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.CarrascoPagesince 1980. Nearly half of those articles were published since 2005, with over 250 published in 2010 alone (Fig. 1a). Of these, slightly greater than half had been behavioral research (cognitive and psychophysical), and slightly less than half were neurophysiological. Various critiques on visual interest have already been published within the last 25 years inside the Annual Overview of Psychology (Chun, Golomb,  Turk-Browne, 2011; Egeth  Yantis, 1997; Johnston  Dark, 1986; Kinchla, 1992; Logan, 2004; Pashler, Johnston,  Ruthruff, 2001; Posner  Rothbart, 2007) and Annual [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161664 title= journal.pone.0161664] Evaluation of Neuroscience (Bisley  Goldberg, 2010; Colby  Goldberg, 1999; Desimone  Duncan, 1995; Kastner  Ungerleider, 2000; Knudsen, 2007; Posner  Petersen, 1990; Reynolds  Chelazzi, 2004).
+
Many reviews on visual interest happen to be published inside the final 25 years inside the Annual Overview of Psychology (Chun, Golomb,   Turk-Browne, 2011; Egeth  Yantis, 1997; Johnston  Dark, 1986; Kinchla, 1992; Logan, 2004; Pashler, Johnston,  Ruthruff, 2001; Posner  [http://dtcventuresllc.net/members/runveil17/activity/257811/ Rences have also been reported for the duration of vigilance (Maclean et al., 2009) and] Rothbart, 2007) and Annual [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161664 title= journal.pone.0161664] [http://www.musicpella.com/members/toothtyvek42/activity/571991/ Overt spatial focus: endogenous and exogenous William James described two distinct] Review of Neuroscience (Bisley  Goldberg, 2010; Colby  Goldberg, 1999; Desimone   Duncan, 1995; Kastner  Ungerleider, 2000; Knudsen, 2007; Posner   Petersen, 1990; Reynolds  Chelazzi, 2004). The appeal of visual interest appears to become related to an observation that is most likely to disconcert a classic vision scientist: altering an observer's attentional state whilst keeping the retinal image continual can affect perceptual overall performance as well as the activity of `sensory' neurons throughout visual cortex. For more than a century, the study of visual consideration has attracted many of the greatest thinkers in psychology, neurophysiology and perceptual sciences, like Hermann von Helmholtz, Wilhelm Wundt and William James. Extra lately (1960?980s), quite a few psychologists, like Michael Posner, Anne Treisman, Donald Broadbent and Ulric Neisser, have provided distinct theories and created experimental paradigms to investigate what consideration does and what perceptual processes it affects. Initially, there was an awesome deal of interest in categorizing mechanisms of vision as pre-attentive or attentive. The interest in that distinction has waned as lots of research have shown that attention essentially affects tasks that had been once viewed as pre-attentive, like contrast discrimination, texture segmentation and acuity. Previously 25 years, and in particular within the last 15, there has been a increasing interest inside the mechanisms of visual focus: how visual focus modulates the spatial and temporal sensitivity of early perceptual filters, how attention influences the choice of stimuli of interest, how and exactly where the neuronal responses are modulated, what neural computations underlie the selection processes, and how focus and eye movements interact. Our understanding of visual attention has sophisticated drastically during this epoch as a consequence of many components: (1) psychophysical research on humans has systemat.T) yields about 2400 articles coping with visual consideration?2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.CarrascoPagesince 1980. Pretty much half of those articles were published given that 2005, with over 250 published in 2010 alone (Fig. 1a). Of those, slightly greater than half were behavioral research (cognitive and psychophysical), and slightly less than half have been neurophysiological. Several evaluations on visual consideration have been published in the last 25 years inside the Annual Overview of Psychology (Chun, Golomb,  Turk-Browne, 2011; Egeth  Yantis, 1997; Johnston  Dark, 1986; Kinchla, 1992; Logan, 2004; Pashler, Johnston,  Ruthruff, 2001; Posner  Rothbart, 2007) and Annual [https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161664 title= journal.pone.0161664] Overview of Neuroscience (Bisley  Goldberg, 2010; Colby  Goldberg, 1999; Desimone  Duncan, 1995; Kastner  Ungerleider, 2000; Knudsen, 2007; Posner  Petersen, 1990; Reynolds  Chelazzi, 2004). The very first paper in Vision Analysis that identified interest as a important word was published in 1976, and only 6 more papers had been published during the 1980s. The amount of articles on focus published because the 1980s is about 330. The price of publication has steadily enhanced with time, the amount of publications more than doubling just about every five years from 1970 by means of 2005. This expansion has continued, while not as pronouncedly, with about 50  additional papers published in 2005?010 than in 2000?005 (Fig. 1b).

Версія за 21:54, 15 січня 2018

Many reviews on visual interest happen to be published inside the final 25 years inside the Annual Overview of Psychology (Chun, Golomb, Turk-Browne, 2011; Egeth Yantis, 1997; Johnston Dark, 1986; Kinchla, 1992; Logan, 2004; Pashler, Johnston, Ruthruff, 2001; Posner Rences have also been reported for the duration of vigilance (Maclean et al., 2009) and Rothbart, 2007) and Annual title= journal.pone.0161664 Overt spatial focus: endogenous and exogenous William James described two distinct Review of Neuroscience (Bisley Goldberg, 2010; Colby Goldberg, 1999; Desimone Duncan, 1995; Kastner Ungerleider, 2000; Knudsen, 2007; Posner Petersen, 1990; Reynolds Chelazzi, 2004). The appeal of visual interest appears to become related to an observation that is most likely to disconcert a classic vision scientist: altering an observer's attentional state whilst keeping the retinal image continual can affect perceptual overall performance as well as the activity of `sensory' neurons throughout visual cortex. For more than a century, the study of visual consideration has attracted many of the greatest thinkers in psychology, neurophysiology and perceptual sciences, like Hermann von Helmholtz, Wilhelm Wundt and William James. Extra lately (1960?980s), quite a few psychologists, like Michael Posner, Anne Treisman, Donald Broadbent and Ulric Neisser, have provided distinct theories and created experimental paradigms to investigate what consideration does and what perceptual processes it affects. Initially, there was an awesome deal of interest in categorizing mechanisms of vision as pre-attentive or attentive. The interest in that distinction has waned as lots of research have shown that attention essentially affects tasks that had been once viewed as pre-attentive, like contrast discrimination, texture segmentation and acuity. Previously 25 years, and in particular within the last 15, there has been a increasing interest inside the mechanisms of visual focus: how visual focus modulates the spatial and temporal sensitivity of early perceptual filters, how attention influences the choice of stimuli of interest, how and exactly where the neuronal responses are modulated, what neural computations underlie the selection processes, and how focus and eye movements interact. Our understanding of visual attention has sophisticated drastically during this epoch as a consequence of many components: (1) psychophysical research on humans has systemat.T) yields about 2400 articles coping with visual consideration?2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.CarrascoPagesince 1980. Pretty much half of those articles were published given that 2005, with over 250 published in 2010 alone (Fig. 1a). Of those, slightly greater than half were behavioral research (cognitive and psychophysical), and slightly less than half have been neurophysiological. Several evaluations on visual consideration have been published in the last 25 years inside the Annual Overview of Psychology (Chun, Golomb, Turk-Browne, 2011; Egeth Yantis, 1997; Johnston Dark, 1986; Kinchla, 1992; Logan, 2004; Pashler, Johnston, Ruthruff, 2001; Posner Rothbart, 2007) and Annual title= journal.pone.0161664 Overview of Neuroscience (Bisley Goldberg, 2010; Colby Goldberg, 1999; Desimone Duncan, 1995; Kastner Ungerleider, 2000; Knudsen, 2007; Posner Petersen, 1990; Reynolds Chelazzi, 2004). The very first paper in Vision Analysis that identified interest as a important word was published in 1976, and only 6 more papers had been published during the 1980s. The amount of articles on focus published because the 1980s is about 330. The price of publication has steadily enhanced with time, the amount of publications more than doubling just about every five years from 1970 by means of 2005. This expansion has continued, while not as pronouncedly, with about 50 additional papers published in 2005?010 than in 2000?005 (Fig. 1b).