Відмінності між версіями «G exons, rRNA, tRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, and recognized miRNAs, we pooled»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м (G exons, rRNA, tRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, and recognized miRNAs, we pooled)
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
G exons, rRNA, tRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, and recognized miRNAs, we pooled the remaining unannotated sRNA sequences of two libraries and predicted novel miRNAs working with [http://www.medchemexpress.com/MK-571-sodium-salt.html purchase L-660711 sodium salt] miRcat application with default plant parameters and psRobot application. To confirm the outcomes of miRNA sequencing and bioinformatics analysis, six identified miRNAs (sit-miR159b, sit-miR167b, sit-miR390, sit-miR394, sit-miR396a, and miR408) and 4 novel miRNAs (sit-novel-miR15, sitnovel-miR18, sit-novel-miR53, and sit-novel-miR56) were chosen randomly for validation by qRT-PCR. The results showed that the fold alter of expression obtained by qRT-PCR was not completely consistent with bioinformatics evaluation final results, but the expression trend was similar (Fig. 4). The stem-loop secondary structure of 4 novel miRNAs is shown in Fig. 5. These benefits suggested that Solexa sequencing was effectively applied to identify drought-related miRNAs in foxtail millet.Table 3 Possible novel miRNAs with miRNA* discovered in S.G exons, rRNA, tRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, and known miRNAs, we pooled the remaining unannotated sRNA sequences of two libraries and predicted novel miRNAs applying miRcat software program with default plant parameters and psRobot software. A total of 72 novelTo determine drought-associated miRNAs of foxtail millet, we removed miRNAs whose expression levels were as well low to become analyzed for differential expression (sequencing frequency [https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022827 title= a0022827] DT libraries) and compared the normalized expression of miRNAs among the CL and DT libraries. A total of 18 identified miRNAs belonging to 16 households were substantially expressed with far more than one particular log2 fold transform (More file 6). Amongst these DE miRNAs, 14 miRNAs (sit-miR1432-3p, sit-miR156a-5p, sit-miR156b-5p, sit-miR164a-5p, sit-miR167b-5p, sit-miR 171c-3p, sit-miR2118-3p, sit-miR390-5p, sit-miR394-5p, sit-miR395-3p, sit-miR408-3p, sit-miR529a-3p, sit-miR 529b-3p, and sit-miR827) were upregulated and 4 miRNAs (sit-miR159b-3p, sit-miR319c-5p, sit-miR528-5p and sit-miR535-5p) have been downregulated; a number of these miRNA households have been related with droughtTable 2 Statistical analysis of sRNAs for manage (CL) and drought-treatment (DT) librariesCL (control) Form Exon antisense Exon sense Intron antisense Intron sense miRNA rRNA repeat tRNA others Total Uniq sRNAs 137 394 34 225 8698 98782 10278 7782 1361528 1487858 % 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.58 six.64 0.69 0.52 91.51 one hundred.00 Total sRNA 141 491 35 252 117589 2310754 184428 217892 11292502 14124084 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 16.36 [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep18714 title= srep18714] 1.31 1.54 79.95 100.00 DT (drought-treatment) Uniq sRNAs 94 180 29 91 7814 118155 10425 9434 1433632 1579854 Percent 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.49 7.48 0.66 0.60 90.74 100.00 Total sRNA 95 191 29 93 104080 2026243 197797 152753 7893561 10374842 % 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 19.53 1.91 1.47 76.08 one hundred.Wang et al. BMC Genetics (2016) 17:Web page six ofTarget prediction of miRNAs and validation by degradome sequencingFig. 3 Expression levels of known miRNA households in CL and DT librariesstress in previous studies: miR156 [31, 61], miR159 [23], miR167 [23, 61], miR395 [62], and miR408 [63]. We also identified 3 prospective novel miRNAs considered to be drought-response miRNAs based on the differential expression involving the CL and DT libraries.
+
three Expression levels of recognized miRNA households in CL and DT librariesstress in preceding studies: miR156 [31, 61], miR159 [23], miR167 [23, 61], miR395 [62], and miR408 [63]. We also identified 3 possible novel miRNAs viewed as to become drought-response miRNAs depending on the differential expression amongst the CL and DT libraries. Of these miRNAs, two (sit-novel-miR10, sit-novelmiR56) were upregulated, and 1 (sit-novel-miR18) was downregulated (Additional file 7). To verify the [http://www.medchemexpress.com/MK-571-sodium-salt.html L-660711 sodium salt chemical information] results of miRNA sequencing and bioinformatics evaluation, six identified miRNAs (sit-miR159b, sit-miR167b, sit-miR390, sit-miR394, sit-miR396a, and miR408) and 4 novel miRNAs (sit-novel-miR15, sitnovel-miR18, sit-novel-miR53, and sit-novel-miR56) had been selected randomly for validation by qRT-PCR. The results showed that the fold change of expression obtained by qRT-PCR was not absolutely constant with bioinformatics evaluation benefits, however the expression trend was equivalent (Fig. four). The stem-loop secondary structure of 4 novel miRNAs is shown in Fig. 5. These final results suggested that Solexa sequencing was successfully applied to recognize drought-related miRNAs in foxtail millet.Table three Potential novel miRNAs with miRNA* identified in S.G exons, rRNA, tRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, and identified miRNAs, we pooled the remaining unannotated sRNA sequences of two libraries and predicted novel miRNAs utilizing miRcat software with default plant parameters and psRobot software. A total of 72 novelTo identify drought-associated miRNAs of foxtail millet, we removed miRNAs whose expression levels had been too low to become analyzed for differential expression (sequencing frequency [https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022827 title= a0022827] DT libraries) and compared the normalized expression of miRNAs among the CL and DT libraries. A total of 18 known miRNAs belonging to 16 families had been significantly expressed with more than 1 log2 fold modify (Additional file 6). Amongst these DE miRNAs, 14 miRNAs (sit-miR1432-3p, sit-miR156a-5p, sit-miR156b-5p, sit-miR164a-5p, sit-miR167b-5p, sit-miR 171c-3p, sit-miR2118-3p, sit-miR390-5p, sit-miR394-5p, sit-miR395-3p, sit-miR408-3p, sit-miR529a-3p, sit-miR 529b-3p, and sit-miR827) have been upregulated and 4 miRNAs (sit-miR159b-3p, sit-miR319c-5p, sit-miR528-5p and sit-miR535-5p) had been downregulated; a number of these miRNA families have already been related with droughtTable two Statistical analysis of sRNAs for manage (CL) and drought-treatment (DT) librariesCL (control) Type Exon antisense Exon sense Intron antisense Intron sense miRNA rRNA repeat tRNA others Total Uniq sRNAs 137 394 34 225 8698 98782 10278 7782 1361528 1487858 Percent 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.58 6.64 0.69 0.52 91.51 one hundred.00 Total sRNA 141 491 35 252 117589 2310754 184428 217892 11292502 14124084 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 16.36 [https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep18714 title= srep18714] 1.31 1.54 79.95 one hundred.00 DT (drought-treatment) Uniq sRNAs 94 180 29 91 7814 118155 10425 9434 1433632 1579854 % 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.49 7.48 0.66 0.60 90.74 one hundred.00 Total sRNA 95 191 29 93 104080 2026243 197797 152753 7893561 10374842 % 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 19.53 1.91 1.47 76.08 100.Wang et al. BMC Genetics (2016) 17:Page six ofTarget prediction of miRNAs and validation by degradome sequencingFig.

Версія за 07:43, 19 січня 2018

three Expression levels of recognized miRNA households in CL and DT librariesstress in preceding studies: miR156 [31, 61], miR159 [23], miR167 [23, 61], miR395 [62], and miR408 [63]. We also identified 3 possible novel miRNAs viewed as to become drought-response miRNAs depending on the differential expression amongst the CL and DT libraries. Of these miRNAs, two (sit-novel-miR10, sit-novelmiR56) were upregulated, and 1 (sit-novel-miR18) was downregulated (Additional file 7). To verify the L-660711 sodium salt chemical information results of miRNA sequencing and bioinformatics evaluation, six identified miRNAs (sit-miR159b, sit-miR167b, sit-miR390, sit-miR394, sit-miR396a, and miR408) and 4 novel miRNAs (sit-novel-miR15, sitnovel-miR18, sit-novel-miR53, and sit-novel-miR56) had been selected randomly for validation by qRT-PCR. The results showed that the fold change of expression obtained by qRT-PCR was not absolutely constant with bioinformatics evaluation benefits, however the expression trend was equivalent (Fig. four). The stem-loop secondary structure of 4 novel miRNAs is shown in Fig. 5. These final results suggested that Solexa sequencing was successfully applied to recognize drought-related miRNAs in foxtail millet.Table three Potential novel miRNAs with miRNA* identified in S.G exons, rRNA, tRNA, snoRNA, snRNA, and identified miRNAs, we pooled the remaining unannotated sRNA sequences of two libraries and predicted novel miRNAs utilizing miRcat software with default plant parameters and psRobot software. A total of 72 novelTo identify drought-associated miRNAs of foxtail millet, we removed miRNAs whose expression levels had been too low to become analyzed for differential expression (sequencing frequency title= a0022827 DT libraries) and compared the normalized expression of miRNAs among the CL and DT libraries. A total of 18 known miRNAs belonging to 16 families had been significantly expressed with more than 1 log2 fold modify (Additional file 6). Amongst these DE miRNAs, 14 miRNAs (sit-miR1432-3p, sit-miR156a-5p, sit-miR156b-5p, sit-miR164a-5p, sit-miR167b-5p, sit-miR 171c-3p, sit-miR2118-3p, sit-miR390-5p, sit-miR394-5p, sit-miR395-3p, sit-miR408-3p, sit-miR529a-3p, sit-miR 529b-3p, and sit-miR827) have been upregulated and 4 miRNAs (sit-miR159b-3p, sit-miR319c-5p, sit-miR528-5p and sit-miR535-5p) had been downregulated; a number of these miRNA families have already been related with droughtTable two Statistical analysis of sRNAs for manage (CL) and drought-treatment (DT) librariesCL (control) Type Exon antisense Exon sense Intron antisense Intron sense miRNA rRNA repeat tRNA others Total Uniq sRNAs 137 394 34 225 8698 98782 10278 7782 1361528 1487858 Percent 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.58 6.64 0.69 0.52 91.51 one hundred.00 Total sRNA 141 491 35 252 117589 2310754 184428 217892 11292502 14124084 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 16.36 title= srep18714 1.31 1.54 79.95 one hundred.00 DT (drought-treatment) Uniq sRNAs 94 180 29 91 7814 118155 10425 9434 1433632 1579854 % 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.49 7.48 0.66 0.60 90.74 one hundred.00 Total sRNA 95 191 29 93 104080 2026243 197797 152753 7893561 10374842 % 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 19.53 1.91 1.47 76.08 100.Wang et al. BMC Genetics (2016) 17:Page six ofTarget prediction of miRNAs and validation by degradome sequencingFig.

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=G_exons,_rRNA,_tRNA,_snoRNA,_snRNA,_and_recognized_miRNAs,_we_pooled&oldid=278152