Відмінності між версіями «Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes quick (Fig. 17C»

Версія за 12:44, 27 березня 2018

curtus Apical spine of penes short (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................3 Penes lengthy, apical spine slightly marked, median VP 63843 chemical information remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes short, apical spine properly marked, median remnant of styliger plate standard (Fig. 17C) .......................................................................... A. hubbardi FW 9.five?0.1; penile lobe strongly widened basally (ratio length / basal width = two.9, Fig. 17G) and with a tiny distal indentation close to apical spine (arrow in Fig. 17G)................................................................................. A. magnus FW 7.0?.five mm; penile lobe not so wide at the base (ratio length / basal width = four.0?.0, Fig. 17D); with no apical indentation as above .............A. angelaeFemale and eggs of Asthenopus species are strongly related. They might be identified by comparison with co-occurring males. Nonetheless the eggs extracted from female adults or mature nymphs may well be keyed as follows: 1 Disk like structures on the equatorial region comparatively well separated from every single other, separation about 0.six or much more of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18B, C, E)...........................................................................................................Carlos Molineri et al. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)?two ?Disk like structures around the equatorial area almost touching each and every other, maximum separation about 0.three or much less of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18A, D).... ...................................................................................... A. curtus / A. hubbardi Having a group of 2? extremely tiny disks beneath every single disk like ��-Amanitin site structure (Fig. 18C) ............................................................................................A. guarani Only smooth chorion below the disk like structures (Fig. 18B, E) ................ ................................................................................ A. angelae / A. magnusNymphs (only three species recognized, just about undistinguishable, the characters below really should be confirmed together with the study of extra material) 1 ?2 ?Around the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space in between the subbasal plus the submedian tubercles is short and strongly concave (Fig. 14A); correct mandible with distal corner of mola strongly protruding ................A. curtus On the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space among the subbasal along with the submedian tubercles is longer and straighter (Figs 14B ); right mandible with distal corner of mola not strongly protruding ......................2 Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length: 1.59?.62 (Fig. 14B, F)................................................................................................. A. angelae Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length fpsyg.2015.00334 142; Ulmer 1942: 105; Traver 1956b: 7; j.cub.2015.05.021 Kimmins 1960: 312; Sattler 1967: 104; Berner 1978: 103; Hubbard 1982a: 270;.Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes brief (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................3 Penes lengthy, apical spine slightly marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes brief, apical spine well marked, median remnant of styliger plate typical (Fig. 17C) .......................................................................... A. hubbardi FW 9.5?0.1; penile lobe strongly widened basally (ratio length / basal width = two.9, Fig. 17G) and using a small distal indentation close to apical spine (arrow in Fig. 17G)................................................................................. A.