Mi D Rose 773 Iii

Nts that assessed adjust in teaching confidence and likelihood of making use of microskills or little group teaching capabilities. Final results: Eighteen hospitalists participated inside the workshop. At the baseline OSTE, common teaching expertise have been rated highest by the standardized intern (45 properly completed) when compared with the resident (39 ) and also the student (27 ) (difference involving the intern and student, P= 0.003). At the post-intervention OSTE, the resident and student ratings of general teaching capabilities increased (resident 62 properly carried out, P =0.03, and student 53 effectively done, P =0.005). There was no longer a distinction involving the intern and student ratings (P = 0.29). Rating of participant smaller group teaching skills enhanced for the resident (40 to 67 well performed, P =0.04) and student (39 to 62 well done, P = 0.05) but decreased for the intern (55 to 33 well carried out, P =0.07). Use of microskills ratings had been higher at baseline OSTE assessment and did not significantly alter post-intervention. In retrospective pre/post assessments, system participants reported improved confidence in their capability to teach around the ward from baseline to post-intervention (7 to 40 pretty confident, p =0.02) and teach learners at distinct levels in the course of ward rounds (0 to 42 extremely confident, p = 0.02). Participants reported they have been extra probably to create a teaching tactic just before starting ward rounds (0 to 58 pretty likely). CONCLUSIONS: A three-hour workshop with peer and health-related education faculty feedback was capable to improve hospitalists' potential to teach a variety of learners as an alternative to focus on one particular. Hospitalists' self-confidence in their capability to conduct ward rounds, teach a variety of learners and to create a teaching strategy before rounds enhanced. Hospitalists trained to use compact groupTRAIT, STATE, AND Spot: THE Function OF Character AND Environment IN DRUG USE Karran A. Phillips1; Dexter Louie2; Melody Furnari1; William Kowalczyk1; David H. Epstein1; Kenzie L. Preston1. 1National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Well being, Baltimore, MD; 2University of California, San Francisco College of Medicine, San Francisco, CA. (Tracking ID #2199122) BACKGROUND: Addiction is complex with a lot of attributed causative factors. Character 773 M To Mi traits have extended been linked to vulnerability to SUD as have state variables such as household history. Environmental things for instance neighborhood of residence have also been found to contribute to vulnerability to addiction. We sought to compare the personality traits and neighborhood of residence of drug users and non-drug users to far better realize the relative contributions of trait/personality vs. place/environment to vulnerability to addiction. Approaches: Participants have been administered the NEO 5 Aspect Inventory to assess 5 character or trait factors--neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, andJGIMABSTRACTSSconscientiousness, and the Addiction Severity Index to assess state variables for instance personal and loved ones drug use history. Place of residence was assessed using the Neighborhood Inventory for Environmental Typology (NIfETy), a standardized inventory assessing the incidence and prevalence of environmental indicators of physical, social, and drugrelated disorder (1 lowest to eight highest disorder). Evaluation was accomplished with Stata 10 and included t tests, Pearson X2, Fisher's exact and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Participants included 104 existing opioid/stimulant customers (CDUs) and 88 non drug customers (NDUs). The a.