Ct of psychotic symptoms on the RVP task (F1,58 = 5.94, p = 0.02, p

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 14:57, 12 грудня 2017, створена Flax07shadow (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: MANCOVA/[http://www.montreallanguage.com/members/spear2gold/activity/426155/ Size () c Percentage of source of teasing shows the ratio of] ANCOVA was not signif...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

MANCOVA/Size () c Percentage of source of teasing shows the ratio of ANCOVA was not significant for other cognitive domains. There was a significant main effect of psychotic symptoms on visuoperceptual performance, which included four components of the VOSP (F4,60 = 3.75, p = 0.009,Table 3 Motor speed and rapid visual processing (RVP) in psychotic and nonpsychotic patients Global Analysis Motor latency (s) Simple reaction time (s) RVP: number of correct responsesa Subtype analysis RVP Nonpsychotic (n = 36) 1.4 (0.6) 0.4 (0.1) 19.1 (4.2) Nonpsychotic (n = 34) 19.1 (4.2)b Paranoid (n = 13) 16.6 (4.4) Psychotic (n = 34) 1.5 (0.6) 0.5 (0.1) 16.4 (4.1) Misidentification (n = 11) 14.7 (4.2) Fdf, p F1,64 = 0.03, p = 0.87 F1,64 = 0.62, p = 0.43 F1,58 = 5.94, p = 0.02 Fdf, p F2,51 = 3.94, p = 0.ptitle= fnins.2015.00094 tests previously shown to correlate with striatal dopaminergic function would differentiate between psychotic and nonpsychotic AD patients and to investigate subtype dependency of any significant findings. The finding of impaired accuracy of RVP performance in psychotic patients is consistent with our previous study, where increased striatal D2/3 availability was associated both with poorer RVP performance and the presence ofTable 4 describes and compares performance in psychotic and title= brb3.242 nonpsychotic patients across a range of cognitive domains, using MANCOVA/ANCOVA and controlling for potential confounding variables.