The Way To Accelerate I-BET-762 In Five Secs

All participation was voluntary and there was no compensation for taking the survey. We defined response rate as those who submitted the survey, regardless of the time or form of request they were responding to. The Human Subjects Division at the primary author��s institution study approved the study with a waiver of consent. Data Analysis Data were compiled and entered into SPSS Statistics ver. 22, IBM Corporation (Chicago, IL). We used descriptive statistics to measure the mean and median for each item. Differences in mean scores for each domain were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc comparisons. We performed two-tailed t-tests for each item, comparing responses from 1) incoming and graduating residents Protein Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor and 2) males and females. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare responses from the different residencies. We considered a p-value less than 0.05 statistically significant. RESULTS Of the 114 residents eligible to complete the survey, 100 (88%) completed it, with 36 (100%), 22 (92%), 19 (79%), and 23 (77%) completed at the South, West, Midwest and Northeast residencies respectively. Interns represented 54% of the sample and 55% were male. Males represented 29% of the interns and 84% of the senior residents. Mean and median scores for each professionalism I-BET-762 supplier attribute for both incoming and graduating residents are shown in Table 1. Scores varied considerably, with means ranging from 4.6 to 9.6. Table 1 Value placed by residents on each medical professionalism attribute. Table 2 shows mean scores within each professionalism domain. A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant difference in the mean domain scores (F=63.3, p=Fluvoxamine which is attributable to lower scores in items related to ��altruism�� (p=��0.004, differences ranged from 0.72 to 2.54), and higher scores in ��respect for others�� (p=0.000, differences ranged from 0.89 to 2.33) as well as ��honor and integrity�� (p=0.000, differences ranged from 1.1 to 2.54), relative to the other domains. There was no significant difference between ��respect for others�� and ��honor and integrity�� (p=0.182). Table 2 Mean resident responses for each domain of professionalism. A significant difference (p